Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, stu said:

 

Hed be great but pretty sure Chelsea have already said no.

Edited by Chocolate Teapot
Posted
3 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

Pissed me right off we never went all out to get him on a free transfer when he left Nice. He'd be perfect here.

We don't do free transfers here! 

  • Sad 1
Posted
2 hours ago, mozartfox said:

Not a chance. Chelsea are in 4 competitions plus they have not forgiven us for Danny Drinkwater.

They got Kante and Drinkwater for £70m combined.... Tbh I think that's pretty good value lol

Posted
4 hours ago, stu said:

 

Unfortunately sounds like old news. Someone mentioned we enquired but got knocked back because Chelsea want him as depth. He's played a couple of times for them in the league now too.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

Pissed me right off we never went all out to get him on a free transfer when he left Nice. He'd be perfect here.

Let be honest he was alway going to choose Chelsea over us, even if we went all in

Edited by coolhandfox
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, coolhandfox said:

Let be honest he was alway going to choose Chelsea over us, even if we went all in

Plenty of players opt to give up the prestige of being a fringe player at a big club to go in as a more important player at the next crop of clubs. We pay very well as well, he'll not be earning more at Chelsea than we'd have paid him. You only need to see what we throw about to players to see that. I read he's on less than 50k a week at Chelsea.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Plenty of players opt to give up the prestige of being a fringe player at a big club to go in as a more important player at the next crop of clubs. We pay very well as well, he'll not be earning more at Chelsea than we'd have paid him. You only need to see what we throw about to players to see that. I read he's on less than 50k a week at Chelsea.

 

 

Name the last player who signed for us over them? 

Posted
4 hours ago, mozartfox said:

Not a chance. Chelsea are in 4 competitions plus they have not forgiven us for Danny Drinkwater.

He has also started 2 out of the last 3 games for them. Can’t see this happening. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Grebfromgrebland said:

Possibly and we stalled his career

Not sure we did he just wasn't good enough for PL at the time. 

 

He was never going to get a sniff whilst Vardy play so well. 

 

He had a good career in the Bundesliga, at Hoffenheim after scoring 100 goals in 206 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Not sure we did he just wasn't good enough for PL at the time. 

 

He was never going to get a sniff whilst Vardy play so well. 

 

He had a good career in the Bundesliga, at Hoffenheim after scoring 100 goals in 206 

I don't think it was ever a case of him not being good enough. 

 

We played a specific style at the time and he didn't fit into that. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, coolhandfox said:

Name the last player who signed for us over them? 

Kramaric for definite but there was also strong reports that Daka could have gone to Chelsea or Liverpool but chose us.

 

As I've said, there's plenty that will go for prestige first and foremost but then there's also plenty that go for footballing reasons at a certain age and we've been the beneficiaries of that in recent years as we've grown as the go to club for young talent.

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted


Anyone know who Nixon is writing about here without giving him the satisfaction of paying for his Patreon? Or is it just him recycling his Sangare story for The Sun for a few extra pennies.

  • Like 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, Aleksz said:


Anyone know who Nixon is writing about here without giving him the satisfaction of paying for his Patreon? Or is it just him recycling his Sangare story for The Sun for a few extra pennies.

The problem role is probably referring to our RWer issue you’d think? 
 

also I don’t think he’s been right about us for a while so wouldn’t look too far into it 

Posted
23 minutes ago, lcfc sheff said:

The problem role is probably referring to our RWer issue you’d think? 
 

also I don’t think he’s been right about us for a while so wouldn’t look too far into it 

Pretty sure it’s Sangare as it describes in the Sun article that his height will help at both ends of the pitch at setpeices, which he states is our problem area.

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...