Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Col city fan
Posted
6 minutes ago, surrifox said:

That bench ! 

Apart from Big Dan Amartey 

😉

Posted

Lovely stuff. Should do these with that lineup.

 

Keep it away from Wilson at feet and we can deal with them with that backline. No Shelvey in the starting lineup a bonus - even if he's not the player he was, his searching balls always worry me when we play these 

 

inb4 Joelinton decides to have his one good game in 20 now i've said that

Posted

I like having Castagne and Justin both on – means Rodgers has the option to swap them around if needed.

 

Ricardo is better than either as a RB or RWB, but having those two offers more options. 

 

What a team we're building here!

 

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, ronnup said:

He's in for his defending work, JJ will get forward. 

I know, but I don't particularly think we need to think too much about defensive reinforcements against Newcastle.

 

Feels like a wasted attacking option to break down a team that will turn up to defend.

 

  • Like 2
Posted

I thought we might see Under start but I guess a Cameo will test his Fitness without risking him from the start.

 

Albrighton offers more defensive cover that Perez which is why he gets the Nod over him.

Guest Col city fan
Posted
2 minutes ago, norwichfox said:

agreed, he should be starting....:fishing:

Bloody wum!

😆

Posted
2 minutes ago, Nod.E said:

I know, but I don't particularly think we need to think too much about defensive reinforcements against Newcastle.

 

Feels like a wasted attacking option to break down a team that will turn up to defend.

 

But give you attacking options on the bench if need. 

 

 

Posted

That's as good a team as we can field and gives me a lot of confidence.

 

I get Albrighton playing, he works hard both in attack and defence. Let's get control of the game,  and then look at bringing on ünder to take advantage of a more tired Newcastle.

 

Absolutely no excuses today.

 

Bring it on.

Posted

Terrifies me that people are talking about a winger needing to offer defensive protection against Newcastle.

 

Love the echo chamber that is the internet lol

Posted

I like Albrighton but I’m not sure it’s worth playing him instead of say a Perez if only Vardy is up top  to convert his decent deliveries. Still it’s a strong side and we should be threatening a win I hope. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, filbertway said:

Terrifies me that people are talking about a winger needing to offer defensive protection against Newcastle.

 

Love the echo chamber that is the internet lol

They may not be that good but doesn't mean they can't pose a threat. It's good to have defensive cover. I don't get why it's such a contentious point for Albrighton to play. It means it's a side that can be well-balanced. 

 

No doubt if we were caught on the break because Justin attacked down the right you'd get some fans being like 'if we had some defensive cover that could have been prevented' :dunno:

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Looing forward to Sky focusing on Chelsea, Man City, Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal and Spur, before talking about us and Newcastle for 5 mins 

Edited by coolhandfox
  • Haha 4
Posted

Albrighton should only play on the left but as Barnes is there he shouldn't really be starting against these on the other side but Perez/Under have hardly done enough to warrant a start either.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Don't have a issue with Albrighton, Under and Perez have hardly been pulling up trees at RM.

 

Still crying out for a quality RW.

Edited by coolhandfox
Posted
1 minute ago, coolhandfox said:

Looing forward to Sky focusing on Chelsea, Man City, Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal and Spur, before tlaing about us and Newcastle for 5 mins 

so true 

Posted

That Newcastle side is minging, and one we should be beating comfortably. 

 

Bring on the Sunday bore-draw.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...