Corky Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 Oh, and surprise surprise, yet another article on Football365 downplaying a Leicester player's achievements this season. Apparently the fact that Drinkwater "only performs when next to Kante" is reason enough for him to be left out. It's Sarah Winterburn mainly who has the issues with us.
AjcW Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 We could basically play this team. So would you be happy with this?100% I just know we won't given the players he's chosen.
Donut Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 I think the biggest problem is were basically rubbish. Whoevers in charge, whatever formation we play. Eriksson- Yeah hes rubbish McLaren- Yeah hes rubbish Capello- Yeah hes rubbish Hodgson- Yeah hes rubbish In short, everything associated with England has been rubbish pretty much forever.
Meltonfossefox Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 Wouldn't surprise me one little bit. I made the point about a week ago that Woy just doesn't rate City or our players. Despite winning the league actually at a canter. The video footage of his daft face over the season when Vardy has scored goals HAS been quite conclusive. He's not been overjoyed. Quite the contrary, his look is that of a man who looks pissed off because Vardy's form has almost forced him to include him. I think Vardy will possibly start the first game BUT if he 'under performs' Hodgson will drop him as soon as he possibly can. Call me paranoid but I firmly believe this. I said a few weeks ago that DD was playing until Henderson was available, I got it wrong it was until Henderson and Wiltshire were fit then said the same about vardy waiting for sturridge or welbeck Couldn't agree more with vardy and his inclusion I think his hand is forced that's why he's played him. Keeps banging on about spuds great season not them bottling it when it matters
Guest ttfn Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 It's Sarah Winterburn mainly who has the issues with us. Guess who wrote this article....
1972 Fox Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 Wouldn't surprise me one little bit. I made the point about a week ago that Woy just doesn't rate City or our players. Despite winning the league actually at a canter. The video footage of his daft face over the season when Vardy has scored goals HAS been quite conclusive. He's not been overjoyed. Quite the contrary, his look is that of a man who looks pissed off because Vardy's form has almost forced him to include him. I think Vardy will possibly start the first game BUT if he 'under performs' Hodgson will drop him as soon as he possibly can. Call me paranoid but I firmly believe this. Hodgson will not pick Vardy to start the first game unless it is on the left side of a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1. He is such a negative Manager and is too set in his ways to change now. Personally I would prefer to see Vardy come on up front from the bench rather than start out of position.
st albans fox Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 A few have begun to realise that this is a shame for Danny personally but really of no consequence to us. we should be happy that one of our most important players will now be fit and raring to go for the new season. no chance of sufferings an injury comming on for no reason at the back end of a dead game. No chance of an injury whilst training for a tournement that probably wouldn't see him get much game time at all. and no chance of all the little rich kids whispering in his ear for another month about how badly rewarded he is here. Hopefully Roy will be sacked by July and a new manager comes in with a clean slate. next season, Henderson and Milner will be usurped by klopp's new signings and wilshere will be dead again.
HankMarvin Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 I think the biggest problem is were basically rubbish. Whoevers in charge, whatever formation we play. Eriksson- Yeah hes rubbish McLaren- Yeah hes rubbish Capello- Yeah hes rubbish Hodgson- Yeah hes rubbish In short, everything associated with England has been rubbish pretty much forever. Most successful nations realise this and have a total rebirth of talent, a la Germany and Spain's blueprint.
Socks Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 We all knew this was coming Hodgson is stubborn We will get out of the group and then go out in the next stage I gotta feeling this will be Woy's last tournament tbh I will still cheer the boys on, but hes made a massive mistake/gamble on sturridge & wilshere imo when you have DD whos been immense all season he will get slaughtered after the tournament.... like every other failure of an English manager has
Dr The Singh Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 I can't believe we're not talking about Kante not being in the England squad ffs
Meltonfossefox Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 It's not anti-England!!! It's anti the fvcking FA establishment and the way the fvck up everything they touch. Jobs for a bunch of over-paid tired old boys sitting on their fat arses in comfortable chairs, farting into cushions. Can't you see that? It's not about Vardy and DD - it's about the mediocrity of the England team without them - choosing competence over excellence. Maybe you think you've got a 'bigger picture' than the rest of us but you're not seeing that the FA aren't loyal to the best interests of our national game. City have provided them with a new blueprint of how football can be played and they've snubbed all that that could bring. Hodgson should have included DD AND Simpson. Anything to get that breath of fresh Leicester air into those fuggy old board rooms at Lancaster Gate. Couldn't agree more with Simpson too
fuchsntf Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 I want a journalist with balls, who enjoys putting league managers under interview pressure, come up with some hard questions on why hes taking unproved not match fit players. Like Sturridge, Wilshere, Henderson.Why totally out of form players like Barkley and Sterling get the nod over players like Drinkwater a Pl title winner who can feed both Kane and Vardy, Townsend who when in an England shirt was the monkey you wanted to be fed, and has found his form.Why Noble never got a look in. How Sterling whos never turned up in an English shirt gets automatic choice. Why Milner jumps in front of good young players. Why try and play a proven central striker on the wing and not pair ,the 2 best English strikers automatically together... Then with our defence problems I just might of accepted Carrick (no I dont like him) in the squad for his experience and cover for CB.. Why have the PL champions been pushed to the side to accomodate others who couldnt manage even a top 4 place... Yes where are those arrogant 'do or dare journalists' now..!!! Where are plans ABC coming from, why cant a top international manager think any further than Rashford. Where are the naughty ' dog gnawing at a bone' press boys now.. Why no questions n answers interviews
fuchsntf Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 It's not anti-England!!! It's anti the fvcking FA establishment and the way the fvck up everything they touch. Jobs for a bunch of over-paid tired old boys sitting on their fat arses in comfortable chairs, farting into cushions. Can't you see that? It's not about Vardy and DD - it's about the mediocrity of the England team without them - choosing competence over excellence. Maybe you think you've got a 'bigger picture' than the rest of us but you're not seeing that the FA aren't loyal to the best interests of our national game. City have provided them with a new blueprint of how football can be played and they've snubbed all that that could bring. Hodgson should have included DD AND Simpson. Anything to get that breath of fresh Leicester air into those fuggy old board rooms at Lancaster Gate.Might be built on and full of frustration..but still well said.We should be sending the SAS form players, not the worn out retreating troupes back into battle. Just hope Ali, Kane Vardy, with a returning to form Rooney can save our grace...
