lozzyblue fox Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Obviously they are hating the fact we are still up there with the so called top 6. Will do anything to bring Chelsea back In the mix. Plus it seems the refs want rid of var so doing everything in there power to bring all these reactions from fans whom want it to go and as you can see from nearly all forums it's working.
Aus Fox Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 2 minutes ago, st albans fox said: He punches the ball into kel .... keepers will always get away with that aggressive intent ..... youre taught that if you come that far then you take the ball and everything with you - has he been second to the ball then suspect we would have got the decision .... He makes zero contact with the ball, he arrives about 2 seconds after the ball is out of play. He doesn’t punch anything other than Iheanacho.
st albans fox Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Expect a very tough first fifteen upcoming - they will want to be ahead before they make their planned changes ....
Scotch Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 3 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said: Yeah being a professional footballer doesn’t rob your natural instincts to stop a 70 mph object flying into your face, he’s not had time to think about anything it’s just instinct. Arms close enough to the body, below shoulder height. This is all on the assumption there is a rule you are allowed to protect your face and if there isn’t. Then yes it’s a penalty He wasn't protecting his face though as he had already moved out of the way. If he just stood head on, yes protect your face but he moved out the way the put his hands were his face was....Handball.
RowlattsFox Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 If the ref doesn't give it then we know Coote isn't brave enough to overturn.
splinterdream Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 What's the game come to when it's being asked if whether Du Bruynue is entitled to protect his face, absolutely bizarre thing to ask
st albans fox Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Just now, Aus Fox said: He makes zero contact with the ball, he arrives about 2 seconds after the ball is out of play. He doesn’t punch anything other than Iheanacho. Sky just showed the slow mo and he did - just
mozartfox Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Pointless going over previous decisions. We were shagged, but it is how it is. Let’s get into them from the off.
TheStig Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 11 minutes ago, NaijaFox said: Can someone explain in Plain English HOW WAS THAT NOT A PEN?! Yes - its Man City.......
The Guvnor Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 KDB incident was handball,and penalty, cannot understand why anyone could think otherwise, truly baffled.
Tom12345 Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Wonder if Vardy could have rounded the keeper instead for his chance given how far the keeper went up ... anyway, what a chance it was.
The Guvnor Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Nacho not recovered I suspect so Barnes on.
Les-TA-Jon Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 So in short, we no longer know what: * handball is * a red card is * a foul is
foxfan92 Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 5 minutes ago, Merging Cultures said: Commentators at half time saying De Bruyne was a peno. Everyone who saw it apart from the ref on the pitch and the one supposedly watching on a screen knew it was a clear cut penalty
foxfan92 Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Barnes on for Nacho. Hope he's okay, he looked good.
lgfualol Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Would be a pen if one of our players did that. ****ing bullshit. Why be in the wall if you have to cover your face
RumbleFox Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 7 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said: Yeah being a professional footballer doesn’t rob your natural instincts to stop a 70 mph object flying into your face, he’s not had time to think about anything it’s just instinct. Arms close enough to the body, below shoulder height. This is all on the assumption there is a rule you are allowed to protect your face and if there isn’t. Then yes it’s a penalty Surely his hand was above shoulder height? I s that not a definite penalty? X
Kitchandro Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Just now, TheUltimateWinner said: Ah this shit again Ridiculous. A collision is one thing, but one of that severity was not inevitable if the goalkeeper had any concern for the other players safety. Iheanacho was hanging in the air, whereas Ederson came out full-blooded and knocked him over. It's not like Iheanacho was equally at fault.
Tielemans63 Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 G'won Harvey. Make me feel unbearably smug once more.
Tom12345 Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 What a shame Nachos had to go off. Obviously he is a bit concussed
Manwell Pablo Posted 22 February 2020 Posted 22 February 2020 Just now, Facecloth said: His natural reaction was to move out the way, which he did with plenty of time to spare as there was a big enough gap to get a ball through, and he filled that gap with his arm. His hands coming up is a natural reaction, just because he’s moved his head as well doesn’t mean his hands coming up aren’t, at the end the movement his hands are crossed in from of his face. Anyway, I’m not discussing this all night. 😂 it is what it is.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.