Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
davieG

Premier League time-wasting: Referees failing to clamp down on stoppages with IFAB set to discuss solutions

Recommended Posts

It's a predictable farce now watching the winning team going through their repotoire of delaying tactics aided by the officials. 

 

The rule makers have given them another tool to use and we see the likes of Fulham (and others) exploiting to the maximum the new head injury stoppage. 

 

This winds me up as much as anything else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, lcfcsnow said:

It was sorted in the World Cup, once players realised the time was being added on the sitting down and cramp coincidentally ended.

Then seemed to get less and less by the end though as if they had been told it was too much.

 

But yes clearly we cannot have games where the ball is hardly in play or players are allowed to do what they like .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Super_horns said:

Then seemed to get less and less by the end though as if they had been told it was too much.

 

But yes clearly we cannot have games where the ball is hardly in play or players are allowed to do what they like .

Or, the players didn't waste as much time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say have a timer like the NBA's shot clock - you have X amount of time to get the ball back in play

If not, issue the yellow to the goalies only and not the player actually committing the infraction.  I guarantee there will be no time wasting then.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sunbury Fox said:

I notice that Marco Silva isn't one of the managers complaining about time wasting. 

Some of those who are named in that article are some of the worst offenders and ones that are being looked at by official bodies. There's going to be some grumpy managers over the next few months.

 

Fulham are being looked at with incidents in our game noted but not yet serial offenders.

Edited by LcFc_Smiv
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

They should have post-match video review citing panel, like in rugby.

 

If a player is struck somewhere that isn't the head (or just has his ear flicked, etc) and goes down clutching his head to try and gain a stoppage (the old Rivaldo)...

 

Or if he does the whole screaming, head in the turf, broken a limb in agony, slapping the floor, signalling to the bench, and then about 2 minutes later, jumps up, limps for 2 seconds and is then running around normally....

 

Or if he dives without contact, etc...

 

It is cheating, and the reviewing authorities should then announce that the player cheated and they should ban the cheat for up to 5 games.

 

A few cheats shamed and banned, and it would soon stop being an issue.

 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Easy way to fix the problem we saw against Fulham is any player going down with a head injury, needs to go off for a concussion test. 
These tests usually take 10–15 minutes and would benefit the overall health of a player in the case of serious head knocks, ensuring the best treatment is given. The flip side is no player will fake a head injury knowing they will be out of the game for 10-15 minutes. 
We could have concussion subs used to cover the player so no team is disadvantage when a player receives a head injury.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read today that this seasons game between Crystal Palace v Leeds the ball was in play for only 44 minutes, 44 that is crazy when the average is 55mins which is bloody bad enough.

 

Games involving Leeds, Newcastle, Brentford & Villa have the lowest ball in play times, on the other end of the scale Man C record the highest ball in play, guess who’s next, yep Leicester followed by Spurs n Liverpool.

 

There have been something like 44 yellows shown for time wasting, 8 for Villa followed by Newcastle.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's fundamentally wrong that some matches are longer than others. Some teams have less time than others to score goals.

 

I have no problem with teams killing time legitimately when the ball is in play, keeping it in the corner etc.

 

The timewasting while the ball is not in play has to stop. The use of a ball in play clock would solve the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said it before and I'll say it again; what the game needs is an independent official timekeeper. Take this onerous response out of the hands of the match officials.

 

The timekeeper will have the power to "stop the clock", so to speak, and it will be he/she who determines when the half and full time has finished which can be displayed on the big screens.

 

It works in other sports and would be quite simple to implement but as is the case in football it has to be made difficult. Meanwhile the paying public are being shortchanged. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/01/2023 at 16:40, StriderHiryu said:

But conversely if say you go to 10 matches, you probably get the equivalent of one match for free from all the stoppage time. Watch 11 for the price of 10! lol

 

Also people leave early already, that's on them. I get it that sometimes you have to go early to get your train, i've done it once at the Copenhagen Champions League match leaving at bang on 90 minutes running like a madman to get a train, and it sucked. But that's on me really. 

lets have 7.30 kick offs or even 7.15 then , 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/01/2023 at 21:06, yorkie1999 said:

it used to be 10 yards from a free kick, if the oppo player is trying to prevent the quick free kick, yo could boot the ball against him and he'd get booked for not getting out the way. why aren't players doing this any more? 

Maybe because some refs aren't booking offenders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.  If a team is wasting time over putting the ball in play, then reverse the decision.  a free kick one way becomes a free kick the other way, a goal kick becomes a corner and vice versa, a throw in goes to the other team.  Let that decision be made promptly and without warning, and players who dissent can expect a booking.  (Of course, that would mean the FA had to stand up for the referees, and that's not going to happen.)

 

2.  Substitutions - if the player being subbed is not off the field in 15 seconds, then he still has to go off but the sub can't come on until the next break in play.  Players, like now, can leave in any direction.  They could put a timer with buzzer in the 4th official's electric display board.

 

3.  Extend the keeper's 6 second rule to 12, and enforce it.

Edited by dsr-burnley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, dsr-burnley said:

1.  If a team is wasting time over putting the ball in play, then reverse the decision.  a free kick one way becomes a free kick the other way, a goal kick becomes a corner and vice versa, a throw in goes to the other team.  Let that decision be made promptly and without warning, and players who dissent can expect a booking.  (Of course, that would mean the FA had to stand up for the referees, and that's not going to happen.)

 

2.  Substitutions - if the player being subbed is not off the field in 15 seconds, then he still has to go off but the sub can't come on until the next break in play.  Players, like now, can leave in any direction.  They could put a timer with buzzer in the 4th official's electric display board.

 

3.  Extend the keeper's 6 second rule to 12, and enforce it.

Those type of changes can't be made by the FA. Most of the problems would disappear if refs used the power they already have.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, davieG said:

Those type of changes can't be made by the FA. Most of the problems would disappear if refs used the power they already have.

Refs are too concerned about managing the occasion rather than refereeing correctly, especially at the top level. For some reason they see themselves as a conductor rather than someone who's there to make sure the rules of the game are adhered to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...