Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Wymsey

US Presidential Election 2020

By Wymsey, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

Sampson

Sampson

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, WigstonWanderer said:

Constantly throws me that Democrats are blue and Republicans are red.
 

Do they use the phrase ”Reds under the bed”?

It's because the parties flipped sides on issues in the early 20th century around the time of Taft, but the colours remained the same.

 

Republicans used to be the more progressive party and Democrats were the more conservative one as you'd expect from their colours. Hence why Abraham Lincoln and the anti-Slavery movement was Republican. Teddy Roosevelt didn't like Taft's more conservative approach and they ended up having a big rift and I guess the Republicans became the more Conservative party from Taft onward.

Edited by Sampson
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
ozleicester

ozleicester

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, WigstonWanderer said:

There are arguments for and against first past the post when it come to electing representatives in a parliament, but it surely makes no sense at all for a binary choice of a single individual as president.

 

The US system may have made some historic sense at the time it was adopted, but in the modern context, what on earth is wrong with one person one vote?

No photo description available.

  • Like 2
Buce

Buce

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

You seem to know your stuff, @UPinCarolina, so a question for you:

 

From what I can gather, Trump - as a 'lame duck' president - still has the power to make executive orders; are there any fears over what he might do between now and Jan 20th?

Edited by Buce
WigstonWanderer

WigstonWanderer

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, ozleicester said:

No photo description available.

All in favour of single transferable vote, or whatever. The point is that in the current US system, they don’t even try (as I understand) to ensure that each person gets the same weight to their vote, the number of voters per electoral college vote varies from state to state. Also, most states allocate all their electoral college votes to a single candidate regardless of the voting split in that state.

 

Just having one person one vote for the whole of the US (so each state reports the number of votes for each candidate and then they get summed nationally) would be a huge step forward. A scheme like the Australian one above, whilst being the fairest IMO, might be difficult to arrange if you want to keep voting state based. Not impossible but it really demands a whole of country vote.

Edited by WigstonWanderer
shen

shen

Posted
Posted

So the media are heralding this as a historic election due to the sheer volume of votes cast. The US is still ridiculously low in voter participation  compared to other exemplary democratic states. I'm having a hard time listening to either party praising the US system when such a large section of their population still isn't voting! 

trabuch

trabuch

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Buce said:

 

You seem to know your stuff, @UPinCarolina, so a question for you:

 

From what I can gather, Trump - as a 'lame duck' president - still has the power to make executive orders; are there any fears over what he might do between now and Jan 20th?

I'm sure @UPinCarolina will know more about exactly what he is able to do. But this interview with his niece is pretty chilling.

 

https://www.channel4.com/news/mary-trump-on-donald-trump-if-he-thinks-hes-going-down-hes-going-to-try-to-take-the-rest-of-us-down-with-him

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Countryfox

Countryfox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Buce said:

 

You seem to know your stuff, @UPinCarolina, so a question for you:

 

From what I can gather, Trump - as a 'lame duck' president - still has the power to make executive orders; are there any fears over what he might do between now and Jan 20th?


Anything from having Biden assassinated to starting WWIII ....    

shen

shen

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot said:

70% is a massive turnout for an election. 

It is far below many other democratic countries and I suspect has been fuelled by the massively polarizing effect of having Trump as your president. Not sure why you think it's "massive".

 

Innovindil

Innovindil

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, shen said:

It is far below many other democratic countries and I suspect has been fuelled by the massively polarizing effect of having Trump as your president. Not sure why you think it's "massive".

 

Probably because American elections rarely hit 60% turnout. So it is massive for them. 

shen

shen

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Innovindil said:

Probably because American elections rarely hit 60% turnout. So it is massive for them. 

Which is exactly my point. The US media and politicians are quick to blow their own horn, but it's still pretty far below a plethora of democracies around the world. 

  • Like 1
shen

shen

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot said:

More than the UK is all I know. I don't know turnouts in other countries. 

I expressly said compared to other democracies and you compare it to one country, which is equally on the lower side of voter turnout ? :huh:

Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot

Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, shen said:

I expressly said compared to other democracies and you compare it to one country, which is equally on the lower side of voter turnout ? :huh:

Yeah you're right I'm not saying you're not, I openly admit I don't know much about turnouts in elections. 70% seemed a lot to me, going on what limited knowledge I have on UK and US turnouts. Clearly it isn't all that much. I expressly apologise for my ignorance. 

shen

shen

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot said:

Yeah you're right I'm not saying you're not, I openly admit I don't know much about turnouts in elections. 70% seemed a lot to me, going on what limited knowledge I have on UK and US turnouts. Clearly it isn't all that much. I expressly apologise for my ignorance. 

No worries. It's my personal frustration at the navel-gazing and self-heralding that usually comes from the bullshit US media. If they truly believe they are the envy of the world and that they are the model democracy, then they are deluded to the core.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...