Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Should Claude Puel be sacked?  

611 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Claude Puel be sacked or backed?

    • Sack him NOW.
    • Keep him and back him in the transfer window.


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Tuna said:

If you cannot communicate adequately with your staff then you have problems. Bloke still uses a translator for interviews.

 

Players look confused and we know there have been reports of players not understanding him.

 

Maybe harsh on Claude but that's our problem, and it isn't going to get better. He'll manage again in France and most likely do well. But he cannot change the language issues, nor his dour and uninspiring personality.

 

He has to go. Not for us now or in the future. 

 

 

 

I'm not saying learning a new language is easy, but he's been in England for 2 seasons now and still uses a translator?

Edited by Leicester_Loyal
Posted

I so wanted him to stay... to make it work... to turn it around. 

 

Last weeks game was a game changer. For a whole week i was pissed at the result and how we played, however after reading the player apologies and the subsequent letter from the chairman backing him, i still had some hope. 

 

But today's game was boring and effortless and sadly i've succumb to the masses and think its best for us and Puel that he goes. 

 

Im all for giving chances but with no signs of improvement and only deterioration there is no other option. 

  • Like 3
Posted
32 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

I’m on the fence.

 

if the owners are going to keep him then they have to back him in the transfer market because this team clearly isn’t fit for his brand of football.

 

But if they sack him then they need to have an idea of who they want and they need to get the right man in.

 

Sacking for the sake of sacking is the reason why we have done **** all for over a year now.

 

We’ve sacked managers because we were playing hopelessly, no other reason.

 

The problem is they have no idea what to look for in a manager and so have now hired 2 in a row who I said from very early on would never work here.

 

As for backing this tool in the transfer market, they’d have to be insane. This ‘brand’ of football is hateful.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

 

I'm not saying learning a new language is easy, but he's been in England for 2 seasons now and still uses a translator?

 

Its a Leicester ting

Posted

I couldn't quite hear him on the radio, despite speakers at 100%, but did he just say we played "with intensiteeeee" and that there wasn't anything "fundamentally wrong with the performaaaance?"

 

Blokes off his rocker.

Posted
8 minutes ago, LestaAl said:

Anybody bothered about his comments on RL....

he is just mumbling rubbish.....

Out now!

To be fair Stringer is asking the questions lol

Posted
Just now, Legend_in_blue said:

I couldn't quite hear him on the radio, despite speakers at 100%, but did he just say we played "with intensiteeeee" and that there wasn't anything "fundamentally wrong with the performaaaance?"

 

Blokes off his rocker.

Does he realise we were the ones playing in blue? maybe he is colour blind

Guest Mee-9
Posted

The lack of charisma in that interview.

 

Jesus.

Posted

He's got to go. I'm not one who demands instant success but we are on a downward trajectory under this bloke and for all I like some of his ideas, there's no way he'll implement them without the fans on board and without the players too.

 

Puel out.

Posted

Now want him out based on today. Talks of experimenting then decides to persist with Morgan, ignore our U23 defenders who have been good this season, keep Mahrez in the team despite being god awful and wants to leave in the summer, brings off our 2 youngsters who were putting in effort when others wern't and replaces them with players that we already know about instead of giving Barnes and Thomas 30 minutes to see if they can play a part for next season.

The only positive I can take from his stint in charge is that Choudhury has been steady when given chances and could be a solid backup next season, if he used the games remaining to test out other youth prospects then im sure some would be more forgiving as it would be visible he is trying new things. As it stands he is using players he already realises don't work in his tactic and isn't changing to acompany them which is fair enough if he had just came in 5 games ago but after this length of time he should know which areas need replacing in his system and should be trying other options to see if anyone else can do the job that he wants them to do.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Miquel The Work Geordie said:

Love how everyone that's been bashing the 'out' drum for weeks can't seem to get it into their heads that it is possible to change your mind after a dismal run of form.

 

DO U OWE ME A APOLOGY?!?! I WA SAYING THIS AS SOON AS HE COME IN


No one owes anybody a bloody apology, get over yourselves for crying out loud. Sorry some of us had patience.

It’s got nothing to do with patience, you just lacked the common sense and insight to see that the way Puel (and Shakespeare) wanted us to play football was always going to end in disaster.

 

Disagreement is one thing, but after some of the arrogant, disrespectful comments that have been seen on here in the past 6 months to people who doubted Puel, you deserve to look a fool.

 

I think some of you care more about looking positive to other people than the future of the club.

 

When he is sacked I’d love to see the look on some people’s faces. 

  • Like 2
Posted

If I could see just the slightest glimmer of hope I'd be prepared to give him a transfer window and at least another half a season but I don't see a single player that has improved under his leadership and we have lost all the positive attributes of our play. Time to go and the sooner the better.

Posted (edited)

I defended Puel until the Palace debacle last week.

 

Today just further illustrated why he must go. The least I expected was a positive response from the 5-0 embarrassment, and I was proved right.

Edited by iamafox
Posted

Go but only if he takes some of the old boys with him.

 

Need a completely refreshing approach. Puel seems to have lost the plot like 3 of the last managers. Something stinks.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Kitchandro said:

It’s got nothing to do with patience, you just lacked the common sense and insight to see that the way Puel (and Shakespeare) wanted us to play football was always going to end in disaster.

 

Disagreement is one thing, but after some of the arrogant, disrespectful comments that have been seen on here in the past 6 months to people who doubted Puel, you deserve to look a fool.

 

I think some of you care more about looking positive to other people than the future of the club.

 

When he is sacked I’d love to see the look on some people’s faces. 

 

I've been neither here nor there - what's the view like from that high horse of yours?

Posted
8 minutes ago, Kitchandro said:

It’s got nothing to do with patience, you just lacked the common sense and insight to see that the way Puel (and Shakespeare) wanted us to play football was always going to end in disaster.

 

Disagreement is one thing, but after some of the arrogant, disrespectful comments that have been seen on here in the past 6 months to people who doubted Puel, you deserve to look a fool.

 

I think some of you care more about looking positive to other people than the future of the club.

 

When he is sacked I’d love to see the look on some people’s faces. 

I kind of wouldnt mind seeing him go now

 

But if they do sack him i'm still going to point the finger at those that wanted rid all along and say "if only we'd given him a transfer window he'd probably have bossed it"

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Legend_in_blue said:

I couldn't quite hear him on the radio, despite speakers at 100%, but did he just say we played "with intensiteeeee" and that there wasn't anything "fundamentally wrong with the performaaaance?"

 

Blokes off his rocker.

No, he didn’t say anything of the sort.

Posted

I would vote sack him, especially after the recent performances but who does the club replace him with?

 

It needs to be someone who the club is prepared to back and has the strength of character to make the changes in player personnel necessary to get the club back on an upward curve rather than relegation mire we are heading for in 2019!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...