Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Started off well, putting in some good defensive tackles and played a wonderful 40yd cross field ball to Abdul. If he'd controlled that, he'd have been clean through. But as the game went on he looked visibly tired, like he's not match fit. Overall VK or Thomas, both are shit and shouldn't be starters.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jammie82uk said:

He was clearly injured and had been for several minutes beforehand, subs was slow to come on to replace him and then it was too late 

Agree. He was injured. But he sprinted initially. Then gave up. Then sprinted again when the penny dropped as to how dangerous the situation was. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, TrentFox said:

Agree. He was injured. But he sprinted initially. Then gave up. Then sprinted again when the penny dropped as to how dangerous the situation was. 

Did he give up or was it the injury hindering him? I guess only he will know the answer to that

Posted
13 minutes ago, sm1 said:

Overall VK or Thomas, both are shit and shouldn't be starters.

I tend to agree but whoever plays left back is going to struggle with Vestergaard playing LCB,  you can’t encourage your left back to go forward if your LCB is not going to cover them

Posted
1 hour ago, Paninistickers said:

Thomas isn't not much better. He's considerably worse .

 

VK was pretty ok. A steady 6/10. Took a knock first half  And was clearly signalling to come off shortly before second goal. 

 

Thomas isn't professional level. 

 

Sorry, I disagree. They’re both much of a muchness. 

Posted

I get the complaints about Thomas, but Kristiansen is the player I most want to see banned from the training ground and told to just leave. He doesn’t want to be here, he doesn’t want to play for us, and he’s nowhere near good enough for the club to put any effort into him.

Posted
2 hours ago, Paninistickers said:

Thomas isn't not much better. He's considerably worse .

 

VK was pretty ok. A steady 6/10. Took a knock first half  And was clearly signalling to come off shortly before second goal. 

 

Thomas isn't professional level. 

 

6/10!!!

 

Bloody hell

Posted
1 hour ago, Sly said:

Sorry, I disagree. They’re both much of a muchness. 

But at least VK overlaps the winger to try to do something, at the start at least. Mavadidi never passes to him because he’s greedy and thick.  VK seemed to stop bothering making runs and played the same boring pass backwards like Thomas.

 

How we have gone from Fuchs, Chilwell to these idiots. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Paninistickers said:

Thomas isn't not much better. He's considerably worse .

 

VK was pretty ok. A steady 6/10. Took a knock first half  And was clearly signalling to come off shortly before second goal. 

 

Thomas isn't professional level. 

 

Neither should be playing. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Paninistickers said:

Thomas isn't not much better. He's considerably worse .

 

VK was pretty ok. A steady 6/10. Took a knock first half  And was clearly signalling to come off shortly before second goal. 

 

Thomas isn't professional level. 

 

What is he- a Leicester cuck? Stop with your nonsense.
 

Thomas(actually played okay in some games)is crap and so is VK but at least one of them loves the club.

  • Like 1
Posted

Was he even injured? Just looked knackered like he always does.  Another one who should never been seen in the squad ever again. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Neither should be playing. 

Exactly this. But manager won’t change formation, that seems out of the question with him, so we’re stuck with one of them playing. Joke.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...