mozartfox Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 Would prefer Lenny Glover or Jackie Sinclair. Much cheaper options and less likely to disturb the dressing room. With him and Wes having a combined age of 70+, it looks like BR is looking to reverse Puel’s high tensity youthful approach.
bpfox Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 i think his signing would be as good as when we got cammbiasso ( hope the spelling close.) think they where about the same age, when coming to us and how good was cammbo.
st albans fox Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 38 minutes ago, bpfox said: i think his signing would be as good as when we got cammbiasso ( hope the spelling close.) think they where about the same age, when coming to us and how good was cammbo. Cambo stood out because he was brilliant at reading the game .....like a beacon of sanity and relaxation amongst a pitch full of chaos ... but we were immature at this level back then. We are trying to push top six ...... the only question I would have is - how fit is he?
surrifox Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 3 hours ago, mozartfox said: Would prefer Lenny Glover or Jackie Sinclair. Much cheaper options and less likely to disturb the dressing room. With him and Wes having a combined age of 70+, it looks like BR is looking to reverse Puel’s high tensity youthful approach. Both terrific players although Glover can be disruptive in his day . Both would cost less though especially Jackie on account of him being dead these past 10 years
PaulW Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 21 minutes ago, surrifox said: Both terrific players although Glover can be disruptive in his day . Both would cost less though especially Jackie on account of him being dead these past 10 years Don't be so negative.
lgfualol Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 His bald head irritates me so not keen. Would rather buy a different class winger who is like 15 years younger because Robben will be out injured and we'll just end up back with Gray and Albrighton.
Babylon Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 4 minutes ago, lgfualol said: His bald head irritates me so not keen.
weller54 Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 33 minutes ago, surrifox said: Both terrific players although Glover can be disruptive in his day . Both would cost less though especially Jackie on account of him being dead these past 10 years ... Still a better option than Iheanacho!
jock2612 Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 This, if true, is a giant step backwards. He will be injured a great deal. Wrong age. Will cost an absolute fortune . Definite no for me.
mozartfox Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 3 minutes ago, jock2612 said: This, if true, is a giant step backwards. He will be injured a great deal. Wrong age. Will cost an absolute fortune . Definite no for me. I am with you with this. Past his sell by date.
Haywood_6 Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 Imagine the amount of penalties we'll have awarded from him and Maddison diving. Oh wait... VAR
Sooper Steve's shin Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 Undeniable quality, but played less than 20 games last season, only 12 in the league. Ribery, a year older, played 37 (the most he has since 2014) and has done 30+ for each of the last three seasons. More in the tank? I’d love us to get one of them - great star quality and useful in the mix alongside Albrighton as another older head that Barnes and Gray could learn from. In that sense, maybe Robben’s previous EPL experience (and probably language) gives him the edge.
Ted Maul Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 30 minutes ago, IsItMuzzy said: Lot of Everton fans laughing at this one Rightly so- we'd be laughing at them if they were linked with one of our best players.
kmoson Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 Our latest podcast focuses mainly around transfer target rumours and speculation. Give it a spin if you please! All feedback, abuse etc. welcome. Cheers! Episode 8 of the podcast is a transfer special, full of speculation ahead of Rodgers' first window as Foxes boss. Skip to 11 mins to get right into the transfer talk. • Chelsea review • 2018/19 season review • Will the Tielemans move happen? • Discussion of numerous targets linked with Leicester City from around Europe • Can signing Robben or Ribery be like our move for Cambiasso? • Players we should look at selling • Reasons why Leicester can finish above Man Utd and Arsenal • Can we attract players who want to play in Europe? • Early predictions for 2019/20 season YouTube Spotify You can also listen & subscribe to us on iTunes podcasts!
st martin Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 Everton bloggers are saying Keane is better than Maguire. IMO, whilst I agree Keane is a good player, he is still not in Maguire's class.
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 4 hours ago, lgfualol said: His bald head irritates me so not keen. And his little goblin trollface, which always carries an expression that suggests the world owes him a penalty.
Babylon Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 22 minutes ago, st martin said: Everton bloggers are saying Keane is better than Maguire. IMO, whilst I agree Keane is a good player, he is still not in Maguire's class. Neutral much?
murphy Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 1 hour ago, IsItMuzzy said: Lot of Everton fans laughing at this one It's us that should be laughing. When they got Keane, we got Maguire. I know who I'd rather have.
kingcarr21 Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 I've never rated Keane but tbf to him he had a decent 2nd half to the season with Everton. He certainly isn't better than Maguire but if he continued his progress after the latter part of this season it wouldn't be a bad signing. If Maguire was to go then I don't see why we cant go forward with the CBs we have. Benkovic, Soyuncu, Evans and Morgan as our 4 CBs whilst promoting a young CB in to train with the first team and get some cup game action to break him into the squad before Morgans eventual departure makes perfect sense to me.
TMELcfc Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 4 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: He’s back! How? He’s been proved to be fake/talking sh*** so many times but people still follow him?!
turtmcfly Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 3 hours ago, Babylon said: Neutral much? I think you might be too old for that sh*t Babs!* Assuming you're not trying to be invert the zeitgeist (or you actually think they are neutral), It should be 'biased, much?'. Well I think it should, cos I doubt I'm any younger than you.
ARM1968 Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 Doubt we’ll need him. Better things to spend out money on.
Guest Mee-9 Posted 22 May 2019 Posted 22 May 2019 1 hour ago, urban.spaceman said: He’s back! There's more reliability on football transfers in Ainsley Harriott's left testicle than that account.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.