Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Blue ROI said:

We should stand our ground on a fee of 75 million at least.

 

Gareth Bale was sold for 100 million having helped Spurs finished no greater than 4th place and not even a Champions League quarter final.

 

Man City bought John Stones for 50million FFS. Would they accept a bid of 60 million for Kevin De Bruyne? Would they f''''.

Well they bought De Bruyne for £55 million fairly recently so maybe paying £75 million for a clearly inferior player

is even making them think twice.

Posted
19 minutes ago, RODNEY FERNIO said:

 Well they bought De Bruyne for £55 million fairly recently so maybe paying £75 million for a clearly inferior player

is even making them think twice.

 

What people are failing to grasp is they bought De Bruyne three seasons a go when he had just turned 24.   He's 26 now and has held his value and some.

 

Mahrez is 28 in February, in three seasons time he'll be going on 31 and will have to be posting Messi/Ronaldo stats to hold his value.

 

In all honesty it's a great time for us to sell Mahrez with his age and two years on his contract left. The fact that he'll throw an absolute wobbly if he's still here after the window shuts just makes it a must for us to get it done.

  • Like 3
Posted
13 hours ago, lcfc sheff said:

some people must have made a killing, he was 14/1 on deadline day to stay!

Maximum stake is usually low but Mahrez to stay at Leicester is a steady earner.

 

I'll be damned if i'm giving up on it now. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

If we want to play hardball over this then Mahrez is in no position to call our bluff.

 

He'll be getting a wage rise and his move to Manchester City. He's not going to put that in jeopardy.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Tuna said:

Bit of an overreaction.

Not really after all his whinging and whining about us blocking his move! Now he’s the one doing it because he wants a slice of the pie lol 

 

 

Posted

I actually don't begrudge Mahrez his 10% or whatever it is, he has certainly earned it here.

 

What will make me laugh though is his "super agent" Kia Joorabchian not getting his slice of it if Leicester play hardball. Mahrez will no doubt be happy with his new salary and if both the clubs agree terms then Mahrez's agent has got nowhere to go when negotiating with Leicester if we insist he doesn't get it. :D

 

Mahrez and his agent will have no option but to suck it up.

Posted
1 minute ago, Gerard said:

I actually don't begrudge Mahrez his 10% or whatever it is, he has certainly earned it here.

 

What will make me laugh though is his "super agent" Kia Joorabchian not getting his slice of it if Leicester play hardball. Mahrez will no doubt be happy with his new salary and if both the clubs agree terms then Mahrez's agent has got nowhere to go when negotiating with Leicester if we insist he doesn't get it. :D

 

Mahrez and his agent will have no option but to suck it up.

in that case lets have some money back from the shit buys 

swings and round abouts

Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, chapero82 said:

Not really after all his whinging and whining about us blocking his move! Now he’s the one doing it because he wants a slice of the pie lol 

 

 

You know the club isn't green-lighting the deal because they don't want to pay him the money that HE deserves according to the law, right? You talking about the "slice of the pie" like it's a hand-out or something. Every player gets a part of the transfer fee, then why shouldn't he?

Edited by the fox
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, the fox said:

You know the club isn't green-lighting the deal because they don't want to pay him the money that HE deserves according to the law, right? You talking about the "slice of the pie" like it's a hand-out or something. Every player gets a part of the transfer fee, then why shouldn't he?

 

Why should he get a loyalty bonus when he went on strike? Ruined our second half of the season? Surely by law he should have not gone on strike! 

  • Like 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, the fox said:

You know the club isn't green-lighting the deal because they don't want to pay him the money that HE deserves according to the law, right? You talking about the "slice of the pie" like it's a hand-out or something. Every player gets a part of the transfer fee, then why shouldn't he?

 

Its not because of the law, it's because of what's in the pfa approved contracts used in the pro game. It'd be interesting to see what happened if we tested this clause in the law courts but, alas, the pfa appeals process is the route to argue over clauses and we'd lose. Hence the fact we might sit tight until he agrees to reduce his share.

Posted

Surely he can't have that right to a loyalty bonus because he's withdrawn his transfer request lol if he does then this sport is genuinely one big joke.

  • Like 3
Posted

Presumably if the terms of his contract have been met for him to get a “loyalty” payment, then he is entitled to hold out for it. Just as Leicester are at liberty to refuse to allow the transfer to proceed unless he waives his right to the fee, or MC pay it instead.

 

If he really wants to go that much, then he’d have no problem waiving it. Really hope the club succeed with this. I’d hate him to get it after all the trouble he’s caused recently.

  • Like 2
Posted

so il looks like mr ryad is controlling his own fate ( master on the pitch , master on the deal

 

he can throw away the loyalty fee and he is gone 

he can hold on the fee and he is delaying his hi

plz don't play with the hearths , ryad , be a man and leave the loyalty fee within the house , we do need it to strengthen the squad 

( on the basis the Alex Nixon is telling the truth ) 

  • Like 1
Posted

What a melon. Thought he just wanted to be at a Big Club?  The boy and his agent are a joke. Loyalty bonus”s are based on loyalty. 

 

Sack it it off Big Man Mahrez and live the benchwarmers dream.

  • Like 1
Posted

Unbelievable Jeff!!

 

Do we really need the money from his sale? Could we just not threaten to pull the plug?

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, RODNEY FERNIO said:

Well they bought De Bruyne for £55 million fairly recently so maybe paying £75 million for a clearly inferior player

is even making them think twice.

Pretty irrelevant what they paid for KDB, what matters is the value now.  It might have been a fairly recent transfer but I think you'd need £150m to try to buy him.  Similar situation with Salah.  I mean try offering Liverpool their £35m back for him.  He must be worth over £100m now.  Is Harry Maguire only worth £17m because that is what we paid for him only a year ago? 

 

Riyad is worth £75m as a minimum IMO.

 

Edited by murphy
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...