Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Miquel The Work Geordie said:

 

Rightly dropped yes, but not regardless of who comes in I'm afraid. Faes should be nowhere near the club and after all the rimming the higher ups did over a window well done the fact he's still turning out for us is absolutely shambolic.

From Stade Louis II in Monaco to Oakwell in Barnsley.   Some sort of karma there. Isn't Martin a Buddhist? 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ChrisFilter said:

I don’t really care about Faes being in. Maybe he’s trained well, maybe he’s been in good spirits, maybe he’s well up for it. 

See how in good spirits and well up for it he is when he's been booed every time he touches the ball for a bit.

 

Absolute madness to bring him in when you're struggling to get the fans onside yourself.

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Stuntman_Mike said:

Martin did say Faes was a great human being and a fantastic pro, so it's no surprise seeing him back in as he didn't get a move..

So a c?nt thinks a c£nt is an ok bloke!?!

  • Haha 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, LCFC1996 said:

On one hand he probably does suit this style of play much better than any other centre back we've got...

He does, but he’s also a capital C ****

Posted

It to me just further highlights that he doesn’t know what he is doing. The bloke is a complete fraud. We might win today, but it will be completely unconvincing and we will be the worse team….. but we stand every chance of not winning thanks to the flower brained idiot we have in the dugout. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, ChrisFilter said:

don’t really care about Faes being in. Maybe he’s trained well, maybe he’s been in good spirits, maybe he’s well up for it

It does just go to show that the standards are so far from what they should be that he can just snake his way back in. 

 

Mind you, we gave the captaincy to a guy who angled for a move to Sheff Utd during the window so it didn't need Faes starting to demonstrate that really. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Rubbersoul said:

Keep forgetting about Doyle. 
 

Having 7 subs is proper shit because players you actually want to see miss out for the likes of Faes, Thomas, Reid & Burns 

Don't get why we need both Burns and Howell on the bench. Should be Howell only (would prefer him to start tbh). Reeks of keeping Burns happy even though he has been hopeless. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

This was coming from the moment Martin gave that interview about experience.  If he doesn’t win today it’s curtains.  Unfortunately I expect us to scrape through and delay the inevitable.

Posted

Faes back. Why? I think this is a big mistake. We are trying to create a new squad/team ethic and now bring him back. I have seen nothing in him to suggest he is going to change his attitude. Give it 20 minutes and his arm will be flapping around.

 

I may be wrong and hope I am, but he would not be near the team if I was the manager. You have to set standards.

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

Feel bad for Kangasniemi, McFarlane, Kamari Doyle and Bristric.

 

Brought in by a club that just throws shit at a wall and sees what sticks in terms of transfers.

Both dropped for non football reasons, people can't moan about the crap culture and then complain when a manager does thing about it.

Edited by coolhandfox
  • Like 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Pliskin said:

It to me just further highlights that he doesn’t know what he is doing. The bloke is a complete fraud. We might win today, but it will be completely unconvincing and we will be the worse team….. but we stand every chance of not winning thanks to the flower brained idiot we have in the dugout. 

100% the club will be pushing this and he’s yielded. 

Posted

So, IF you had to play one or the other who would you play Faes or Thomas?

Might be a c**t but Faes all day long for me.

 

  • Like 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...