Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

He has really simplified the way we play, we are more solid but look to be more positive and direct when in possession without playing hoofball. 6 points from 5 games is a  steady return given the circumstances. Only one blot so far at home to Norwich, really need to follow tonight up with another win on Saturday. 
 

My only concern at the moment is his reluctance to give many of our younger players meaningful minutes. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Suuuuper super gaz!! 
 

still a long way to go, but day by day he’s chipping away at us and improving areas of our game, this was the first match we really put it into a 90 minute performance. Defended decently for us, attacked and created chances, dealt with pressure well, an all round good performance. 
 

I won’t quote James Maddison but you know where I’m going. 

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

He has really simplified the way we play, we are more solid but look to be more positive and direct when in possession without playing hoofball. 6 points from 5 games is a  steady return given the circumstances. Only one blot so far at home to Norwich, really need to follow tonight up with another win on Saturday. 
 

My only concern at the moment is his reluctance to give many of our younger players meaningful minutes. 

It’s amazing isn’t it, we’ve simplified the game, gone more direct in transition and we don’t pass the ball sideways for the sake of passing, and instead of the route one 90s football that so many fans accused people of wanting, it’s actually resulted in a more entertaining match.

 

 

  • Like 4
Posted

Knows the league, knows the level, knows what’s required, knows what works and what doesn’t.

 

Marti should have known these things too coming from Q.P.R. But maybe he thought the, ahem, “premier League quality” in the squad would negate the need to be hard working scrappers :dunno:.

  • Like 2
Posted

1 thing I’m thankful of is that he’s obviously sat them all down and said this is football and we tackle with our feet not our Fec’ing hands so stop grabbing, pulling and pushing your not 9.

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

He has really simplified the way we play, we are more solid but look to be more positive and direct when in possession without playing hoofball. 6 points from 5 games is a  steady return given the circumstances. Only one blot so far at home to Norwich, really need to follow tonight up with another win on Saturday. 
 

My only concern at the moment is his reluctance to give many of our younger players meaningful minutes. 

He's come in to save our season and keep us up. None of the younger players have really done much. Maybe they'll get a go when we're safe.

  • Like 1
Posted

The state of all those tantrums in here upon seeing the lineup. 
 

3 games in space of 7 days, there will always be rotation. Ayew vs Daka is just ‘pick your flavour of crap’. 
 

but at home, against teams that won’t give us space it’s Daka running into space that isn’t there or Ayew who can at least control the ball. 
 

Mukasa a passenger at home vs Norwich so understandable the ‘experience’ of BDCR is preferred (even though he had another poor game in the end, losing possession in dangerous areas multiple times). 
 

James and Skipp a better pairing and let’s Winks come off the bench to calm and control the game. 

  • Like 3
Posted

That pen goes in and it’s a different game. Felt he should have made subs much earlier as we were failing to progress the ball and falling deeper. 
not clear why Mukasa out of favour?

Posted

The football definitely isn’t as bad as some fans of his ex clubs have said. I actually think we’ve played some entertaining stuff under him. Looking a bit more directly. 
 

Also realise it’s been 5 games and I also wanted him fired into the sun after seeing Reid & Ayew in that line up but trying to be positive lol 

  • Like 3
Posted

Any manager coming into us in the mess we are in are going to go with experienced players even though majority of them are shit. 
They are not going to risk younger players with where we are currently. 
Hindsight is a wonderful thing but we should have built a side around the younger players at the start of the season. 
Will be interesting to see if and it’s a big if we stop up and he remains which direction he goes with. 
His track record suggests it’ll be experience instead of youth. 
I would rather we go with youth whatever division we are in next season. 

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, MPH said:

The meltdown on this thread before the game was fantastic lol

Justified as Ayew and Reid had little to no positive impact on the game. That was the main gripe 

  • Like 2
Posted

I really think we need some stability, if he keeps us up I'd give him a 2 year contract, first year clear out more deadwood, change the mentality, stabilise in the championship, 2nd year goal would be promotion to premiership, even if he took us up to Premiership, I'd make him reinterview as the possibility of candidates is far greater at that point, if we went down to league 1 I'd actually still offer him a 1 year contract, if things keep trending like the first 5 games, say we go down but it's close. 

Posted
12 hours ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

The state of all those tantrums in here upon seeing the lineup. 
 

3 games in space of 7 days, there will always be rotation. Ayew vs Daka is just ‘pick your flavour of crap’. 
 

but at home, against teams that won’t give us space it’s Daka running into space that isn’t there or Ayew who can at least control the ball. 
 

Mukasa a passenger at home vs Norwich so understandable the ‘experience’ of BDCR is preferred (even though he had another poor game in the end, losing possession in dangerous areas multiple times). 
 

James and Skipp a better pairing and let’s Winks come off the bench to calm and control the game. 

Daka didn't need to be rotated, he's only started 13 games all season. Every time the wingers broke they had no option centrally as Ayew was miles behind the play. BDCR usually was too.

 

As soon as Daka and Mukasa were on we just looked far more like an actual team.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Stadt said:

Justified as Ayew and Reid had little to no positive impact on the game. That was the main gripe 

Justified if it was Cifuentes who was the manager, maybe.

 

Is Rowett currently undefeated?

Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, Stadt said:

Daka didn't need to be rotated, he's only started 13 games all season. Every time the wingers broke they had no option centrally as Ayew was miles behind the play. BDCR usually was too.

 

As soon as Daka and Mukasa were on we just looked far more like an actual team.

We attacked better and scored the actual goals of the game with Ayew and Reid on the pitch. Obviously hard to divorce that from the way the match played out (i.e when we're 2-0 up with 30 mins to go the whole match has a different complexion). But I don't remember us having better play or attacks after Daka came on. I'd be interested in the respective stats of Ayew and Daka last night because based on the 'eyeball test' I remember Ayew controlling it in tight areas multiple times, which allowed attacks to continue (thinking that Daka would have never controlled it in the same way) and can't really remember any contribution of note from Daka. He had that terrible shot from 25 yards which dribbled slowly into the keeper's hands. 

 

Edit: for clarity - I think Daka and Ayew are both really poor in their respective ways, so I'm not passionate on one being better than the other or that one should/shouldn't be getting minutes. But think Ayew was much better suited to last night's game than Daka, especially in the first 60 mins. That was clearly Rowett's plan and it worked too. 

Edited by Les-TA-Jon

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...