filbertway Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 Thought that was proper harsh on Digne. Look accidental to me. If chasing a player is dangerous play then there should be hundreds of reds every week. 3
RowlattsFox Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 Definitely more intent than the commentators are saying. He could've avoided him if he wanted too. 4
filbertway Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 Wolves vs Toon next. On paper this game could cure insomnia. Two teams that are very anti football and hate possession.
davieG Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 4 minutes ago, filbertway said: Wolves vs Toon next. On paper this game could cure insomnia. Two teams that are very anti football and hate possession. If Wolves win we need to get something from the Arse otherwise we'll be stuck in Mid-table.
UniFox21 Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 On a plus, Calvert-Lewin's scoring streak ends at 5 games 1
Dr The Singh Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 5 minutes ago, davieG said: If Wolves win we need to get something from the Arse otherwise we'll be stuck in Mid-table. Were going to be stuck up someone's Arse and still be mid table
Tielemans63 Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 Completely disagree with Redknapp, I think Digne 100% meant to do that. Nasty, nasty challenge. 3
UniFox21 Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 Redknapp saying the game is gone for that Digne sending off. No intent at all, but he's planted one on Walker-Peters ankle, he's lucky nothing has broken there 2
winteriscoming Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 Redknapp saying it’s not a red card. Prat. Stick to selling trainers. 1
surrifox Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 1 hour ago, Fox in the North said: Would take Hasenhuttl after Rodgers if he was available. The last ex saints manager worked out well for us - what could go wrong ? 1
filbertway Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 I'm glad Redknapp is seeing what I seem. I thought I was losing my mind
Fox in the North Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 Just now, surrifox said: The last ex saints manager worked out well for us - what could go wrong ? Puel wasn’t everyone’s cup of tea, but he was far from the worst. Hasenhuttl seems to have really found his feet and I like his style of football. It might be a suitable option for our young group of players, especially when we hopefully start producing better quality players from our new training ground. 1
UniFox21 Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 1 minute ago, filbertway said: I'm glad Redknapp is seeing what I seem. I thought I was losing my mind I don't think agreeing with Redknapp is a good measure of not losing your mind 1
The Bear Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 30 minutes ago, davieG said: If Wolves win we need to get something from the Arse otherwise we'll be stuck in Mid-table. Not looking forward to this game, even if it is Newcastle. They are a bit of a bogey side for us. 1993 was our last home win against them, and they have gone very attacking due to injuries with a midfield full of wingers. Literally 6 of them on the pitch!!
Guest Kopfkino Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 What does endangering your opponent actually mean? Surely any challenge where a player gets injured is one that endangers them but we don't send players off every time someone gets injured. The Digne one looks nasty but it just looks really unfortunate to me.
Corky Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 1-0 Wolves (Jimenez 62), Newcastle 1 shot on target, 34 backroom staff celebrating the winner. 1
UniFox21 Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 7 minutes ago, Kopfkino said: What does endangering your opponent actually mean? Surely any challenge where a player gets injured is one that endangers them but we don't send players off every time someone gets injured. The Digne one looks nasty but it just looks really unfortunate to me. I think endangering is obviously open to interpretation, but watching that challenge back Digne plants his foot on the ankle and it's one of those with a little misfortune can cause an ankle break. I don't think it was a wrong decision 1
The Bear Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 8 minutes ago, Corky said: 1-0 Wolves (Jimenez 62), Newcastle 1 shot on target, 34 backroom staff celebrating the winner. I'd take that right now thanks.
UniFox21 Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 44 minutes ago, davieG said: If Wolves win we need to get something from the Arse otherwise we'll be stuck in Mid-table. Still early days in this season. If we're upper mid table within touching distance on Europe then that's still acceptable. 1
Lambert09 Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 You could see Digne was going to have another pop a mile off. Interestingly though, he was already going to get a yellow for the first attempt to foul him, is it possible to get 2 yellow cards in the same phase? Because surely he deserves 2 just for that? But the second obviously was a straight red but ive never seen an incident where a player gets an advantage to only be chopped by the same player again. Surely thats still 2 separate incidents?
StanSP Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 Reckon the red was the right call for Digne. And as a result, not a clear and obvious mistake from the ref. You just simply can't be allowed to go studs on achilles. It does look worse because the studs stay on there as Walker-Peters falls, but even if that didn't happen, it's still a red.
Lambert09 Posted 25 October 2020 Posted 25 October 2020 I might be biased on this but not sure how people can argue that’s not dangerous. I actually had my Achilles ruptured by something similar and it’s so unnecessary. It’s moronic, he has every intention to foul him, but why go in like that, just trip the bloke
Recommended Posts