Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Nalis

Premier League Thread 2023/2024

By Nalis, in General Football and Sport

Recommended Posts

Langston

Langston

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Leicesterpool said:

Pitch invasion at City looks cheap. I can understand it in 2012. First title for a long time in dramatic fashion but when when its like your forth title in a row... meh its embarrassing. Dont imagine celtic invading the pitch if theyve won the title for 13th time in a row.

 

Celtic fans have spent the weekend chewing up Glasgow so I'm not sure about this.

MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Bert said:

When trying to be funny turns into an epic fail lol 


 

sorry, I lost the book  titled “ Burt’s permitted humour”!

Mike Oxlong

Mike Oxlong

Posted
Posted

Year on year with one notable exception the title race is really who comes top of three/four teams. More exciting than Scotland though I guess where it is consistently a one horse race. 

Koke

Koke

Posted
Posted

Pep hot a stranglehold on this league. His closest competitor (Klopp) is gone. Until Pep leaves, nothing will change.

  • Like 1
lcfcsnow

lcfcsnow

Posted
Posted

Is it just us that allows all the players families and friends on the pitch on the final day? Liverpool have let a select few on but only after most of the fans have left and after the players went round themselves.

  • Like 1
Super_horns

Super_horns

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, lcfcsnow said:

Is it just us that allows all the players families and friends on the pitch on the final day? Liverpool have let a select few on but only after most of the fans have left and after the players went round themselves.

We do it too.

copunk

copunk

Posted
Posted

Disaster for Sky today with the title pretty much wrapped up by halftime, we know how much they try to stir up drama but as others have said everything was more or less tied up before a ball was kicked

  • Like 1
FrankieADZ

FrankieADZ

Posted
Posted

jesus all you see is arsenal and liverpool fans etc posting 115 to anything city related,

 

If said teams didnt fudge up during the season against the likes of Fulham and Palace, City would have had a hard time winning the league

Fox92

Fox92

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, lcfcsnow said:

Is it just us that allows all the players families and friends on the pitch on the final day? Liverpool have let a select few on but only after most of the fans have left and after the players went round themselves.

We let everyone and his dog on. 

Corky

Corky

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

In that it was meh?

Yes. The apparently compelling title race saw the eventual champions win their last nine, the closest game being by two goals and weren't behind in a match since early April. The bottom three all finished with fewer points than our awful 2002 team and, without points deductions, there was a 10-point gap between 17th and 18th. Everyone below 7th had a negative goal difference.

  • Like 2
Muzzy_no7

Muzzy_no7

Posted
Posted

Crystal Palace managing to finish top half tells us everything we need to know about the lack of quality in that league this season. 

Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, MPH said:


 

sorry, I lost the book  titled “ Burt’s permitted humour”!

That’s fine because my name is spelt Bert not Burt 

trabuch

trabuch

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

Crystal Palace managing to finish top half tells us everything we need to know about the lack of quality in that league this season. 

As does Villa finishing fourth, Spurs finishing 5th and Manu not getting relegated.

Mike Oxlong

Mike Oxlong

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, MPH said:

in January, Sheffield United turned down a multi million pound sponsorship deal from a dog food company. Apparently their owners didn’t think it was appropriate to have WINAOT on their shirts for the second half of the season

 

No L :santa: :ph34r:

Edited by Mike Oxlong
Koke

Koke

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, RumbleFox said:

Is football objectively less interesting these days? Or are we just old?

 

We're just old.

 

Man Utd used to dominate, they three peated twice. I don't remember people saying the league is boring back then. I understand MCFC and their 115 charges, but in my opinion the the quality of football is better now, its just a different team dominating. Less of Bolton, Stoke, WBA. More of Brighton, Wolves, Bournemouth. The latter 3 are far more aesthetically pleasing.

  • Like 3
MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Koke said:

 

We're just old.

 

Man Utd used to dominate, they three peated twice. I don't remember people saying the league is boring back then. I understand MCFC and their 115 charges, but in my opinion the the quality of football is better now, its just a different team dominating. Less of Bolton, Stoke, WBA. More of Brighton, Wolves, Bournemouth. The latter 3 are far more aesthetically pleasing.


 

Quality is better in terms of technical ability but I don’t find it as exciting. I used to like the faster pace to football. 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...