Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
jonthefox

The "do they mean us?" thread

By jonthefox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

filbertway

filbertway

Posted
Posted

The best thing about that is apparent "stay at home" full-back Christian Fuchs creating the second most number of chances for a full back all season...

Going to happen when you are one of the main set piece takers for your team.

  • Popular Post
MrSpaM

MrSpaM

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)

 

Found this hilarious lol

 

Theres some pretty funny videos of our squad in Thailand on that youtube channel

Edited by MrSpaM
  • Like 7
Langston

Langston

Posted
Posted

Didn't know Matt Smith (actor) was on trial with the u16's and had to leave due to a back injury - a question on which club he had a trial at on 'Pressure Pad' gameshow.

 

Wasn't just on trial, was he? Thought he captained a youth side at one point?

Nalis

Nalis

Posted
Posted

A single vote separated the goal of the season.

As good as Vardy's goal was, I still think Martina's v Arsenal was better.

Sublime_Coatsworth

Sublime_Coatsworth

Posted
Posted

You posted this in the wrong place

P.S don't read shit newspapers

It's about one of our players, i.e 'us'

If we can't post articles from shit newspapers this thread would be pretty short (sun, mirror, express, mail, star, etc. etc.).

Thanks for your post.

  • Like 3
davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted

guys

I need some good articles(or anything) about club history

pls help

You could start by looking in the History section of foxestalk see tab at the top of the page.

tsintskaro

tsintskaro

Posted
Posted

You could start by looking in the History section of foxestalk see tab at the top of the page.

 

ah,thx

nice statistics 

but i need more than numbers

Hungry Hungry Fox

Hungry Hungry Fox

Posted
Posted

It's about one of our players, i.e 'us'

If we can't post articles from shit newspapers this thread would be pretty short (sun, mirror, express, mail, star, etc. etc.).

Thanks for your post.

Don't transfer stories go in the transfer thread?

jit

jit

Posted
Posted

We've won the Premier League. That is absolutely ridiculous. Farcical.

 

Wake up, dilly ding dilly dong. We're champions of England. Pot 1 seed in the CL. 

 

We're fuching massive.

davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted

Leicester City Least Of The Big Spenders

1464002760_313.jpg

Thu 1st Jan 1970 | Money & Finance

Leicester City spent the least on player transfers according to figures released by CIES today.

The newly crowned Premier League Champions spent on average £1.8m (€2.7m) per player. 

Conversely, relegated Newcastle United could not avoid the drop despite having the 8th costliest line-up at £6.1m (€7.9m) per player.

The figures reported by the CIES Football Observatory showed Manchester City at £21.3m (€27.5m) and Manchester United at £20.1m (€26.8m) had the most costly assembled squads in the Premier League. However, this was dwarfed by Real Madrid with the most expensive line-up in European football at £24m (€32.2m) per player.

These were followed by Paris St-Germain (€27.0m) and Barcelona (€23.7m) whilst Champions League finalists Atlético Madrid ranked 13th (€8.8m).

Of the four other major European championships, the most positive and negative gaps between the position in the transfer cost ranking and that achieved in the final table were measured for Las Palmas (+6) and Valencia (-9) in Spain; Angers (+8) and Marseille (-10) in France; Mainz (+10) and Hannover (-9) in Germany; as well as for Empoli (+7) and Palermo (-5) in Italy.

Raw Dykes

Raw Dykes

Posted
Posted

Leicester City Least Of The Big Spenders

1464002760_313.jpg

Thu 1st Jan 1970 | Money & Finance

Leicester City spent the least on player transfers according to figures released by CIES today.

The newly crowned Premier League Champions spent on average £1.8m (€2.7m) per player. 

Conversely, relegated Newcastle United could not avoid the drop despite having the 8th costliest line-up at £6.1m (€7.9m) per player.

The figures reported by the CIES Football Observatory showed Manchester City at £21.3m (€27.5m) and Manchester United at £20.1m (€26.8m) had the most costly assembled squads in the Premier League. However, this was dwarfed by Real Madrid with the most expensive line-up in European football at £24m (€32.2m) per player.

These were followed by Paris St-Germain (€27.0m) and Barcelona (€23.7m) whilst Champions League finalists Atlético Madrid ranked 13th (€8.8m).

Of the four other major European championships, the most positive and negative gaps between the position in the transfer cost ranking and that achieved in the final table were measured for Las Palmas (+6) and Valencia (-9) in Spain; Angers (+8) and Marseille (-10) in France; Mainz (+10) and Hannover (-9) in Germany; as well as for Empoli (+7) and Palermo (-5) in Italy.

 

 

It's pretty old, that, Davie.

  • Like 3
jbloggs

jbloggs

Posted
Posted

Keith Vaz is one of our biggest supporters, about as true as me dating Megan Fox !

 

He is probably a "back bencher" in the stadium :P

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...