Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, dillonpanthers87 said:

I posted this before; I honestly think we'll end up with Rafa. I don't want this to happen btw. Just gut feeling, hope I'm wrong

Or Southgate

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Skid_1884 said:

Carrick outwitted Enzo twice, got his tactics spot on.

Would prefer a manger who is pragmatic rather than cut and paste setup like robots every week.

Then I suggest you read what Middlesbrough fans think of him. He’s accused of being too slow and predictable and having no plan B. They’ve gone backwards for 2 seasons and they feel the squad was good enough to finish much higher than teams they’ve finished behind.

 

A firm no to Carrick from me. If he isn’t good enough for them, he’s not good enough for us.

Edited by Kitchandro
  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Kitchandro said:

Then I suggest you read what Middlesbrough fans think of him. He’s accused of being too slow and predictable and having no plan B. They’ve gone backwards for 2 seasons and they feel the squad was good enough to finish much higher than teams they’ve finished behind.

 

A firm no to Carrick from me. If he isn’t good enough for them, he’s not good enough for us.

I agree, don't want Carrick anymore than I wanted Martin. However, not many managers/coaches do actually have a plan B.

 

Any road, we don't even have a vacancy (yet).

Posted

Don't know who would even wanna come to this club anymore. Managers get treated like dung, players probably getting treated the same, fans definitely get treated worse then both. Still waiting for the apology we was dung post.

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, LestaLad said:

I’m choosing to believe that we’re waiting to be classed as a championship club to then get the cheaper comp for Rohl and cheaper sacking for Ruud.

I know we’re speculating upon speculation but surely it wouldn’t have been difficult to draft the contract in a way such that a cheaper sacking was triggered at the point of relegation being confirmed by league position, rather than the official swapping of shares process. Maybe it gets thorny with potential for points decisions etc but it feels like, if true, that would be avoidable drafting. 

Edited by theessexfox
Posted
3 hours ago, teblin said:

I know this was a joke but this would be a great appointment.

I've been calling for it for a while now. Ralf Rangnick is not in it for the money, he's reportedly earning £2-3m in his Austria post. I'd happily take £5m a season from the transfer budget and give it to him. Him overseeing our club and building us a proper network is worth more than the majority of £5m players we are likely to sign in the future. 

Ambitious as hell to go for him, but he opted out of his role at United and took the Austria gig, so who knows what he would be open to, advisory role until his time with them ends and then he could take over as DOF? My guess is though, Top would need to prove he is willing to actually change anything in order to bring in the calibre of RR. 

Posted

If the majority of players are happy with Ruud then roll with it let him clear out by players who are not committed he seems like he wants to stay at leat give him till Christmas 

Posted (edited)

Also I don’t think Rohl would be any better than Ruud and Dyche while he would be steady would revert to Cooper style tactics which the team did not respond to.

 

id just give Ruud till Christmas and focus on building the team 

 

moee importantly bring in some back room staff a yapp stam or robben type would help him massively 

Edited by whoareyaaa
Posted
2 hours ago, dillonpanthers87 said:

I posted this before; I honestly think we'll end up with Rafa. I don't want this to happen btw. Just gut feeling, hope I'm wrong

I’ve always had a soft spot for Rafa 

Posted
4 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

If the majority of players are happy with Ruud then roll with it let him clear out by players who are not committed he seems like he wants to stay at leat give him till Christmas 

The players are here and paid to win matches, and IMO shouldn't have a say in the matter.

 

If the remit of RvN staying is them "being happy" with him then we are doomed. Player power of this level,  dictating decisions of this importance can't happen. Ever.

 

Also, what makes you think we can actually clear out the non-committed players anyway,    We seem to have failed hideously so far..

 

RvN was a brilliant player, but will never be a manager as long as he has a hole in his @rse..  we need shot ASAP.

  • Like 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

Also I don’t think Rohl would be any better than Ruud and Dyche while he would be steady would revert to Cooper style tactics which the team did not respond to.

 

id just give Ruud till Christmas and focus on building the team 

 

moee importantly bring in some back room staff a yapp stam or robben type would help him massively 

Really?

 

Polar opposite IMO.

