Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

We would be making barely anything if we sold him for that

 

Possible actually nothing (maybe even a loss) if Genk have a sell on clause in that as well (which I would not be surprised if they do)

 

Ridiculous

Edited by moore_94
Posted
1 minute ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

Paid 22.5million € for him so if we get 26m€ for him I’m guessing that’s a profit of around 7-8m for PSR? 
 

Pretty pathetic tbf. 

Book value this summer would be around €17m

 

So €9m / £7.5m profit

 

Possibly less if Genk have a sell on clause

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

We would be making barely anything if we sold him for that

 

Possible actually nothing (maybe even a loss) if Genk have a sell on clause in that as well (which I would not be surprised if they do)

 

Ridiculous

It would only be a sell on clause of any profit of the value we paid for him.

 

So if he goes for the then they would get **** all really

Edited by Fox85
Posted
1 minute ago, moore_94 said:

Book value this summer would be around €17m

 

So €9m / £7.5m profit

 

Possibly less if Genk have a sell on clause

basically we are making sod and all from it

Posted

What a bargain that is. Can we not loan him out for a  season? Very good player that fee is far to low.

Posted
8 minutes ago, jv1 said:

Probably unpopular opinion but hey ho - I think he has been absolutely useless- easily as bad as plenty of them and 1 half decent game against the worst prem side ever isn’t going to change my opinion  - seems like him and mads probably only sellable assets - can’t see anyone paying that for him but if they did we would sell without a doubt 

 

2 goals and 3 assist all season is absolutely cr*p

Lol okay…….

Posted

If that's true then his sale will not be much use for funding any potential PSR shortfall or generate serious funds for promotion.

 

I'd pitch a realistic ask of £30-35m so not massively more but with a sell on or add ons. £23m is utter muck though.

 

No wonder the likes of Evans, Nelson etc are being linked away too....

Posted
16 minutes ago, jv1 said:

Probably unpopular opinion but hey ho - I think he has been absolutely useless- easily as bad as plenty of them and 1 half decent game against the worst prem side ever isn’t going to change my opinion  - seems like him and mads probably only sellable assets - can’t see anyone paying that for him but if they did we would sell without a doubt 

 

2 goals and 3 assist all season is absolutely cr*p

For me, its not so much about how good he is currently,  but more so his potential. 

 

Very similar with Fatawu. They both show some inexperience, and both can be as frustrating to watch as they can be exciting, but both have potential to be great PL players, more so BEK though, there's something special there.

  • Like 1
Posted

Why would we "Just set the price of the release clause"?

 

If it's a clause it was set when he signed.  If it's a figure that's just been set, it's not a clause.  Smells like sweaty bollocks.  And you know that smell, don't ya?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, JimJams said:

Why would we "Just set the price of the release clause"?

 

If it's a clause it was set when he signed.  If it's a figure that's just been set, it's not a clause.  Smells like sweaty bollocks.  And you know that smell, don't ya?

Given that there is no chance whatsoever that this journalist has been told Bilal’s ‘release clause’ by anybody who would know. I’d say you’re probably right.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, adejo92 said:

For me, its not so much about how good he is currently,  but more so his potential. 

 

Very similar with Fatawu. They both show some inexperience, and both can be as frustrating to watch as they can be exciting, but both have potential to be great PL players, more so BEK though, there's something special there.

I can hear the first part and yep there could be a player at some point there but this year on that showing he has been honking - to many with one game memories on here - probably same ones who think ruud staying wouldn’t be the worst idea 

 

all iv seen week in week out is the odd bit of skill for 10% of the time and a bang average prem player out of his depth giving the ball away time after time after time for 90% of the time 
 

I actually don’t dislike the lad but he has done absolutely nothing to show he could cut it week in week out at that level - I hope im proved wrong as he definitely puts a shift in which is minimum for me but plenty don’t so I’ll give him that but big player or star of our season he definitely hasn’t been 

Edited by jv1
Posted

Ridiculously low and I'd be shocked if he wasn't playing PL football next season (or a top-5 European league).

 

Poor planning on our part to not push for higher, because that could prove to be a bargain for a mid-table team in the PL.

 

He's one of very few players I'd have love to have kept around but that hope of keeping him here dwindles when you hear how low this clause is. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...