Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That bench is absolutely fine if you're cruising and want a load of options to save the legs of the starting XI and accept you're finished offering a threat. I worry if there's a need to freshen up the side and change a game, there's literally not a single player there I'd look to. Surely there's room for a Howell or Bristric rather than 4 cloggers for 2 positions across the midfield? 

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Stevosevic said:

Turning out to be bad loan moves for Howell and Watson you would think…


Watson has been awful. Doesn't even look like a footballer. I'd send him back to get his wages off our books.  

Howell could be useful if we start picking up injuries. 

Posted
1 minute ago, jv1 said:

No it isn’t in league one - Behave ric 

Burns, Chaplin, Cullen and Cordova Reid would take us to league 2 if they had any significant minutes.

 

You cant evaluate players on past performances, all have looked honking at this level.

  • Like 1
Posted

He really doesn’t want his mates to be left out the squad, huh. If we need 4 attacking midfielders and a winger who cant run, then we’re all set.

 

Good to keep the same side though.

Posted
5 minutes ago, PaulW said:

And your favoured bench would be....?

Park, Work and Garden for me.

  • Haha 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, PaulW said:

And your favoured bench would be....?

Some variety to it! Benches are to change games. There are no game changers on there.

 

Do you get paid by the club to defend every single thing by the way? 

Posted
1 minute ago, LCFCJohn said:

Some variety to it! Benches are to change games. There are no game changers on there.

 

Do you get paid by the club to defend every single thing by the way? 

No, but I do get hugely irritated when people make swingeing criticisms without offering an alternative.  Plus I'm a miserable old git.

Posted
9 minutes ago, PaulW said:

And your favoured bench would be....?

maybe having more than 5 proper footballers on it, and not having 57% of it be all the same position.

 

Like take out Cullen, Bob the nob and replace them with Bristric and Aluko and all of a sudden we've got actual cover in each position and aren't playing shit cams up front if Riis gets injured after 10 minutes 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Wonder if bench get extra payment for getting on the pitch, and RM is on a cut. Can't think of any other sensible conclusion. Cock-up or conspiracy. Your choice.

Edited by FoxFossil
Posted

Feels like a big game. Win it and we may have genuinely turned a corner- Brussell might win a few over and we go into two home games with a more positive and supportive atmosphere. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, PaulW said:

No, but I do get hugely irritated when people make swingeing criticisms without offering an alternative.  Plus I'm a miserable old git.

People are saying the line up looks good but disappointed with the bench which is fair enough. It’s not negative, it’s balanced.

 

For me, Cullen, BDR and Chaplin are too similar. Really we shouldn’t have signed Cullen and Chaplin as well as having BDR on the books. It is a waste of resources.

 

In terms of differences. I’d have Bristvic on the bench. At least he’s a natural striker and he won’t come good with no minutes. Another bad signing if we aren’t even going to try and get something out of him.

 

I think Howell also offers more than Burns so would have him there as at least he he might change the change if we needed it.

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...