Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
FoxinNotts

Steven Bergwijn

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, trickytrevbenjamin said:

Saw PSV play in November and he looked a level above the other players. Scored two and only played 60 mins. Would be surprised if they allowed him to leave especially on loan. 

 

If we loan anyone it's going to be to buy them it we qualify for the CL tbf 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jeffschlupp said:

Do we know what Di Marzio actually said?

 

They tend to do a late night 'transfer blitz' so we might get something later.

 

Bergwijn himself is playing tonight for PSV in the cup at Breda.

Well that’s put paid to that then ........

 

shortest transfer thread ever ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defending on that YT is an absolute joke.

He may be faster than Perez. But no way is he better with the ball at his feet or putting it in the net. And we paid 30mil for Perez.

Looks like he has enormous potential but he's a project. Not the immediate answer to our largest problem/goals.

I'm seeing good things happening in the Rodgers reclamation/makeover projects that we have now. Loan with option to buy for me. Keep our options open.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Why would PSV loan him, makes no sense for them, flops he value goes down. 

Probably put a fee in there to make it permanent that is higher than usual. That means we get time to asses him and get some insurance on the deal. We could have got Tielemans cheaper if we straight out brought him but that would have been a big risk plus the player at the time might not have wanted a permanent move. So perhaps it’s something like that?

 

It could also be creative accounting. PSG signed Neymar and Mbappe in the same window by “loaning” him from Monaco with an obligation to buy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might simply be that a loan is quicker and easier than a full transfer to complete at this point in the window -from an administrative point of view. If there was the possibility of a permanent switch in the future that is, as there was with Youri Tielemans.

Edited by Paddy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Deeg67 said:

Yes, obviously - but sounds like codswallop.  Why would PSV do it?

 

They're twelve points behind Ajax and their season is basically done. 

 

If it's true (and I doubt it tbf) we'll no doubt be paying them a reasonable loan fee and agreeing to buy him for a tidy sum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, StriderHiryu said:

Probably put a fee in there to make it permanent that is higher than usual. That means we get time to asses him and get some insurance on the deal. We could have got Tielemans cheaper if we straight out brought him but that would have been a big risk plus the player at the time might not have wanted a permanent move. So perhaps it’s something like that?

 

It could also be creative accounting. PSG signed Neymar and Mbappe in the same window by “loaning” him from Monaco with an obligation to buy. 

Maybe :fc:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...