 

He, unlike Cooper and especially Ruud has tactical flexibility and adaptability. He likes a 5-4-1 formation, which can change to a 3-4-3 when in possession, emphasising wing-backs for width and fluidity. Rohl's teams also have a high press, aiming to force mistakes in midfield and win the ball back in central areas. So no pissing around with the ball in our 18yd area inviting pressure and waiting for the inevitable mistake.

 

I don't think he's wedded to and stuck hell bend with a single main style, Cooper was and Dyche definitely is.

 

At least we would hopefully see a bit of entertaining football on the pitch.

Posted

Michael Carrick reeks of us. Out of work so cheap, beat us twice in 2023/24 so gets overestimated on here somewhat despite two pretty disappointing campaigns at Middlesbrough, quite hipster vibes. Basically he's not hugely dissimilar to Martin without a lot of the same baggage. Could see them going for him.

Posted
2 hours ago, Guppys Love Child said:

Really?

 

Polar opposite IMO.

 

He, unlike Cooper and especially Ruud has tactical flexibility and adaptability. He likes a 5-4-1 formation, which can change to a 3-4-3 when in possession, emphasising wing-backs for width and fluidity. Rohl's teams also have a high press, aiming to force mistakes in midfield and win the ball back in central areas. So no pissing around with the ball in our 18yd area inviting pressure and waiting for the inevitable mistake.

 

I don't think he's wedded to and stuck hell bend with a single main style, Cooper was and Dyche definitely is.

 

At least we would hopefully see a bit of entertaining football on the pitch.

5-4-1 wouldn’t be for our attacking players tbh. 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Richard said:

How are people more in favour of Carrick than Russell or Dyche  lol

Russel & Dyche football is a painful watch..  I still want to be entertained.   

Football is a beautiful game but not the way these two play it.

I'll take Carrick over these two any day of the week.

  • Like 1
Posted

Ruud should never have lasted till the end of last season and now some on hear think he should be given the start of next season. 
Baffling. 
A few good results against rubbish who we will play next season can’t hide what a dreadful manager he is. 
I’d rather we have someone to upset the current overhyped egos of these players. 
We cannot go into next season with Ruud in charge. 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Dan said:

Michael Carrick reeks of us. Out of work so cheap, beat us twice in 2023/24 so gets overestimated on here somewhat despite two pretty disappointing campaigns at Middlesbrough, quite hipster vibes. Basically he's not hugely dissimilar to Martin without a lot of the same baggage. Could see them going for him.

Cov beat them home and away every season as well.

Posted

Well now we have officially become a championship club, I think if anything is going to happen it will be in the next few days. 
 

Personally I think the club have been waiting for this to happen before engaging with Ruud as contractually any wage reduction clauses will kick in from now and therefore it will potentially be a lot cheaper to pay him off from now. 
 

I imagine the decision to get rid of Ruud was made sone time ago but the club will have been given legal advice to hold off until a certain point in time when the pay off would be greatly reduced and therefore minimise any PSR implications. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

Well now we have officially become a championship club, I think if anything is going to happen it will be in the next few days. 
 

Personally I think the club have been waiting for this to happen before engaging with Ruud as contractually any wage reduction clauses will kick in from now and therefore it will potentially be a lot cheaper to pay him off from now. 
 

I imagine the decision to get rid of Ruud was made sone time ago but the club will have been given legal advice to hold off until a certain point in time when the pay off would be greatly reduced and therefore minimise any PSR implications. 

I love your optimism, and this could possibly be true, but I just think it's a case of neglect as they are on holiday mode. 

Posted

People think the likes of Rafa Benitez( a champions league winner and manager of some of the greatest clubs plus Everton!) or Soutgate(ex International Manager) will manage LCFC after having discussions with Rudkin and Top!!!lollollol

Posted
46 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

Well now we have officially become a championship club, I think if anything is going to happen it will be in the next few days. 
 

Personally I think the club have been waiting for this to happen before engaging with Ruud as contractually any wage reduction clauses will kick in from now and therefore it will potentially be a lot cheaper to pay him off from now. 
 

I imagine the decision to get rid of Ruud was made sone time ago but the club will have been given legal advice to hold off until a certain point in time when the pay off would be greatly reduced and therefore minimise any PSR implications. 

Rob Tanner suggested a few days ago that it may be the new accounting period they’re waiting for, which isn’t for another three-and-a-half weeks. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...