Fightforever Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 1 minute ago, Meat and 2 veg said: They’ll end up spending £55m on Lewis dunk I can actually see this happening on the last hour of the transfer window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LC/FC Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 2 minutes ago, waylander said: Me to one of the most intelligent posters on here . Miss his comments. But obviously missed what went off too . Back to topic tell them to do one hm is staying. ??? I too thought he was insightful and well written too at the time. Now I question his Alan Sheehan obsession 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RowlattsFox Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 We'll probably accept 80m depending on how it is structured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat and 2 veg Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 1 minute ago, Fightforever said: I can actually see this happening on the last hour of the transfer window. Fits the budget and ole Gunnar Shakespeare’s weird obsession with British players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finnegan Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 4 minutes ago, waylander said: one of the most intelligent posters on here Alright Tony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat and 2 veg Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 Just now, RowlattsFox said: We'll probably accept 80m depending on how it is structured. We want a record fee for a defender don’t we? So I can’t imagine it would be any less than £75m upfront with add ons at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LC/FC Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 1 minute ago, Meat and 2 veg said: We want a record fee for a defender don’t we? So I can’t imagine it would be any less than £75m upfront with add ons at least Only way I'd personally accept this now, after all this time faffing about would be no addons, deals or clauses. Straight up 80 million lump to the bank. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozartfox Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 Given Top‘s Chinese roots, this may not be a clever tactic by Woody. If Top and the Club really are looking for 90m, you would think nothing will happen now. Of course this 90m figure may be bollocks? 80m - all up front - is tempting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat and 2 veg Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 1 minute ago, LC/FC said: Only way I'd personally accept this now, after all this time faffing about would be no addons, deals or clauses. Straight up 80 million lump to the bank. Same here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Markyblue Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 If the total we want is met sell, if they are a penny short tell them to go forth and multiply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LC/FC Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 Just now, Markyblue said: If the total we want is met sell, if they are a penny short tell them to go forth and multiply. With themselves. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacnah Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 4 minutes ago, mozartfox said: Given Top‘s Chinese roots, this may not be a clever tactic by Woody. If Top and the Club really are looking for 90m, you would think nothing will happen now. Of course this 90m figure may be bollocks? 80m - all up front - is tempting have i missed something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozartfox Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 12 minutes ago, Meat and 2 veg said: They’ll end up spending £55m on Lewis dunk Rather them than us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LC/FC Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 1 minute ago, Jacnah said: have i missed something He's Thai Chinese. So his ethics origins are Chinese and not indigenous Thai. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonnieTodger Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 10 years ago everyone loved Transfer Deadline Day, but genuine ITKs on social media has made Sky Sports News a secondary source and they hate it. Before you could follow John Percy, you'd rely on SSN but they've become a joke. They have about 3 daily dedicated half-hour shows to talk shit about transfer rumours that they've made up. The way that Kaveh Solhekol and Darmesh wank over potential fees and record deals is absolutely pathetic. If Harry Maguire farts, they'll report on it and how it could lead to him moving to United. They pretend to know what's going on and drag out every saga. £80M for Harry Maguire is ridiculous money and whilst we should take it (unless they offer £90M), I almost hope he stays to rub it in their faces. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wymsey Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 If he goes for the obscene amount quoted, can trust LCFC to spend it wisely - as believe the club has learnt how to be more savvy in the transfer market after their mistakes over Silva, Slimani, Musa and now very possibly Iheanacho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban.spaceman Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozartfox Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 2 minutes ago, LC/FC said: He's Thai Chinese. So his ethics origins are Chinese and not indigenous Thai. Thanks My friend. Working in Malaysia (as I do) -35% of the population are Chinese-Malay. Much the same all over SE including Thailand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
floz Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 2 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: Well in that case Manu are negotiating like the UK Government. They think they hold all the cards but in fact hold none. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LC/FC Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 3 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: God, don't want to drag politics into this... But if this is all gonna go brexit, then he'll have a shock about things being overpriced, very soon... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LC/FC Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 1 minute ago, mozartfox said: Thanks My friend. Working in Malaysia (as I do) -35% of the population are Chinese-Malay. Much the same all over SE including Thailand. Yeah, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Cambodia, Vietnam and Singapore have generations of Chinese immigrants that have settled over the centuries. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crispin LA Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 Getting so bored with the whole thing, I hope we except 80m and he goes. It's really dragging on for to long, and won't benefit us if he stays here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waylander Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 Someone should ask trump and Boris what they think ?. As the global giant are being refused a chance to grow in this global market . Clearly we are restricting Manchester United’s brand . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkerleeds Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 1 hour ago, ClaphamFox said: The company that owns Sky Bet may have clearly taken the decision to pay the Sky Sports presenters to front their ad because they know people will associate them with the Sky name, but that does not mean that the two companies have any affiliation beyond Sky's 2.6% stake in The Stars Group. The vast majority of the Stars Group's revenues come from its ownership of various online poker sites, including Poker Stars and Full Tilt Poker. Its revenue stream from sports betting is tiny in comparison. Any transfer story broadcast on Sky Sports is not going to move the needle at all on The Stars Group's share price - it will have literally zero impact. So the idea that Sky Sports runs stories in an attempt to move the share price of a company it owns a tiny stake in and whose revenues from sports betting are very small anyway is frankly ludicrous. Yes, I know. My point was a broader point about Sky Sports, Sky Bet and The Stars Group as a whole. Others may have been discussing the merits of them championing the story to get people to use Sky Bet, but that wasn't what I was getting at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suzie the Fox Posted 1 August 2019 Share Posted 1 August 2019 Sky sports and social media can sod off tbh, bring back Ceefax and Teletext. Thats where all the true deals were at. (Not saying i remember them as im far to young ) 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts