Bob Weasel Fox Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 Just now, Swan Lesta said: I keep rattling through various formations but am struggling to see how we play our best players and still keep the pace and width. It's just another option really i think babs is right we might set up differently for the difficult away game for example and then a more normal looking side for the home games perhaps?
psychonaut Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 2 minutes ago, Swan Lesta said: I keep rattling through various formations but am struggling to see how we play our best players and still keep the pace and width. 4-2-3-1 - IF we had a right back with pace.
FoxinNotts Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 I think we need to be a little cautious here. I'm not convinced this is gonna happen yet. Although there seems to be some insider knowledge on this forum, it seems strange that in, what is a relatively quiet window thus far, news outlets are mentioning nothing yet! Even if there was a sniff, you would have thought the sports pages would have picked up on it, and ran with it. They haven't. I don't think it is as close as we're thinking it is. I think we'll be doing abit on deadline day, personally.
lgfualol Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 7 minutes ago, Swan Lesta said: I keep rattling through various formations but am struggling to see how we play our best players and still keep the pace and width. Depends which players have decided they're "undroppable" or not. Personally I'd want 4231 Drinkwater Ndidi/Mendy Mahrez Ramirez Gray/Albrighton Slimani Bench: Zieler, Amartey, Fuchs, Ndidi/Mendy, Vardy, Albrighton, Okazaki You may say that there is not enough defensive cover with that front 4, but I think the threat of having those 3 players that can create and dribble past players will affect how teams play against us. We need to go all out for it if we want to stay up. Think most of the other squad are living off last season and we need to bin this long ball to Vardy quick.
Brooksy Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 Hopefully he'll give a shit and play with a desire to win a game. If so we only need 9 more players
STUHILL Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 20 minutes ago, Brooksy said: Hopefully he'll give a shit and play with a desire to win a game. If so we only need 9 more players Encouraged by reports that he wants the move. Shows good intent from him. Excited to see how we will play with a genuine no.10 for a change.
sylofox Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 seems Snodgrass is our key to this. Boro get him we get our guy.
norwichfox Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 If we sign him, what are the chances that Claudio will give him a start?....even on the bench? Slim....reluctant to use that word now.
LCFC hub Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 7 minutes ago, sylofox said: seems Snodgrass is our key to this. Boro get him we get our guy. Sounds like Snodgrass is going to Burnley
katieakita Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 Thought Boro were after Bojan and maybe we are sat waiting for other clubs to sort out replacements.
Fox92 Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 Hulll accept Burnley's £10mill bid for Snodgrass. That's who we should be going for.
john ridley Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 17 minutes ago, Fox92 said: Hulll accept Burnley's £10mill bid for Snodgrass. That's who we should be going for. Your right it should ,not keen on british players it seems .
cityfanlee23 Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 4-2-3-1 . Schmeichel Tripper Nastasic Evans Chilwell Ndidi Drink Ramirez Mahrez Albrighton Big Slim
Fox92 Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 1 minute ago, cityfanlee23 said: 4-2-3-1 . Schmeichel Tripper Nastasic Evans Chilwell Ndidi Drink Ramirez Mahrez Albrighton Big Slim I like your optimism.
TheSomersetFox Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 2 minutes ago, cityfanlee23 said: 4-2-3-1 . Schmeichel Tripper Nastasic Evans Chilwell Ndidi Drink Ramirez Mahrez Albrighton Big Slim the fvck you get them from?
Guest CityFan 06 Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 3 minutes ago, cityfanlee23 said: 4-2-3-1 . Schmeichel Tripper Nastasic Evans Chilwell Ndidi Drink Ramirez Mahrez Albrighton Big Slim That would be some team.
AmarteyAndChill Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 9 minutes ago, cityfanlee23 said: 4-2-3-1 . Schmeichel Tripper Nastasic Evans Chilwell Ndidi Drink Ramirez Mahrez Albrighton Big Slim We could have got Evans and Trippier in the summer. Not a chance now.
cityfanlee23 Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 9 minutes ago, Fox92 said: I like your Desperation for some scrap of hope. 8 minutes ago, Goober said: the fvck you get them from? Tottenham and west brom mate, you'd probably recognise them if you saw them......
cityfanlee23 Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 8 minutes ago, CityFan 06 said: That would be some team. The boat has sailed now, should have started getting these deals done in december if were to have a hope, I'm desperate for us to atleast get 1 CB and Ramirez though
Finnegan Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 I don't understand anyone that thinks Robert ****ing Snodgrass is better than Ramirez.
AKCJ Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 5 minutes ago, Finnegan said: I don't understand anyone that thinks Robert ****ing Snodgrass is better than Ramirez. Snodgrass - 7 goals and 3 assists in 1712 PL minutes (goal or assist every 1.9 games) Ramirez - 2 goals and 3 assists in 1196 minutes (goal or assist every 2.6 games)
The whole world smiles Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 34 minutes ago, AKCJ said: Snodgrass - 7 goals and 3 assists in 1712 PL minutes (goal or assist every 1.9 games) Ramirez - 2 goals and 3 assists in 1196 minutes (goal or assist every 2.6 games) not really a fair comparison, Snodgrass takes penalties.
TJB-fox Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 Just now, The whole world smiles said: not really a fair comparison, Snodgrass takes penalties. Penalties don't count
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 25 January 2017 Posted 25 January 2017 7 minutes ago, TJB-fox said: Penalties don't count Spot on.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.