Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
dbtcity

Twitter Transfer Rumours

By dbtcity, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
fox_favourite

fox_favourite

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
Just now, em9999 said:

Psr is a big nonsense 

 

It only makes the big four more and more untouchable..

 

Making me hate football ⚽️ 

Football is all about paper pushing and not decided on the pitch. 

 

Football is dying and its getting worse. The enjoyment being sucked out of it because of money. 

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
Tielemans63

Tielemans63

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, em9999 said:

Psr is a big nonsense 

 

It only makes the big four more and more untouchable..

 

Making me hate football ⚽️ 

It's not even subtle is it? It's killing the competition dead. I'm sure this has been allowed to happen as a sweetener for the 'top clubs' following the failed European Super League. 

  • Like 2
ALC Fox

ALC Fox

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Ashley said:

We have a lot to answer for. 2016 stopped football as anyone knew it. 

 

Fairytale or not? We ****ed football for the good.

 

"We dont want another Leicester". 

 

This wasn't brought in to save little teams. It was brought in to shut up shop.

I don't know if it's Leicester that has a lot to answer for thanks to 2015/16.

 

I think it's the Premier League and football collectively. All clubs have sleep-walked into their own pigeon-holing at a certain level. Even the likes of Newcastle and Villa have had to reluctantly sell some of their better home-grown players who got/would get into their sides in the Champions League in order to satisfy PSR.

 

Villa - with their wage expenditure currently at 96% of their turnover - are firmly on the Leicester highway towards the bottom reaches of the Premier League and possibly beyond. They'll have to cut their cloth and sign cheaper players and offer less wages and, when Emery decides he's had enough, they could easily plummet.

 

'We don't want another Leicester' isn't our fault, I think. Football could have encouraged a more egalitarian league where more teams could win the division and it be more exciting as teams rise and fall and rise again. But it didn't in the belief that the league only does well if its elite does well. It's football's governance that has ****ed it.

  • Like 4
Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted (edited)

Sell bilal for 32, buy hackney for 15. Who says no?  Get some loans with obligation to buys for a striker and a 10 and we’re back 

Edited by Lambert09
  • Like 1
  • Popular Post
Jazzy_Jeff

Jazzy_Jeff

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
10 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:

Sell bilal for 32, buy hackney for 15. Who says no?  Get some loans with obligation to buys for a striker and a 10 and we’re back 

Hackney probably 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 15
JimJams

JimJams

Posted
Posted

Hackney would be a coup really.  Boro supposedly accepted a £20mill offer from Ipswich but he didn't want to go.  Presumably waiting on Premier League interest.  

 

Why the fxxk would he come here?

  • Like 1
Brizzle Fox

Brizzle Fox

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:

Sell bilal for 32, buy hackney for 15. Who says no?  Get some loans with obligation to buys for a striker and a 10 and we’re back 

He's got his eyes on Prem League. Won't see us as an upgrade on Boro (already turned Ipswich down).

 

Don't do it to yourself. Just accept we're getting no one (decent, if at all).

lanefox

lanefox

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, JimJams said:

Hackney would be a coup really.  Boro supposedly accepted a £20mill offer from Ipswich but he didn't want to go.  Presumably waiting on Premier League interest.  

 

Why the fxxk would he come here?

Because we'll pay him 80k a week

  • Like 1
LCFCCKEANO

LCFCCKEANO

Posted
Posted

Later in the window imagine Hackney gets more likely to take a ‘lesser’ side, his prem opportunities all seem to have fallen through, similar to Brownhill, could see either going to Ipswich on deadline day

moore_94

moore_94

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

Unpopular opinion but isnt Hackney just a better version of Winks? 

 

We need a midfielder who can cover ground and win the ball back, not another lightweight player that specialises in passing.

Hackney definitely isn't just a passer like Winks

 

image.png.b81b867d216c49995ee471cb22d7bbb4.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
JimJams

JimJams

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

Unpopular opinion but isnt Hackney just a better version of Winks? 

 

We need a midfielder who can cover ground and win the ball back, not another lightweight player that specialises in passing.

 

In the same way that Samuel Eto'o was just a better version of Daka you mean?

 

TrollFaceDancing_reasonably_small.gif

Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

Unpopular opinion but isnt Hackney just a better version of Winks? 

 

We need a midfielder who can cover ground and win the ball back, not another lightweight player that specialises in passing.

He's pretty robust as a defensive minded midfielder as well as being able to get on the ball and create.

 

I'd prefer Zeneli for about 1/4 the price mind you.

  • Like 3
DezFox

DezFox

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, HankMarvin said:

A good signing, he has good numbers for the last few seasons

We should be going all in for him. We won’t, so frustrating. We won’t be even looking until we have sort bilal and it will be too late. I hate king power with all my heart. 

  • Like 1
honeybradger

honeybradger

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Hackney definitely isn't just a passer like Winks

 

image.png.b81b867d216c49995ee471cb22d7bbb4.png

Wow, really puts it into perspective how limited of a footballer Winks is. 

 

Hackney would be a very good player for us (and likely wouldnt come here) but with our limited funds I would still like us to go for a player that is a bit more focused on the defensive side of the game like that Zeneli guy Ric mentioned.

  • Like 1
moore_94

moore_94

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

Wow, really puts it into perspective how limited of a footballer Winks is. 

 

Hackney would be a very good player for us (and likely wouldnt come here) but with our limited funds I would still like us to go for a player that is a bit more focused on the defensive side of the game like that Zeneli guy Ric mentioned.

Sell Winks off as well and somehow get both :thumbup:lol

  • Like 1
kingfox

kingfox

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, JimJams said:

 

Cracking signing if they pull it off. 
 

Would be a good replacement for BEK if he leaves, Jack Rudoni and Isaac Price the same. 
 

Shame we have very little chance of getting one of them. 

Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, kingfox said:

Cracking signing if they pull it off. 
 

Would be a good replacement for BEK if he leaves, Jack Rudoni and Isaac Price the same. 
 

Shame we have very little chance of getting one of them. 

I’d be weary of Isaac price. He hasn’t had any output before this season. Doesn’t necessarily mean he can’t do it but who knows if he’s just on a purple patch. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...