Nick Posted 29 May 2017 Posted 29 May 2017 38 minutes ago, Moksky said: This is more paper talk at this stage, no bid as yet Are you aware of any bids at all Moksky?
Moksky Posted 29 May 2017 Posted 29 May 2017 1 hour ago, Swan Lesta said: Are you aware of any bids at all Moksky? No actual bids that I know of.
DatfoxesKid23 Posted 29 May 2017 Posted 29 May 2017 west ham bided 24m for iheanacho http://www.soccernet.com.ng/2017/05/leicester-city-worried-as-west-ham-bids.
FoxinNotts Posted 29 May 2017 Posted 29 May 2017 34 minutes ago, DatfoxesKid23 said: west ham bided 24m for iheanacho http://www.soccernet.com.ng/2017/05/leicester-city-worried-as-west-ham-bids. What!!! No way
Mease Posted 29 May 2017 Posted 29 May 2017 9 hours ago, mozartfox said: More chance of signing Mickey Rooney. Mickey Mouse
Bluearmyfox28 Posted 29 May 2017 Posted 29 May 2017 19 hours ago, lcfceaves said: I'd rather have Rooney with Vardy... If Rooney goes to another Prem club, he'll return to Everton.
DatfoxesKid23 Posted 29 May 2017 Posted 29 May 2017 8 hours ago, FoxinNotts said: What!!! No way I'm as shocked as you are west ham showing more financial strength than a team that went to the champions league
AmarteyAndChill Posted 29 May 2017 Posted 29 May 2017 4 hours ago, Bluearmyfox28 said: If Rooney goes to another Prem club, he'll return to Everton. Rooneys past it. Not even premier league standard now.
DatfoxesKid23 Posted 29 May 2017 Posted 29 May 2017 3 minutes ago, AmarteyAndChill said: Rooneys past it. Not even premier league standard now. I don't understand why Rooney has become bad he was a england legend for so many years its a shame because it shows how footballers can become so bad when once they were great
Tuna Posted 29 May 2017 Posted 29 May 2017 23 hours ago, lcfceaves said: I'd rather have Rooney with Vardy...
surrifox Posted 30 May 2017 Posted 30 May 2017 Man City want to retain a buy back clause - according to reports . Suggested as £30 million ! Is this a thing now ? the buying club pays out £24 mill on a relatively untried player who could turn out to be rubbish and ultimately valueless but if he's good the seller just exercises the option to buy him back .
lgfualol Posted 30 May 2017 Posted 30 May 2017 14 hours ago, DatfoxesKid23 said: I don't understand why Rooney has become bad he was a england legend for so many years its a shame because it shows how footballers can become so bad when once they were great Because he's been playing at such a high level for ages probably. Also all the takeaways.
MPH Posted 30 May 2017 Posted 30 May 2017 10 minutes ago, surrifox said: Man City want to retain a buy back clause - according to reports . Suggested as £30 million ! Is this a thing now ? the buying club pays out £24 mill on a relatively untried player who could turn out to be rubbish and ultimately valueless but if he's good the seller just exercises the option to buy him back . Rudkin will be all over that then!
AyewJoking Posted 30 May 2017 Posted 30 May 2017 we're probably not interested in this guy anyway but this thread is depressing me
les-tah Posted 30 May 2017 Posted 30 May 2017 49 minutes ago, surrifox said: Man City want to retain a buy back clause - according to reports . Suggested as £30 million ! Is this a thing now ? the buying club pays out £24 mill on a relatively untried player who could turn out to be rubbish and ultimately valueless but if he's good the seller just exercises the option to buy him back . basically better than a loan deal then. If hes rubbish no loss. if hes good get him back. This shouldn't be aloud to be honest as its only big clubs who will EVER benefit from it.
Guest Posted 30 May 2017 Posted 30 May 2017 12 minutes ago, les-tah said: basically better than a loan deal then. If hes rubbish no loss. if hes good get him back. This shouldn't be aloud to be honest as its only big clubs who will EVER benefit from it. It certainly screws the smaller clubs over, especially if the player becomes the main star of the club then you have to lose him
Guest Posted 30 May 2017 Posted 30 May 2017 Just now, Soundman said: It certainly screws the smaller clubs over, especially if the player becomes the main star of the club then you have to lose him It just takes one club - and that club is bound to be west ham - to agree to something like this and then it'll become standard. Another nail in modern football.
Dylster Posted 30 May 2017 Posted 30 May 2017 This is what happened with Real selling Morata to Juve, so they could just buy him back for 30 mil when they sold him for 20 mil.
Guest Posted 30 May 2017 Posted 30 May 2017 4 minutes ago, toddybad said: It just takes one club - and that club is bound to be west ham - to agree to something like this and then it'll become standard. Another nail in modern football. Also there is probably nothing West ham can do. There are not a lot of strikers available as good as Iheanacho for 25 million
Aus Fox Posted 30 May 2017 Posted 30 May 2017 Rudkin to buy him for 35mil with a 30 mil buy back clause.
Lovejoy Posted 31 May 2017 Posted 31 May 2017 21 hours ago, surrifox said: Man City want to retain a buy back clause - according to reports . Suggested as £30 million ! Is this a thing now ? the buying club pays out £24 mill on a relatively untried player who could turn out to be rubbish and ultimately valueless but if he's good the seller just exercises the option to buy him back . Very big in Spain. Off the top of my head, Real Madrid have done it over recent years with Marco Asencio, Alvaro Morata, Lucas Vasquez, Pedro Leon, Dani Carvajal. Clever move, you get a transfer fee if they flop, and a developed player back at a lesser cost if they're good.
Jimbo Posted 31 May 2017 Posted 31 May 2017 46 minutes ago, Lovejoy said: Very big in Spain. Off the top of my head, Real Madrid have done it over recent years with Marco Asencio, Alvaro Morata, Lucas Vasquez, Pedro Leon, Dani Carvajal. Clever move, you get a transfer fee if they flop, and a developed player back at a lesser cost if they're good. might be wrong but didn't Barca want this sort of deal when Gerard Deulofeu went to Everton?
whoareyaaa Posted 31 May 2017 Posted 31 May 2017 14 hours ago, Aus Fox said: Rudkin to buy him for 35mil with a 30 mil buy back clause. your forgetting his million pound per goal bonus, that's the ace up his sleeve
desertfox2 Posted 31 May 2017 Posted 31 May 2017 5 hours ago, Lovejoy said: Very big in Spain. Off the top of my head, Real Madrid have done it over recent years with Marco Asencio, Alvaro Morata, Lucas Vasquez, Pedro Leon, Dani Carvajal. Clever move, you get a transfer fee if they flop, and a developed player back at a lesser cost if they're good. Clever move but then so is buying players ownership rights in South America. Both seem unethical though. The big sides will just become like Chelsea snap up every young player in sight and then do this kind of deal. It's a bit like release clauses IF it was true that Gray had 12m clause then we take all the risk playing a player when he's finding his feet/breaking through then as soon as he's ready a bigger side buys him ready made to hit the ground running. So much wrong with modern football then again makes us winning the league all the more impressive. rant over.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.