Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, AKCJ said:

We've had 4/5 years of goal line tech working perfectly. Why would Oliver doubt it?

Plus I don't think we should be letting refs pander to the self-involved dickheads on the pitch. 

Posted

0-0 wouldn’t be so bad means sheff Utd don’t really close the gap and villa stay bottom 3 and hopefully lose every game for the rest of the season 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

We've had 4/5 years of goal line tech working perfectly. Why would Oliver doubt it?

Because it's a restart and maybe they forgot?

 

I just don't know why they don't just check things more often. Everyone looks at that and agrees it's a goal so why can't the ref?

 

Appeals system, 3 per team per game. Easy.

Edited by Nod.E
Posted
Just now, The Bear said:

Plus I don't think we should be letting refs pander to the self-involved dickheads on the pitch. 

The issue with checking with VAR is would they then have to check it every time a team thinks it’s over the line and the technology has rule correctly that it hasn’t. Imagine how much more time would be wasted.

Posted
Just now, RowlattsFox said:

Let's be honest, this game was always going to be shit, fans or not. Not the game Sky would have liked to chose to get things going again. 

Couldn’t of picked a worse advertisement for the premier league 😂

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, RowlattsFox said:

Let's be honest, this game was always going to be shit, fans or not. Not the game Sky would have liked to chose to get things going again. 

Hopefully Man City v Arsenal next is much better (it can’t be any worse)

Posted

Unless something happens in the last 10 the disallowed goal will be the sole highlight.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, davieG said:

The issue with checking with VAR is would they then have to check it every time a team thinks it’s over the line and the technology has rule correctly that it hasn’t. Imagine how much more time would be wasted.

Limit it to 2 or 3 appeals per team per game then.

Edited by Nod.E
Posted
11 minutes ago, lestajigs said:

anyone else wondering, how the hell Sheffield utd are 6th

It's been a while, they probably forgot what they are supposed to do with that funny round object!

Posted
Just now, The Bear said:

Hawk eye have said that the way Nyland fell in the net meant it was unable to achieve a suitable imagine to prove the ball went in.

hahaha have they actually?

 

What a load of bollocks.

Posted
Just now, Nod.E said:

Limit it to a 2 or 3 appeals per team per game then.

Goal line appeals or in total?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Nod.E said:

Because it's a restart and maybe they forgot?

 

I just don't know why they don't just check things more often. Everyone looks at that and agrees it's a goal so why can't the ref?

If we can all see that that was a goal sitting here at home them it’s pretty inexcusable that it wasn’t picked up by VAR. You don’t even need to review just seeing the tv replay showed it was a goal. If that happened to us and cost us top 4 it would be mental. 

Posted

How does goalline tech work? Does the ref's wristband vibrate, or make a noise to indicate a goal? If so, that is stupid, because you wouldn't know if it wasn't working. Surely some sort if green light for goal, and red light for no goal system would be better, because then they'd at least know that if there was no light at all that it isn't working.

Posted
1 minute ago, The Bear said:

Hawk eye have said that the way Nyland fell in the net meant it was unable to achieve a suitable imagine to prove the ball went in.

What a load of rubbish!

Posted
1 minute ago, The Bear said:

Hawk eye have said that the way Nyland fell in the net meant it was unable to achieve a suitable imagine to prove the ball went in.

 

Seen a few in this thread already.

Posted
1 minute ago, The Bear said:

Hawk eye have said that the way Nyland fell in the net meant it was unable to achieve a suitable imagine to prove the ball went in.

Lmao surely not? Haha

Guest foxestalkisfullofidiots
Posted
21 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

Jamie Redknapp referring to Henderson (23) as the best young keeper in the world. No doubt he's brilliant, but Donnaruma (21) is better by far. 

I'd have him as England's number 1, better than Pickford

Posted
Just now, SouthStandUpperTier said:

How does goalline tech work? Does the ref's wristband vibrate, or make a noise to indicate a goal? If so, that is stupid, because you wouldn't know if it wasn't working. Surely some sort if green light for goal, and red light for no goal system would be better, because then they'd at least know that if there was no light at all that it isn't working.

It vibrates and the display on it says GOAL. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...