Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

F*** goal line tech, it's not football anymore etc.

God it's nice to have it back.

Guest Lcfc82
Posted
Just now, StanSP said:

People blaming VAR. That's not a VAR fault. People sure do love to moan and scapegoat don't they. 

 

That's goalline tech which is separate to VAR. 

 

20200617_185032.thumb.jpg.6a570bd4bbdd686129523811b1047e3a.jpg

The goal line tech clearly has not worked though. So surely VAR should get involved in it.

Posted
1 minute ago, StanSP said:

People blaming VAR. That's not a VAR fault. People sure do love to moan and scapegoat don't they. 

 

That's goalline tech which is separate to VAR. 

 

20200617_185032.thumb.jpg.6a570bd4bbdd686129523811b1047e3a.jpg

Yeah we all know VAR is ****ing terrible anyway without this new issue.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, The Bear said:

Except the ball went between the posts to go behind it. It's literally impossible not to. 

But when the ball finally goes behind the line, half of it is also in line with the post. I'm just theorising, a possible flaw. 

Edited by wardyfox86
Guest Electric Yetis
Posted

Villa to let the Sheff Utd 'Keeper walk it in from the restart? 😂

Posted

I'm sorry but the first thing they're talking about is a gesture. That's not right. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Lcfc82 said:

The goal line tech clearly has not worked though. So surely VAR should get involved in it.

VAR can review goals but can they review non-goals? 

Posted (edited)

as long as he's applying pressure to the ball against the post then maybe it's not fully behind the line, if the line is the same thickens as the post. 

 

We're talking millimetres but actually might be the right decision.  

Edited by Collymore
Guest Lcfc82
Posted
1 minute ago, brucey said:

VAR can review goals but can they review non-goals? 

Clear and obvious error though

Posted

So the 3 VAR refs are happy to just watch that obvious goal not be given and we've got people here saying that is fine? 

 

What are they there for if not to prevent clear and obvious errors? 

 

People were posting that image on this forum while the referee was still pissing around with his watch. 

Posted (edited)
Just now, Collymore said:

as long as he's applying pressure to the ball against the post then maybe it's not fully behind the line, if the line is the dame thickens as the post. 

 

We're talking millimetres but actually might be the right decision.  

It goes about half a foot beyond the post then he pushes it against the post 

Edited by foxes_rule1978
Posted (edited)

So VAR could’ve overruled it! Also no one seems to have mentioned the goalkeeping so bad. 

Edited by Unabomber
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...