RoyFox Posted 17 November 2016 Posted 17 November 2016 46 minutes ago, smudgerfox said: I think it would be worth playing just Vardy up front in a 433. Genius Thanks
Nalis Posted 17 November 2016 Posted 17 November 2016 Kasper trained as an outfield player, maybe he's the answer to our central midfield conundrum.
themightyfin Posted 17 November 2016 Posted 17 November 2016 1 hour ago, smudgerfox said: I think it would be worth playing just Vardy up front in a 433. Genius 4-3-3 does that not mean 3. Upfront? But you want just vardy? Genius
norwichfox Posted 17 November 2016 Posted 17 November 2016 Kuputska plays midfield when playing for his country, maybe it's time to give him the "acid test" and see how he does, nowt to lose (other than a football match)
norwichfox Posted 17 November 2016 Posted 17 November 2016 1 hour ago, Nalis said: Kasper trained as an outfield player, maybe he's the answer to our central midfield conundrum. Could even borrow Vardy's blue cast from last season
RoyFox Posted 17 November 2016 Posted 17 November 2016 2 hours ago, themightyfin said: 4-3-3 does that not mean 3. Upfront? But you want just vardy? Genius Vardy furthest forward, so it would look more like 4-5-1. Who took the jam out of your doughnut!?
themightyfin Posted 17 November 2016 Posted 17 November 2016 3 minutes ago, RoyFox said: Vardy furthest forward, so it would look more like 4-5-1. Who took the jam out of your doughnut!? Ok so 4-5-1 not 4-3-3 like you first said. Doughnut
RoyFox Posted 17 November 2016 Posted 17 November 2016 2 minutes ago, themightyfin said: Ok so 4-5-1 not 4-3-3 like you first said. Doughnut Bit anal mate, whatever floats your boat
themightyfin Posted 17 November 2016 Posted 17 November 2016 1 minute ago, RoyFox said: Bit anal mate, whatever floats your boat Quite a statement from someone who thinks 1 and 3 are the same number. Too much puffing on the funny pipe me thinks or head stuck up an Ostrich back side maybe? Anyways....moving on
RoyFox Posted 17 November 2016 Posted 17 November 2016 5 minutes ago, themightyfin said: Quite a statement from someone who thinks 1 and 3 are the same number. Too much puffing on the funny pipe me thinks or head stuck up an Ostrich back side maybe? Anyways....moving on Well can't be perfect all the time can we? A bit like some of your ITK statements. Anyways...moving on
sylofox Posted 17 November 2016 Posted 17 November 2016 5 hours ago, smudgerfox said: I think it would be worth playing just Vardy up front in a 433. Genius Do league rules allow 4 keepers and who would the be?
TJB-fox Posted 17 November 2016 Posted 17 November 2016 1 hour ago, RoyFox said: Vardy furthest forward, so it would look more like 4-5-1. Who took the jam out of your doughnut!? You are correct mate because you don't have 3 ST's up front in a front 3 normally, you'd go with a ST and then two attacking wingers (RW LW) which is the system we'd undoubtedly use if we played 433 (not that I can see CR using it)
RoyFox Posted 18 November 2016 Posted 18 November 2016 5 hours ago, TJB-fox said: You are correct mate because you don't have 3 ST's up front in a front 3 normally, you'd go with a ST and then two attacking wingers (RW LW) which is the system we'd undoubtedly use if we played 433 (not that I can see CR using it) Exactly. Thanks mate.
foxfanazer Posted 18 November 2016 Posted 18 November 2016 We really need to put the champions league out of her heads for this one. One of the most disappointing things for me this season is we seem to be getting outworked and that just isn't acceptable. I just can't see us getting anything here I'm afraid. 2-1 Watford
norwichfox Posted 18 November 2016 Posted 18 November 2016 30 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: Harvey Barnes debut goal Yes Please....right work ethic and really looks the business.......
RoboFox Posted 18 November 2016 Posted 18 November 2016 13 hours ago, RoyFox said: Vardy furthest forward, so it would look more like 4-5-1. Who took the jam out of your doughnut!? 13 hours ago, themightyfin said: Ok so 4-5-1 not 4-3-3 like you first said. Doughnut 13 hours ago, RoyFox said: Bit anal mate, whatever floats your boat 13 hours ago, themightyfin said: Quite a statement from someone who thinks 1 and 3 are the same number. Too much puffing on the funny pipe me thinks or head stuck up an Ostrich back side maybe? Anyways....moving on 13 hours ago, RoyFox said: Well can't be perfect all the time can we? A bit like some of your ITK statements. Anyways...moving on
ealingfox Posted 18 November 2016 Posted 18 November 2016 Surprised both Lawro and Rick Astley reckon we'll be taking the points. If we play like we did at Spurs we'll get something. I fear he won't risk Drinkwater and if that's the case we really will need to play 3 in the middle, or Okazaki at the very least.
It'sblueupnorth Posted 18 November 2016 Posted 18 November 2016 5 minutes ago, ealingfox said: Surprised both Lawro and Rick Astley reckon we'll be taking the points. If we play like we did at Spurs we'll get something. I fear he won't risk Drinkwater and if that's the case we really will need to play 3 in the middle, or Okazaki at the very least. Are you really?
foxy boxing Posted 18 November 2016 Posted 18 November 2016 7 minutes ago, ealingfox said: Surprised both Lawro and Rick Astley reckon we'll be taking the points. If we play like we did at Spurs we'll get something. I fear he won't risk Drinkwater and if that's the case we really will need to play 3 in the middle, or Okazaki at the very least. Rick Astley was never gonna give up on us?
RoyFox Posted 18 November 2016 Posted 18 November 2016 Looks like they will be playing 3-5-2 tomorrow. Albrighton in to cover their wing back might be required.
filbertway Posted 18 November 2016 Posted 18 November 2016 Have absolutely no idea what to expect in this game. Will we collapse as we have done, will we turn up and fight, will the players remember they are footballers? Feels like ages since I had no idea what to expect from our team.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.