Other clubs transfers - Summer 2025

[Super_horns]

2 hours ago, em9999 said:

Wrexham make shock move to sign Christian Eriksen, weeks after he left Man United: Agent confirms talks over shock transfer at Ryan Reynolds and Rob Mac's club

 

Been rejected already apparently.

[LCFCJohn]

Good signing for Charlton. Wouldn’t have minded him but I don’t think our fans would have accepted him.

 

Charlton close to finalising Kelman deal

Latest from Sky Sports News' Dharmesh Sheth:

Charlton are close to finalising a deal to sign QPRforward Charlie Kelman.

Kelman spent last season on loan at League One side Leyton Orient and scored 27 goals in all competitions

[adejo92]

Gibbs-White clearly offered silly money to sign his new contract...or at gun point.

[Jazzy_Jeff]

29 minutes ago, adejo92 said:

Gibbs-White clearly offered silly money to sign his new contract...or at gun point.

Not just saying it because it’s Forest but they are dodgy.

 

i really hope that his performances fall off a cliff, no-one comes in for him and they are stuck with him on mega money until his contract ends (sound familiar?!) 

 

Can see this getting messy with Spurs and already at loggerheads with Palace.

[DLH]

1 hour ago, adejo92 said:

Gibbs-White clearly offered silly money to sign his new contract...or at gun point.

He’s only signed a years extension. I suspect he’ll be off in 12 months time, but it gives the player a higher wage and Forest a higher transfer fee, next year.

 

Suits both short term, I guess.

[Jazzy_Jeff]

19 minutes ago, DLH said:

He’s only signed a years extension. I suspect he’ll be off in 12 months time, but it gives the player a higher wage and Forest a higher transfer fee, next year.

 

Suits both short term, I guess.

Might make him less attractive to suitors though, I thought £60m was excessive when the spurs news broke.

 

If he (and they) have a poor season it’s possible no one wants him, especially if others impress at World Cup. 
 

It’s risky from Forest, I would have taken the £60m and reinvested.

 

Clubs won’t do business with them if they aren’t careful.

[Bordersfox]

21 hours ago, LCFCJohn said:

Good signing for Charlton. Wouldn’t have minded him but I don’t think our fans would have accepted him.

 

 

Charlton close to finalising Kelman deal

Latest from Sky Sports News' Dharmesh Sheth:

Charlton are close to finalising a deal to sign QPRforward Charlie Kelman.

Kelman spent last season on loan at League One side Leyton Orient and scored 27 goals in all competitions

Speaking to my charlton supporting family members I'm not sure they have accepted him yet either!  

 

10 minutes ago, Jazzy_Jeff said:

Might make him less attractive to suitors though, I thought £60m was excessive when the spurs news broke.

 

If he (and they) have a poor season it’s possible no one wants him, especially if others impress at World Cup. 
 

It’s risky from Forest, I would have taken the £60m and reinvested.

 

Clubs won’t do business with them if they aren’t careful.

It won't happen but it would be delicious if Forest went down and had to flog him off cheap next year.

 

Edit: whoops the old accidental double quote! 

Edited 27 July 2025 by Bordersfox

[DLH]

42 minutes ago, Jazzy_Jeff said:

Might make him less attractive to suitors though, I thought £60m was excessive when the spurs news broke.

 

If he (and they) have a poor season it’s possible no one wants him, especially if others impress at World Cup. 
 

It’s risky from Forest, I would have taken the £60m and reinvested.

 

Clubs won’t do business with them if they aren’t careful.

I don’t think losing Elanga and MGW was in their plans, so have took the gamble paying a high wage to keep the latter.

 

Could backfire. Wait and see.

[teblin]

[slymunn]

1 hour ago, Jazzy_Jeff said:

Might make him less attractive to suitors though, I thought £60m was excessive when the spurs news broke.

 

If he (and they) have a poor season it’s possible no one wants him, especially if others impress at World Cup. 
 

It’s risky from Forest, I would have taken the £60m and reinvested.

 

Clubs won’t do business with them if they aren’t careful.

This is the kind of deals we did, before starting to lose players for nothing a couple of years later.

[BKLFox]

Forest are doing what Leicester did in sticking rather than twisting, they will now have more players above the £100kpw threshold than we ever did & yet only off the back of 1 weird season and more than likely only a small run in Europe.

This will bite them I believe as Man U and Spurs will be back and the table will look more like what we could all predict with top 7 being sown-up & the 8th slot being a wild card which I don’t see as Forest.

With the 3 clubs promoted spending especially Leeds and Sunderland and a lot of key players being sold from the wild card clubs it’s probably that we don’t see those 3 go straight back down with the gap between 8/9th closer to 18th than it has been.

[Grebfromgrebland]

I think TV money will be bigger this year in the prem do they might be ok.

[Muzzy_no7]

Another stinky transfer saving Chelsea’s bacon 

[DLH]

1 hour ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

Another stinky transfer saving Chelsea’s bacon 

It’s amazing how many players they buy and then,  can turn a profit, without them really featuring for Chelsea.

 

Either a stroke of genius or incredible good fortune.

[Muzzy_no7]

13 minutes ago, DLH said:

It’s amazing how many players they buy and then,  can turn a profit, without them really featuring for Chelsea.

 

Either a stroke of genius or incredible good fortune.

It’s corrupt between some of the big clubs and Middle East. No doubt 

[Scotch]

Charlie Kelman to Charlton for £3.5m. 

 

I have to say, I'd have been tempted to take a chance on him for that. Great numbers last year in leagie 1 and still relatively young at 23. 

[Lambert09]

18 minutes ago, Scotch said:

Charlie Kelman to Charlton for £3.5m. 

 

I have to say, I'd have been tempted to take a chance on him for that. Great numbers last year in leagie 1 and still relatively young at 23. 

Got to imagine he’s not shown Marti much while he was there. 3.5 is nothing for that amount of goals so it will be interesting to see how he gets on

[Scotch]

11 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:

Got to imagine he’s not shown Marti much while he was there. 3.5 is nothing for that amount of goals so it will be interesting to see how he gets on

He has been out on loan the entire time Marti was there. It would be interesting to know how much say he had on him going to Orient in the summer. 

[Cincinnati Fox]

Southampton selling a shite defender for 7.5m (and not to us)

take note JR!!!

Edited 27 July 2025 by Cincinnati Fox

[UniFox21]

7 minutes ago, Cincinnati Fox said:

Southampton selling a shite defender for 7.5m (and not to us)

take note JR!!!

Infuriating right? We can't seem to sell anyone for anything 

 

 

[DezFox]

Becuase rudkin would want 12 and they would say no, he would then think he is saving face and doing the club proud but I’m reality he is destroying it one action at a time. Hate is a strong word but I hate rudkin. 

Edited 27 July 2025 by DezFox

[LestaLad]

Thing is a lot of their contracts expire next year, so we’re gonna lose them for free, so just get what you can.

[Md9]

We must be the most boring team for transfers in the last few years no one in and can’t get anyone out. 

[Dan]

1 hour ago, Cincinnati Fox said:

Southampton selling a shite defender for 7.5m (and not to us)

take note JR!!!

It's impossible to sell these crap players apparently.

[Ric Flair]

3 minutes ago, Dan said:

It's impossible to sell these crap players apparently.

I wonder what on earth goes through our prospective new managers minds during the interviews and negotiations when it becomes abundantly clear that their objectives and targets rely on their boss to sell players that he's never been able to do at the required level. 

 

I wonder if any have ever flagged this during discussions..... 😂