Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

What are your thoughts on VAR?  

679 members have voted

  1. 1. What are your thoughts on VAR?

    • Love it, all for it, fantastic introduction to football
      109
    • Hate it, games gone
      236
    • Somewhere in between
      334

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 17/05/20 at 19:00

Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, Golden Fox said:

And further below in that twitter thread is the plus/minus:

 

 

image.png.a785e438950eabae4019352041bdf1e9.png

 

Plenty of comments in the 8th place thread about what ifs from the Brighton and Man Utd away games & this does give some weight to those comments - but it shows us as the most hard done to team this year...

 

The Brighton match, especially, was concerning given that a rule was applied only in that match. I'm not sure how many (if any) goals were ruled out by VAR last season through obstruction of the Goalkeepers sight line. Something was not right. 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

The Brighton match, especially, was concerning given that a rule was applied only in that match. I'm not sure how many (if any) goals were ruled out by VAR last season through obstruction of the Goalkeepers sight line. Something was not right. 

We had one in our favour at Norwich away 

Posted
11 minutes ago, StanSP said:

We had one in our favour at Norwich away 

Exactly, so why were the two at Brighton ruled out? More importantly, why was that rule only applied in that match? 

Posted

We have been proper shafted this season. Hopefully it will turn around next season. That Brighton game still makes my piss boil. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

Exactly, so why were the two at Brighton ruled out? More importantly, why was that rule only applied in that match? 

They wanted us to finish 10th instead of 8th. We showed them though!

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Jonezy said:

We have been proper shafted this season. Hopefully it will turn around next season. That Brighton game still makes my piss boil. 

It was the defending of the decisions by Dermot Gallagher on Ref Watch, or whatever it's called, on Sky that boiled mine. I know that he's got previous for being an ignoramus but even so. Subscription cancelled. 

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted
9 hours ago, Tom12345 said:

West Ham did get robbed but they also massively got away with it in the week. The most blatant could throw for their goal. And bearing in mind that happens from a stationary position, there's no excuse for that no being pulled up during play, let alone on VAR.

 

Makes them even on VAR. Point gained, point lost.

Posted

Are we just getting poor officials on the pitch who are involved in VAR now telling younger refs to change their mind and probably spooking them into thinking they have made  an error ?

 

Can be no surprise the best ref in the league was the one who stuck to his original view whilst everyone else was make a right mess of things .

 

I have always thought it’s very subjective and really you are just at the mercy of a couple of blokes who have very different views on an incident .

Posted
Just now, dmayne7 said:

West Ham did get robbed but they also massively got away with it in the week. The most blatant could throw for their goal. And bearing in mind that happens from a stationary position, there's no excuse for that no being pulled up during play, let alone on VAR.

 

Makes them even on VAR. Point gained, point lost.

Can VAR rule on foul throws ?

Posted
Just now, dmayne7 said:

West Ham did get robbed but they also massively got away with it in the week. The most blatant could throw for their goal. And bearing in mind that happens from a stationary position, there's no excuse for that no being pulled up during play, let alone on VAR.

 

Makes them even on VAR. Point gained, point lost.

But if we’re going on the ‘it all evens itself out’ angle then scrap var (away from auto offsides - which are coming)  because the benefits aren’t there. 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

 

 

I have always thought it’s very subjective and really you are just at the mercy of a couple of blokes who have very different views on an incident .

And that’s it in a nutshell - the one thing that var is not supposed to be is subjective - it’s garbage. Scrap it until they find a way to make it purely objective 

Edited by st albans fox
Posted
4 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

Can VAR rule on foul throws ?

Don't know and there's another problem with it, how does it apply? Foul throw to the assister, who passed it on and the ball is in the back of the net with the next touch. It's so close to the goal being scored it's not like you can say it happened 30 seconds ago.

 

Gutted that Chelsea didn't lose though

Posted
4 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

And that’s it in a nutshell - the one thing that var is not supposed to be is subjective - it’s garbage. Scrap it until they find a way to make it purely objective 

Handball is a particular lottery which VAR has not improved as we still get debatable decisions all the time .

Posted
9 hours ago, Tom12345 said:

One of the most disgusting decisions I’ve ever seen. Absolute disgrace.

Posted
1 minute ago, Super_horns said:

Handball is a particular lottery which VAR has not improved as we still get debatable decisions all the time .

I just think that giving the on field ref more control is a possible answer. If they didn’t see something clearly (and neither did their assistants) then they can review it. No need for a var to be involved other than to reply to a question from the ref ‘do I need to check that’ as opposed to the var suggesting that they do. let the ref be the ref. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, OwnGoal said:

That was nothing compared to the fist to the face Nacho took in that game.  

What was staggering was the panel agreeing with the decision after the match with the defense du Bruyne has a right to protect his face, I couldn't believe what I was hearing, and it cost us

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...