Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Daggers said:

 

That doesn't count for the terrible passes down the line or the crosses that are just punts. Man's passing is all round suss despite Ndid also being poor.

Not saying I am saying Kristiansen is a great passer. I don’t understand why he starts ahead of Ricardo.

 

I hope Ricardo gets on at halftime for him and Justin moves across as LB.

Edited by Tom12345
Posted
1 minute ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

But why did VAR tell him to go to the screen, why didn't VAR say it's a goal

Because objectively he's offside, but it's a subjective decision that's down to the on field ref to decide whether he's blocking the view of the keeper.

  • Like 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, Haywood_6 said:

I'm just gonna say it.

 

Ayew on for Fatawu.

 

I love the guy but he keeps giving the ball away. He's got to learn the hard way.

He'd probably be better with the hopeless JJ behind him and the experienced Ricardo in his place.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, AKCJ said:

I cannot stand VAR.

 

Yes it's helped us but that's taken ****ing ages to work out a simple decision. Was Vardy in Leno's line of sight? No. So why does it take 15 minutes to make the decision? It's bad enough for us at home yet in the ground you've got no idea whats going on.

I agree re VAR

Posted
Just now, ozleicester said:

the aim of var is to remove doubt and errotrs and speed the game.  We are no better or worse for its involvement except we sat around 3 minutes and spoilt the flow and excitement of the game

There was an error. It was corrected.

 

I would say that's a better game. But I guess that's subjective.

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Gav_LCFC14 said:

Need to drag Ndidi and Reid off at half time, these two offer absolutely nothing.

Should have never started when we have Skipp and Mavididi on the bench.

Posted
1 minute ago, LcFc_Smiv said:

Because objectively he's offside, but it's a subjective decision that's down to the on field ref to decide whether he's blocking the view of the keeper.

This

Posted
1 minute ago, leicsmac said:

There was an error. It was corrected.

 

I would say that's a better game. But I guess that's subjective.

 

 

did the ref blow for offside?

Posted

Think I’m finally starting to get a grasp of Cooper’s tactics: play really shit in the first half, let the opposition tire themselves out with all their chances, and then, once they’re exhausted, we start pushing forward. Brilliant, really.

  • Haha 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...