Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Happy Fox

Danny Rohl - incoming?

By Happy Fox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

LCFCJohn

LCFCJohn

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Steve Earle said:

And we might for the most part be happy with Rohl as the most attractive candidate out there. So long as we all understand that ‘candidate’ means someone who’s actually prepared to work for our board. And so long as we don’t give those uncommunicative twerps any credit at all for securing one of their preferred candidates…

 

If it’s him I’ll back him. My personal jury is still out as to whether I’ll go and support the current regime by actually attending a match. And until January last year, I’d barely missed a home game in 45 years…

Correct. Rohl is an obvious stand out candidate, and due to the situation at Wednesday, is an open goal to secure. Even then, we seem to be making hard work of it, being reactive to the situation at Wednesday rather than securing him. Meanwhile we creep closer to the season starting. 
 

I look at it this way, if a striker has an open goal from a few yards out, fumbles it and nearly messes it up before it rolls over the line, you’d say he was lucky and to not have scored would be a huge f*** up. You wouldn’t be heaping praise and credit on him.

 

That is the way I look at the appointment of Rohl. Aiyawatt, Rudkin and co certainly don’t deserve credit if it does go through.

  • Like 1
Philkeavo

Philkeavo

Posted
Posted

It would be first class trolling by LCFC if they announced Röhl today, WEDNESDAY 2 July.
 

i suspect if it is him, they wont announce until they issue a video with Aiyawatt and Rudkin fawning over him while showing him around Seagrave. 

ClaphamFox

ClaphamFox

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LCFCJohn said:

Correct. Rohl is an obvious stand out candidate, and due to the situation at Wednesday, is an open goal to secure. Even then, we seem to be making hard work of it, being reactive to the situation at Wednesday rather than securing him. Meanwhile we creep closer to the season starting. 
 

I look at it this way, if a striker has an open goal from a few yards out, fumbles it and nearly messes it up before it rolls over the line, you’d say he was lucky and to not have scored would be a huge f*** up. You wouldn’t be heaping praise and credit on him.

 

That is the way I look at the appointment of Rohl. Aiyawatt, Rudkin and co certainly don’t deserve credit if it does go through.

The last time we had a managerial ‘open goal’ fall to us by chance was when Martin O’Neill suddenly became available after falling out with Robert Chase at Norwich shortly after Mark McGhee walked out on us. 

  • Popular Post
SecretPro

SecretPro

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
18 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

 

Regret saying anything yet? 

 

100% not. I'm on the money. 

  • Like 7
Salieri

Salieri

Posted
Posted
Just now, SecretPro said:

100% not. I'm on the money. 

Hope so as I chucked £100 on at 2/1

a few days ago 😅

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Brainy

Brainy

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, SecretPro said:

100% not. I'm on the money. 

Is there any chance your friend has incorrectly been hearing the name Danny Rohl as opposed to Danny Ward

  • Haha 3
Plastik Man

Plastik Man

Posted
Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, LCFCJohn said:

Correct. Rohl is an obvious stand out candidate, and due to the situation at Wednesday, is an open goal to secure. Even then, we seem to be making hard work of it, being reactive to the situation at Wednesday rather than securing him. Meanwhile we creep closer to the season starting. 
 

I look at it this way, if a striker has an open goal from a few yards out, fumbles it and nearly messes it up before it rolls over the line, you’d say he was lucky and to not have scored would be a huge f*** up. You wouldn’t be heaping praise and credit on him.

 

That is the way I look at the appointment of Rohl. Aiyawatt, Rudkin and co certainly don’t deserve credit if it does go through.

I'm no fan of the current regime, their decision making or lack of communication. However, if by drawing the negotiations out they've both eased PSR concerns and reduced any compensation payment, then surely that is a good thing? 

 

It's easy to criticise them, but surely being too gung-ho in securing signings in the past, agreeing over the top fees and wages etc. has been one of the biggest issues in getting into this mess?

 

I'm as impatient as anyone waiting for the news we have signed an exciting new manager, but in the grand scheme of things, it won't be that long.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I hope not anyway!lol

Edited by Plastik Man
errant "going" gone
  • Like 4
Jon the Hat

Jon the Hat

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Pressuambly this would have been done but the owner has to drag himself half way across the world to meet him and be the centre of attention as usual.

What's the point of owning a football club if you can't take credit for the good bits?

  • Like 1
suffolk fox

suffolk fox

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, LestaLad said:

👀

You do realise there is a polo tournament in the uk at Cowdray park.  King Power are in it have a game at 1130hrs.  Top is coming for that nothing else.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 3
Torten

Torten

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Pressuambly this would have been done but the owner has to drag himself half way across the world to meet him and be the centre of attention as usual.

It's no bad thing for any potential new manager and the owner meeting face-to-face.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...