biggs Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 Since we got just about everything right once Claudio tinkered a little with our lineup our team included on a regular basis Drinky, Albrighton, Vardy and Simpson all of which played brilliantly. Compare those 4 players with the 5 players Spurs have going. I could argue ability and what each bring to the game but how about the mental side of this game? Which players showed the ability to handle the pressure when it counted? Not saying the 5 spurs players don't deserve their spot because they do but to deny some of our players a chance appears biased by the team name the players play for. As for Wilshire, I like him as a player and his toughness but wonder with a year off how he will be. Some of the selection to me is poor and believe Drinky should have made the team based on his performances this year and also his performance in his first International. Second half of the Australia game he picked it up too.
Socks Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 its not anti-england at all its the anger at fvking morons in charge of the English national side taking players to an international tournament who have hardly played a game all season and who have been injured and are very fragile rather than players who have been immense/ rock solid/ and fully fit all season Im also on the fence about Rashford not sure if he deserves to go or not ???
m4DD0gg Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 Its decided i am supporting Wales. Cant take any more of that pricks bullshit selection and formations.
The Doctor Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 - Rashford does absolutely nothing beyond scoring the one tap in and goes from someone just there for the international set-up experience to squad member. Milner, Barkley and Henderson all make the squad while Woy leaves out the only winger he actually named (while wanting to play 4-2-3-1), and one of the best performing English midfielders of the last 12 months. Classic piss-taking.
nativefox Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 I'm positive he'd have left Vardy out if he thought he could have gotten away with it. C£&k face.
spudfox2911 Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 Not looking forward to euros now.... honestly think he has blew it by that selection. I reckon he only took vards incase of backlash. What's the betting he put his arm round Danny to tell him the bad news and said "Now if you pwayed for wone of the big 4 I'd have took you, see if you can get a move in the summer," "Or I'll carrying on picking players who finished 8th in the league and played less than 90mins all season. They are a big club son.. i dont give a shit if leicester win the league by 10pts, go play for spurs, then youre nailed on son.. even though they somehow managed to come 3rd in a 2 horse race, big club you see, that young big black lad.... only played a few games, but he's man u u? Well you ain't son. Try the bench at arsenal, play 30odd mins all season win **** all, the plane tickets you're lad, but leicester? Nah chance"
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 Its decided i am supporting Wales. Cant take any more of that pricks bullshit selection and formations. Austria are a good shout aswellNo Fuchs Given
filbertway Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 Did a little squawka comparison on drinky and hendo on quite a few things like key passes, assists, chances created, tackles etc... They were actually fairly close on most stats. For me, that choice is only poor if Henderson has a recurrance of his injury and turns out to be a waste of a spot.
jayfox26 Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 I don't get the people who are saying Drinkwater hasn't done enough to be picked. He's played 2 games for England, 1 of which he was man of the match. And in the games he's played I don't see how any of the other midfielders (except Alli) have done anything better than Drinkwater.
Tielemans63 Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 To not take a single recognised winger in the 23 is an astonishing decision IMHO. I'm gutted for DD but you could argue the decision to leave out an in-form Andros Townsend is a bigger decision. Genuinely hope Roy makes us doubters look like absolute twats though. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
Tielemans63 Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 Did a little squawka comparison on drinky and hendo on quite a few things like key passes, assists, chances created, tackles etc... They were actually fairly close on most stats. For me, that choice is only poor if Henderson has a recurrance of his injury and turns out to be a waste of a spot. My brother in law is a massive Liverpool fan and the word up there is that Henderson's foot injury is chronic and the guy's career is in the balance.Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
HankMarvin Posted 31 May 2016 Posted 31 May 2016 My brother in law is a massive Liverpool fan and the word up there is that Henderson's foot injury is chronic and the guy's career is in the balance. Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk on the plane to make jack feel better
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.