Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
41 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

I think you’re right. They know what’s coming. Hence why they aren’t doing any business other than the odd loan. 

Surely if that’s the case, then why haven’t the EFL announce it. The EFL would chumping to charge us!

Posted
24 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

Either him shooting this down or massively lowering expectations

 

 

It’s a player being forced onto him. With rumours it’s awaiting his approval and now comments like this. Cifeuntes has lost faith in super scout Glover

  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

Either him shooting this down or massively lowering expectations

 

 

I know they had two friendlies, but Bodo certainly looked fit and ready last night.... I guess that's what a good manager gets you though.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

It’s a player being forced onto him. With rumours it’s awaiting his approval and now comments like this. Cifeuntes has lost faith in super scout Glover

Or his agents want him to push through ANOTHER of their clients instead...

Posted
5 minutes ago, Tuna said:

 

TBF to Marti and his inimitable "Football Bingo BS"   That adaptation to the Championship means the wind and the rain which our current players couldn't manage last night according to their "manager".

As well as the fact that the Scandi players who have had a 6 week holiday will be a few months behind that shower on the pitch last night, who Jordan James aside, have been on holiday since early August.

Posted

I cannot fathom out why we'd agree a fee for a player that the manager is extremely unsure on. Talk about a disconnect. This is a market that Cifuentes is majorly experienced in as well.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

I cannot fathom out why we'd agree a fee for a player that the manager is extremely unsure on. Talk about a disconnect. This is a market that Cifuentes is majorly experienced in as well.


 

I guess they wanted the deals lined up ready for the managers ‘ok’ so it could get completed quickly

 

 

 

however,  that would involve pre-planning and I’m not sure we’re actually  capable of that.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

They have his replacement lined up and confirmed
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Salter

 

very interesting signing he’s playing in the Canadian Premier League. If this is the calibre of player they will be taking as a replacement it is a bit puzzling. It’s a 8 team league which I would call semi pro with majority of the players having regular jobs. 
 

Mid 20s who never had any solid offers in MLS and didn’t appear in any of Canadian youth teams at any age.

Edited by Molson Canadian
Posted
8 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

My personal opinion is, the club already know the outcome. 

Absolutely.  Talks will be well underway with the deduction being negotiated.  Deal done by the time it is announced.  They will not want to be embarrassed again by our legal team.

Posted
10 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

I cannot fathom out why we'd agree a fee for a player that the manager is extremely unsure on. Talk about a disconnect. This is a market that Cifuentes is majorly experienced in as well.

Weirder that they would ask the opinion of a manager this far out of his depth.

 

 

Posted
27 minutes ago, kenny said:

Weirder that they would ask the opinion of a manager this far out of his depth.

I'm not sure it's preferable to give free rein to the people who have governed our recruitment for the past few years. And by that I'm not only referring to Glover.

 

I have no reason to believe that any of our managers since Puel have any great pedigree as team-builders. But if you look at our recruitment since the FA Cup win, under five different managers, it's been abysmal. It's also a myth that it was any good under Maresca, when the money was spent on Coady/Winks/Cannon and a host of others who have shown glimpses of quality without consistently looking likely to make the transition to top level football. It's hard to argue that a group of people, none of which have ever managed and most of which have questionable credentials in the game, are the ones who should have a greater say on recruitment than any one of five different managers. Some of which have had decent careers in management and whose input at least carries some weight.

 

I'm utterly underwhelmed by Cifuentes. I wouldn't want to say he's never going to make it at this level (he kind of did, more or less), just that he's no more likely to be successful with us than anyone else who's going to be interested in the job right now. But we can't keep dismissing all of these managers as total no-hopers whose input should be discarded in favour of Rudkin and co. continuing to run amok with our recruitment. Yes, there are managers out there who could do a lot better - but hardly any of them would want to come, and if they did, our board would fail to identify them. 

 

It's hard to adapt to this reality because until recently we were a club capable of attracting top manager. Now, Cifuentes is the calibre of boss we can expect, give or take a little. Yes, he looks like he's flailing, but when that applies to so many consecutive bosses you have to start looking for the common denominators. And, preferably, not encourage them to carry on doing as they see fit with the club.

  • Like 2
Posted
45 minutes ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

I’ve been told this is done but we need to move one more out first. 

One more of the high wage earners?

Posted
4 hours ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

I’ve been told this is done but we need to move one more out first. 

Close the thread then. We’ve burnt the bridge with Wrexham who are the only club we could have hoped to sign any of our overpaid crap.  

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...