Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
35 minutes ago, Leicesterpool said:

Apprently Chris Hughton set to takeover from Flores at Watford.

I'd say thats a good appointment if true

Posted

Don’t mess about do they. Seems like no matter who they have in it will make much difference this season. Might as well put deeney in charge until the end of the season 

Posted
2 minutes ago, ithuriel said:

Wonder how many managers they will go through this season.

Quique Flores would be best advised not to move far. He'll be back in charge by March.

Posted (edited)

Ridiculous that they've given Flores 3 months and no transfer window to sort it out. 

 

I know they won't, but the next appointment needs to have the potential relegation in mind and look to promotion. But Watford don't think long term.

Edited by Facecloth
  • Like 2
Posted

does ranieri have a job? for some reason i think he would fit perfectly with what the watford owners want, and be an absolute disaster in reality. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, ScouseFox said:

does ranieri have a job? for some reason i think he would fit perfectly with what the watford owners want, and be an absolute disaster in reality. 

 

I think he's at Sampdoria. Plus, his brief time at Fulham might put them off.

Edited by Guesty
Posted
3 minutes ago, Stadt said:

Hughton is well overrated because he’s a nice bloke 

I thought he did a pretty decent job at Newcastle, Birmingham and Brighton if my memory serve me correct :dunno:

Posted
2 minutes ago, Izzy said:

I thought he did a pretty decent job at Newcastle, Birmingham and Brighton if my memory serve me correct :dunno:

He's a good manager but I don't think this is a good fit at all, there's no real difference between him and Flores tbh

 

33 minutes ago, Facecloth said:

Ridiculous that they've given Flores 3 months and no transfer window to sort it out. 

 

I know they won't, but the next appointment needs to have the potential relegation in mind and look to promotion. But Watford don't think long term.

Maybe, but I think that's a bit too defeatist, the is probably the best season to be in a rele scrap because a few wins you're about 8th. No point conceding defeat yet when they can easily put a run together. If I were them i'd get a rele specialist in, or an actual attacking manager. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Izzy said:

I thought he did a pretty decent job at Newcastle, Birmingham and Brighton if my memory serve me correct :dunno:

Spent a lot of money at Brighton to just keep their head’s above water every season. They could barely score too. He’s fine for getting a club promoted and will keep them up but that’s his ceiling.

Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, kingfox said:

They might as well give it to Elton John.

The words you use when you are the last man standing at a swingers party.

Edited by Costock_Fox
Posted

That's Watford relegated for me. It'd take a massive boost of energy and a manager with both a tough hand and the convincing personality to drag the Hornets out of their misery. Sadly, I can't see it happening.

Are they better than Everton, Newcastle, Brighton, Villa? Nope.

 

No reasonable manager will want to join a club with such a revolving door policy.

Posted

Watford have a decentish squad but I wouldn’t want any of their players even as squad players which says a lot.

Posted
1 minute ago, Stadt said:

Watford have a decentish squad but I wouldn’t want any of their players even as squad players which says a lot.

They didn't do enough in the summer. They have good players, but they needed some fresh faces. Squads become stale. Even if that meant moving some on too.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Facecloth said:

They didn't do enough in the summer. They have good players, but they needed some fresh faces. Squads become stale. Even if that meant moving some on too.

Their fullbacks are shit. One of the most unforgiving positions, not a surprise we were poor at the back when our fullbacks were any of Schlupp/Konchesky/De Laet.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Facecloth said:

They didn't do enough in the summer. They have good players, but they needed some fresh faces. Squads become stale. Even if that meant moving some on too.

It doesn’t help when they sign 10 plus players most seasons with loads of loans so players have no commitment.

 

Its only a matter of time before they go down again even if they get out of it this year.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Stadt said:

Their fullbacks are shit. One of the most unforgiving positions, not a surprise we were poor at the back when our fullbacks were any of Schlupp/Konchesky/De Laet.

I didn't realise Holebas is 35 until recently. For a team playing wing backs, how are they expecting a 35 year old to cover the length of the pitch for 90 minutes I'll never know. Plenty of good youngsters in the divisions below at reasonable prices.

Edited by Facecloth
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...