1972 Fox Posted 10 August 2020 Posted 10 August 2020 On 09/08/2020 at 20:32, Bourbon Fox said: Jesus Christ, is there no limit to the man's bellendery?!! On 09/08/2020 at 20:56, Samilktray said: He’s drinking water Jesus would have turned his water into wine.
HighPeakFox Posted 10 August 2020 Posted 10 August 2020 44 minutes ago, Farrington fox said: Wtf is that top he's waring, looks a girls. Blackadder: To you, Baldrick, the Renaissance was just something that happened to other people, wasn't it?
HighPeakFox Posted 11 August 2020 Posted 11 August 2020 42 minutes ago, majaco said: Surely supporters should get behind our players. You'd have thought, wouldn't you?
urban fox Posted 11 August 2020 Posted 11 August 2020 43 minutes ago, majaco said: Surely supporters should get behind our players. Yes but this is FT.
norwichfox Posted 11 August 2020 Posted 11 August 2020 10 hours ago, Blue Fox 72 said: Jesus would have turned his water into wine. Just by adding 2 level teaspoons of the red powder and stirring vigorously....
Ric Flair Posted 11 August 2020 Posted 11 August 2020 12 hours ago, foxinsocks said: Anyone think we play better without him? (His corners are not improving...for that money I think he could practice them) A fully fit and on form Maddison, no we don't. Maddison when he's dropped about as deep as Ndidi and slowing down play in our own half then yes we probably do.
urban fox Posted 11 August 2020 Posted 11 August 2020 At least we won't have to put up with a daily barrage of media rubbish about him going to utd for the rest of the summer. Lets hope he is fully recovered from his hip injury and shows some of the form from the first half of the season.
Lesta2014 Posted 11 August 2020 Posted 11 August 2020 guess this be announced when he returns for pre season?
foxinsocks Posted 11 August 2020 Posted 11 August 2020 2 hours ago, Ric Flair said: A fully fit and on form Maddison, no we don't. Maddison when he's dropped about as deep as Ndidi and slowing down play in our own half then yes we probably do. I think that's it - the key is how we play him (or what he does).
Sol thewall Bamba Posted 11 August 2020 Posted 11 August 2020 4 hours ago, majaco said: Surely supporters should get behind our players. Comments on a forum that won't get read by the players are pretty much as inconsequential as you can get. As long as when the players are on the pitch and the fans are in the stands things are positive, that's fine in my opinion. Back them during the game, praise/call them out afterwards as necessary.
fuchsntf Posted 11 August 2020 Posted 11 August 2020 11 hours ago, majaco said: Surely supporters should get behind our players. Bellends always taper down .....!!! They know nothing of any supporting task....
turkish14 Posted 11 August 2020 Posted 11 August 2020 1 hour ago, fuchsntf said: Bellends always taper down .....!!! They know nothing of any supporting task.... Many in this fragile world have become “entitled”... I see it across all of the Range of social spectrums and society.
fuchsntf Posted 12 August 2020 Posted 12 August 2020 22 hours ago, Sol thewall Bamba said: Comments on a forum that won't get read by the players are pretty much as inconsequential as you can get. As long as when the players are on the pitch and the fans are in the stands things are positive, that's fine in my opinion. Back them during the game, praise/call them out afterwards as necessary. Lambasting them, over their Choice of clobber & dress....Shows The immaturity of the poster....Plus a few use it on the side to build or make an agenda,when bringing in other issues...for The Male of the species,its somehow suprising how much the bitch,they can hold their female partners /Sisters accountable for.... Not many real men left to have a decent Football Conversation with on football forums today...!!
turkish14 Posted 12 August 2020 Posted 12 August 2020 1 hour ago, fuchsntf said: Lambasting them, over their Choice of clobber & dress....Shows The immaturity of the poster....Plus a few use it on the side to build or make an agenda,when bringing in other issues...for The Male of the species,its somehow suprising how much the bitch,they can hold their female partners /Sisters accountable for.... Not many real men left to have a decent Football Conversation with on football forums today...!! Absolutely 👍
shade Posted 12 August 2020 Posted 12 August 2020 2 hours ago, fuchsntf said: Lambasting them, over their Choice of clobber & dress....Shows The immaturity of the poster....Plus a few use it on the side to build or make an agenda,when bringing in other issues...for The Male of the species,its somehow suprising how much the bitch,they can hold their female partners /Sisters accountable for.... Not many real men left to have a decent Football Conversation with on football forums today...!! bet you wear brogues and cropped chinos, ughh.
fuchsntf Posted 12 August 2020 Posted 12 August 2020 42 minutes ago, shade said: bet you wear brogues and cropped chinos, ughh. No idea what they are...... but I'll have a laugh with you...
oxtonfox Posted 12 August 2020 Posted 12 August 2020 £22m sounds like a nice contract for Madders. Can’t see him staying that long if he does well in the next 1-2 seasons which we hope he will.
