Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
SheppyFox

Kelechi Iheanacho

Recommended Posts

Posted
38 minutes ago, Moksky said:

This is more paper talk at this stage, no bid as yet 

Are you aware of any bids at all Moksky?

Posted

Why are we never ready to go as soon as the season ends?

Posted
3 minutes ago, AmarteyAndChill said:

Rooneys past it. Not even premier league standard now. 

I don't understand why Rooney has become bad he was a england legend for so many years its a shame because it shows how footballers can become so bad when once they were great  

Posted
23 hours ago, lcfceaves said:

I'd rather have Rooney with Vardy... 

giphy.gif

Posted

Man City want to retain a buy back clause - according to reports . Suggested as £30 million ! 

Is this a thing now ? the buying club pays out £24 mill on a relatively untried player who could turn out to be rubbish and ultimately valueless but if he's good the seller just exercises the option to buy him back . 

Posted
14 hours ago, DatfoxesKid23 said:

I don't understand why Rooney has become bad he was a england legend for so many years its a shame because it shows how footballers can become so bad when once they were great  

Because he's been playing at such a high level for ages probably. Also all the takeaways. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, surrifox said:

Man City want to retain a buy back clause - according to reports . Suggested as £30 million ! 

Is this a thing now ? the buying club pays out £24 mill on a relatively untried player who could turn out to be rubbish and ultimately valueless but if he's good the seller just exercises the option to buy him back . 

 

 

Rudkin will be all over that then!

Posted
49 minutes ago, surrifox said:

Man City want to retain a buy back clause - according to reports . Suggested as £30 million ! 

Is this a thing now ? the buying club pays out £24 mill on a relatively untried player who could turn out to be rubbish and ultimately valueless but if he's good the seller just exercises the option to buy him back . 

basically better than a loan deal then. If hes rubbish no loss. if hes good get him back.

 

This shouldn't be aloud to be honest as its only big clubs who will EVER benefit from it.

Posted
12 minutes ago, les-tah said:

basically better than a loan deal then. If hes rubbish no loss. if hes good get him back.

 

This shouldn't be aloud to be honest as its only big clubs who will EVER benefit from it.

It certainly screws the smaller clubs over, especially if the player becomes the main star of the club then you have to lose him

Posted
Just now, Soundman said:

It certainly screws the smaller clubs over, especially if the player becomes the main star of the club then you have to lose him

It just takes one club - and that club is bound to be west ham - to agree to something like this and then it'll become standard. Another nail in modern football.

Posted

This is what happened with Real selling Morata to Juve, so they could just buy him back for 30 mil when they sold him for 20 mil.

Posted
4 minutes ago, toddybad said:

It just takes one club - and that club is bound to be west ham - to agree to something like this and then it'll become standard. Another nail in modern football.

Also there is probably nothing West ham can do. There are not a lot of strikers available as good as Iheanacho for 25 million

Posted
21 hours ago, surrifox said:

Man City want to retain a buy back clause - according to reports . Suggested as £30 million ! 

Is this a thing now ? the buying club pays out £24 mill on a relatively untried player who could turn out to be rubbish and ultimately valueless but if he's good the seller just exercises the option to buy him back . 

Very big in Spain. Off the top of my head, Real Madrid have done it over recent years with Marco Asencio, Alvaro Morata, Lucas Vasquez, Pedro Leon, Dani Carvajal.

 

Clever move, you get a transfer fee if they flop, and a developed player back at a lesser cost if they're good.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Lovejoy said:

Very big in Spain. Off the top of my head, Real Madrid have done it over recent years with Marco Asencio, Alvaro Morata, Lucas Vasquez, Pedro Leon, Dani Carvajal.

 

Clever move, you get a transfer fee if they flop, and a developed player back at a lesser cost if they're good.

might be wrong but didn't Barca want this sort of deal when Gerard Deulofeu went to Everton?

Posted
14 hours ago, Aus Fox said:

Rudkin to buy him for 35mil with a 30 mil buy back clause.

your forgetting his million pound per goal bonus, that's the ace up his sleeve

Posted
5 hours ago, Lovejoy said:

Very big in Spain. Off the top of my head, Real Madrid have done it over recent years with Marco Asencio, Alvaro Morata, Lucas Vasquez, Pedro Leon, Dani Carvajal.

 

Clever move, you get a transfer fee if they flop, and a developed player back at a lesser cost if they're good.

Clever move but then so is buying players ownership rights in South America. Both seem unethical though. The big sides will just become like Chelsea snap up every young player in sight and then do this kind of deal. It's a bit like release clauses IF it was true that Gray had 12m clause then we take all the risk playing a player when he's finding his feet/breaking through then as soon as he's ready a bigger side buys him ready made to hit the ground running. So much wrong with modern football then again makes us winning the league all the more impressive. rant over.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...