Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Weird that Perez was preferred to him as back up striker.  Sometimes Rodgers see things in a way I think a bit strange,  most of the time he turns out to be right though.

 

I would not like to see Vardy rushed back so I hope Iheanacho is centre forward for at least the next game.

Posted

He's a jack of all trades and master of none, in Vardys absence that does us fine  he is so so so much more talented than Pérez - hold up play, passing, first touch, finishing. No idea why Ayoze sometimes gets the nod over him to lead the line.  We'd have beaten Leeds with Kel starting.

  • Like 4
Guest Hansifüx
Posted

happy he scored (and credits should go to maddsion), but otherwise absent ... lucky that fulham can't score 

Posted
Just now, Arriba Los Zorros said:

He's a jack of all trades and master of none, in Vardys absence that does us fine  he is so so so much more talented than Pérez - hold up play, passing, first touch, finishing. No idea why Ayoze sometimes gets the nod over him to lead the line.  We'd have beaten Leeds with Kel starting.

It's was nuts when BR deemed to think Perez was the next in line after Vards to play up top. Kel is a natural striker. Perez is not.

  • Like 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, Hansifüx said:

happy he scored (and credits should go to maddsion), but otherwise absent ... lucky that fulham can't score 

I'm not convinced you actually watched the game? 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Guest Col city fan
Posted

Hopefully that’ll give him exactly the confidence boost he needed 

Posted

He is a confidence player and needs to play, his link up play is very good, some really good turns to beat his man, much better team set up than the Leeds game, this team would have beaten Leeds, Everton proving how poor they are.

Posted

Really positive tonight from Iheanacho and showed all that's good about his game in both goals. Great dart into the box and excellent header to finish it off for the first goal, and a sublime turn and through ball combo in the build up for the second goal. He also put himself about well and pressed from the front which he's sometimes lacking. That will have done him the world of good tonight. Well done Nacho.

  • Like 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, NewquayFox said:

Took his goal well, had a hand in the 2nd and kept running all night, has to start against Wolves now... 

Yes he played well but he did not run all night, he was completely exhausted after 65 minutes...if his fitness gets better i am sure it will really help him hold his place.

  • Like 1
Guest Manini
Posted

Was good tonight, pleased for him. I was saying to my dad after Sunday it’s alright saying both Pérez and Ihenacho are shit, which lets be honest for large periods they have been, but at least Ihenacho is an actual striker and plays where a striker should. If Pérez is up front tonight he doesn’t score that goal. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Hansifüx said:

happy he scored (and credits should go to maddsion), but otherwise absent ... lucky that fulham can't score 

Errr.. you may have missed that he was BT Sport 'Man of the Match'?

  • Like 1
Posted

You could tell he was utterly shattered after about 75mins but that was to be expected. He'd have surely loved being out there for the whole game though and he must be delighted he took his chances. Hopefully his confidence remains high.

Posted
3 minutes ago, hejammy said:

I'm not sure it's "crawling back up his arse" - it's more of a case of credit where credit is due. If you're gonna criticise him when he plays poor you have to give him credit when he plays well? 

The same people will be calling for him to never play for us again when he misses his next sitter

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...