loftus-cheek

[filbertway]

Is there anyway to block a thread?

[Big Dave]

I don't think he's a bad player at all - he just needs a run of games in a half decent side.

I think he would do OK for us, however I don't really see where he fits in.  We currently have plenty of midfielders in the squad.

[Pliskin]

Absolute balls, lads just a tall junior Lewis. 

[Jattdogg]

Mange la merd.

[Lambert09]

17 minutes ago, filbertway said:

Is there anyway to block a thread?

don’t click on the name of the thread you don’t want to see.. thats how i dealt with elyonoussi  

[Realist Guy In The Room]

Fvcking crap

[filbertway]

4 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:

don’t click on the name of the thread you don’t want to see.. thats how i dealt with elyonoussi  

I can't help it, I just middle click on my mouse the top 5 unread threads without reading the titles.  I ended up in the WAGs argument thread earlier, nearly lost half my brain cells.

[Saxondale]

Rather have a loft conversion.

[sdb]

Good player but injury prone, expensive and not sure his heart would be in it. 

[CrispinLA in Texas]

Chelsea trying to give us their deadwood in part exchange.....we got enough of them without adding more

[Tielemans63]

Ugh. No thanks. Bang average player and plays in a position that is not urgent for us.

[Finnegan]

Looking forward to tomorrow when we're linked to /checksnotes, Generic Chelsea Discardee #56435

[foxinsocks]

Just... no.

[CrispinLA in Texas]

Just because he plays for Chelsea and has a daft name  people think he's good, if he played for Fulham nobody would even notice him 

[majaco]

5 minutes ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

Just because he plays for Chelsea and has a daft name  people think he's good, if he played for Fulham nobody would even notice him 

He did play for Fulham. And you're right.   I, for one, didn't notice.   

[lee7]

I think Chelsea are trying to get their own back for us selling them Drinkwater for 30M+ 

 

Not a chance we will bring Loftus-cheek here. He is nowhere near consistent enough.

[AmarteyAndChill]

Probably already on more than our highest earner

[tetly]

For the right price he would be worth a punt. He is still young and has showed in patches he can be a very good player. 

[SafewayFox]

It’s a big HELL NO from me.

 

The one position that we don’t need any more squad fillers is at CM.

 

He’s basically a busted flush, could have been quality but never cemented a place in Chelsea’s starting 11 with some forgettable loans at Fulham/Palace.

 

Fair play to him though, he’s a good looking fella as a consolation 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Sly]

33 minutes ago, tetly said:

For the right price he would be worth a punt. He is still young and has showed in patches he can be a very good player. 

That price is £10m and on a 1/3 of the wages he’s on now. That’s why he’s still at Chelsea and hasn’t moved on. 

[Weller Wing]

Hate Chelsea (although I pretty much hate everyone 😆)

 

Don't sell to them

Don't buy from them

F%@£ them

[Guest Col city fan]

To lose Tielemans to sign Loftus-Cheek..

If this were to happen, the clubs going down the shit-pan

[Guest Col city fan]

1 hour ago, Saxondale said:

Rather have a loft conversion.

🤷‍♂️

[volpeazzurro]

Keep what we've got. Unless Rodgers does remarkably well, he's had his chance, get rid at the start of the World Cup and back the new man. Just absolutely don't give Rodgers any say whatsoever in the future. 

[CrispinLA in Texas]

56 minutes ago, Col city fan said:

To lose Tielemans to sign Loftus-Cheek..

If this were to happen, the clubs going down the shit-pan

You mean Fofana not Tielemans 👍🏼