Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Throwing Leuven in as well makes it much more appealing to a multi club group. You have a (weak) but pre-established link between a club with top 8 PL facilities and lets say a top 25-50 academy in the world and a club close to breakeven in the top 8 European leagues.

 

If you had deep-ish pockets (for a football club owner) a relatively modest 3-5 year investment and you have a top half PL club and a Europa/Conference Belgian one. In the mean time syndicating processes, software, scouting networks and so makes it easier. You only have to look at Midtjylland and USG to see how quickly smart smart clubs make a dent at the the top end of these leagues.

 

The name recognition is huge and maybe I'm overrating it but 99.99% of clubs in world football nobody has ever heard of, even in L1 we're part of that 0.01% - which if you're looking to purchase a club that is pretty appealing. Based on all this the Manceuto link sort of makes the most sense for me.  

  • Like 3
Posted
35 minutes ago, Miquel The Work Geordie said:

 

Wanking with sandpaper is better than wanking with a cheese grater, doesn't mean I wanna do it 

Depends on the grit level

  • Haha 4
Posted
1 hour ago, RedSoxUK said:

What’s up, Foxes fans! We didn’t get a copy of the deck, but Anthony reassured us the club is actively listening to offers. I actually reached out to my buddy Todd Boehly over at Chelsea, and he’s super interested in doing a full buyout.

Honestly, bringing in an American ownership group like Todd’s could be a massive win for the franchise. We're talking serious front office investment, roster retooling, and bringing that elite USA sports business playbook straight to the near London Leicestershire Foxes. Definitely something to keep an eye on as the front office navigates this acquisition phase.

I sang this to the tune of Bran Van 3000 - Drinkin in LA

  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, AKCJ said:

Chelsea fans hate him because he isn't craving instant success.

 

He's built a team of kids that should be ready to compete in 3/4 years whereas their fans want someone ready for now.

I think the £700m+ debt reportedly that needs to be paid by next year or the £1.2bn debt in the next five years is a feature for their hate as well. 

  • Like 3
Posted

As much as I want the club to be sold, I would really question whether I would still support us if we were taken over by Red Bull. This isn't for ethical reasons. I know that most parties with the capital required to buy professional football clubs in England have probably got skeletons in their closet, and Red Bull would not be the most unethical buyer possible. It's that the football club that I support still has to resemble Leicester City. Red Bull have gone into football clubs in the past, changed the colours and badge and have incorporated their name an branding into the name of the club. At that point I would no longer be a fan of Leicester City, I'd be a fan of soft drink company that has a football club in Leicester.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Death by Football said:

I completely agree with everything you say about not wanting Red Bull but walk into the King Power Stadium and try and find some evidence that you are a fan of Leicester City and not a badly run duty free monopoly from Thailand that has a football club in Leicester. There's nothing - it's just King Power branding everywhere. 

You're right, and I'm not going to defend them. However, we are still called Leicester City, we still play in blue and the badge is still a fox and a cinque foil. The basic resemblance is still there. 

  • Like 1
Posted

So you’re a fan of the badge and the name, not the club and what it represents - which it can do in any colour and with a pink lizard as its logo, if it wants. 
Not trying to be confrontational, honestly, just genuinely curious why you think a badge represents the club more than its actual history, achievements, place in community etc etc.

For me, I’d like it to stay the same, but I don’t think I’d care that much if it didn’t. Maybe I’m in the minority - not that it matters either way! 😂🤷

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, BenTheFox said:

As much as I want the club to be sold, I would really question whether I would still support us if we were taken over by Red Bull. This isn't for ethical reasons. I know that most parties with the capital required to buy professional football clubs in England have probably got skeletons in their closet, and Red Bull would not be the most unethical buyer possible. It's that the football club that I support still has to resemble Leicester City. Red Bull have gone into football clubs in the past, changed the colours and badge and have incorporated their name a branding into the name of the club. At that point I would no longer be a fan of Leicester City, I'd be a fan of soft drink company that has a football club in Leicester.

 Is RB Leicester city a problem if we still play in blue and the badge doesn’t change ?

Edited by st albans fox
  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Lineker's Left Foot said:

Talking about Todd Boehly, there’s talk from one of the Leuven fans on their thread in this forum,  that according to a very reliable source, Boehly is interested in purchasing us.

Slight correction (as it was me): Boehly has had talks with KP in the past regarding a potential takeover of Leicester and OHL. Not sure whether him and Walter meaning to sell their stake in Chelsea means anything, but it's an odd coincidence at least.

  • Like 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, BenTheFox said:

You're right, and I'm not going to defend them. However, we are still called Leicester City, we still play in blue and the badge is still a fox and a cinque foil. The basic resemblance is still there. 

The badge has change 3 times whilst I've been going and we were once know as Leicester Fosse like @TrentFox I wouldn't want it to change.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, RedSoxUK said:

What’s up, Foxes fans! We didn’t get a copy of the deck, but Anthony reassured us the club is actively listening to offers. I actually reached out to my buddy Todd Boehly over at Chelsea, and he’s super interested in doing a full buyout.

Honestly, bringing in an American ownership group like Todd’s could be a massive win for the franchise. We're talking serious front office investment, roster retooling, and bringing that elite USA sports business playbook straight to the near London Leicestershire Foxes. Definitely something to keep an eye on as the front office navigates this acquisition phase.

Can we throw in a few bridges too? Red Hill Way Flyover is impressive, if they push hard maybe the Bow Bridge too

Posted

I think the colours are hugely important. Its part of your identity.

That's why I'd prefer away kit to always be yellow or white, sash kit is acceptable too. Also why i'm not frothing at the mouth for the burgundy kit. Surely big companies should be all over it too, brand recognition and everything. 

Posted
33 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

 Is RB Leicester city a problem if we still play in blue and the badge doesn’t change ?

Putting their company in the club name would be an issue for me, yes. 

  • Like 4
Posted
23 minutes ago, davieG said:

The badge has change 3 times whilst I've been going and we were once know as Leicester Fosse like @TrentFox I wouldn't want it to change.

The difference is those were design changes. That can happen. However, if they changed the badge to have red bull logo, then that is a completely different story. 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, AKCJ said:

Chelsea fans hate him because he isn't craving instant success.

 

He's built a team of kids that should be ready to compete in 3/4 years whereas their fans want someone ready for now.

 

8 hours ago, Officer Doofy said:

I don't think that was his intention. He signed everyone under the sun when he first got there thinking he could just buy the success. 

I think his intention was actually just to hoover up the young talent to flip later on for profits. Im not sure success on the pitch has been that much of a factor in the signings they've made. Its been a case of trying to sign the next big thing before they're the next big thing and make big profits. But its been way too scattergun.

Posted

The thought of any connection to the vile Dodgers (owned by Boehly) sickens me.

 

Awful scummy club, who threw thousands of people out of their homes to build their ballpark, fans have assaulted visiting Giants fans and have now broken baseball by cheating salary rules by termination it "deferred consideration"

 

I still wake up in a cold fever sometimes having nightmares about this...

 

image.png.d4a2563750153b903188d7acd72835bc.png

Posted
10 minutes ago, Golden Fox said:

The thought of any connection to the vile Dodgers (owned by Boehly) sickens me.

 

Awful scummy club, who threw thousands of people out of their homes to build their ballpark, fans have assaulted visiting Giants fans and have now broken baseball by cheating salary rules by termination it "deferred consideration"

 

I still wake up in a cold fever sometimes having nightmares about this...

 

image.png.d4a2563750153b903188d7acd72835bc.png

They're not jammy? :P 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...