Guest Lako42 Posted 13 August 2020 Posted 13 August 2020 Football is gone (again) when Maddison is on this amount of money. He needs to seriously improve his key stats (assists, goals) to warrant such a wage. Does this count as not supporting him? Or are we all supposed to be pleased about us spending beyond our means on players who haven't achieved what they should have done? I wonder if the extra dosh is enough to entice him not to go and have a nice laugh with the opposition as soon as the final whistle goes? Especially when we've just lost.
HighPeakFox Posted 13 August 2020 Posted 13 August 2020 23 minutes ago, Lako42 said: I wonder if the extra dosh is enough to entice him not to go and have a nice laugh with the opposition as soon as the final whistle goes? Especially when we've just lost. You really should negotiate contracts.
Guest Manini Posted 14 August 2020 Posted 14 August 2020 23 hours ago, Lako42 said: Does this count as not supporting him? Or are we all supposed to be pleased about us spending beyond our means on players who haven't achieved what they should have done? Whilst I agree the fee is extortionate, I’m confused by this part of your post... I can’t imagine Susan Whelan would be in a job for much longer if she was signing off salaries that the club couldn’t afford. I’m fairly sure she and the owners have spent infinitely more time than any of us with the club accountants working out what we can pay players and what we can’t. We haven’t spent beyond our means since probably Sven was here, early 2000s before that, so it feels like you’re getting yourself wound up over nothing there.
Guest Lako42 Posted 15 August 2020 Posted 15 August 2020 On 14/08/2020 at 10:58, Manini said: Whilst I agree the fee is extortionate, I’m confused by this part of your post... I can’t imagine Susan Whelan would be in a job for much longer if she was signing off salaries that the club couldn’t afford. I’m fairly sure she and the owners have spent infinitely more time than any of us with the club accountants working out what we can pay players and what we can’t. We haven’t spent beyond our means since probably Sven was here, early 2000s before that, so it feels like you’re getting yourself wound up over nothing there. You do realise this is modern football? Of course we are spending beyond our means, to believe anything else is utterly deluded. We are consistently taking out huge loans against future TV money, this is about as obvious an example of a club spending beyond its means as anything I've ever seen. It eclipses the overspend in the Sven era by a substantial amount. The stats achieved by Maddison last season do not warrant this salary, its quite absurd.
coolhandfox Posted 15 August 2020 Posted 15 August 2020 10 minutes ago, Lako42 said: You do realise this is modern football? Of course we are spending beyond our means, to believe anything else is utterly deluded. We are consistently taking out huge loans against future TV money, this is about as obvious an example of a club spending beyond its means as anything I've ever seen. It eclipses the overspend in the Sven era by a substantial amount. The stats achieved by Maddison last season do not warrant this salary, its quite absurd. To get the money early rather then in staged payments, not to spend more money the we have coming in. We have made a loss in 1 of the last 5 seasons.
Guest Manini Posted 15 August 2020 Posted 15 August 2020 1 hour ago, Lako42 said: You do realise this is modern football? Of course we are spending beyond our means, to believe anything else is utterly deluded. We are consistently taking out huge loans against future TV money, this is about as obvious an example of a club spending beyond its means as anything I've ever seen. It eclipses the overspend in the Sven era by a substantial amount. The stats achieved by Maddison last season do not warrant this salary, its quite absurd. Ey? It’s a loan against money that then comes in to the club account the following season. It’s guaranteed against the money that we are then at liberty to pay back. It’s to ease cash flow. If we were consistently borrowing more then we could afford then James Maddison’s salary would be the least of your worries because we’d be on the way to going bust!
turkish14 Posted 15 August 2020 Posted 15 August 2020 2 hours ago, Lako42 said: You do realise this is modern football? Of course we are spending beyond our means, to believe anything else is utterly deluded. We are consistently taking out huge loans against future TV money, this is about as obvious an example of a club spending beyond its means as anything I've ever seen. It eclipses the overspend in the Sven era by a substantial amount. The stats achieved by Maddison last season do not warrant this salary, its quite absurd. So you don’t think Maddison was excellent up to the new year?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.