Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Mike1983

Victor Kristiansen

By Mike1983, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Sly

Sly

Posted
Posted

At the rate we are going, our defence is going to be Thomas. Faes, Vestergaard, Ricardo

 

…… we’ve seen how this plays out. 

Claudio Fannieri

Claudio Fannieri

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Clever Fox said:

I hate to see any player injured but that means he's likely to be here next season.

 

As it will likely be April again he gets back playing.

Exactly my thoughts, I was hoping he would be one to leave in January to help create funds to bring in new players. 

  • Like 1
Gazza M

Gazza M

Posted
Posted

No loss. Is always a liability when ever he plays, fit or not. Would look to get off the books next summer now. Sure a return to Denmark would appeal to him having been in our circus nearly 3 years. 

  • Popular Post
DennisNedry

DennisNedry

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Weird comments in here.

 

Yes he's a limited footballer but I've seen nothing to suggest he's a bad lad or has the arrogance of the likes of Faes etc. He doesn't deserve getting pelters imo.

 

  • Like 7
AKCJ

AKCJ

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, DennisNedry said:

Weird comments in here.

 

Yes he's a limited footballer but I've seen nothing to suggest he's a bad lad or has the arrogance of the likes of Faes etc. He doesn't deserve getting pelters imo.

 

He's about as brave as a church mouse. Simply not up to it.

 

The blokes a complete wimp.

tinpot_fox

tinpot_fox

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

Give Rodgers money! He hasn’t been backed!

 

And here we are 

Guilty as charged myself

 

11 hours ago, coolhandfox said:

Remember when people got excited because he was good at fist pumps........

again, guilty as charged myself

Guest worth_the_wait

Guest worth_the_wait

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Sly said:

At the rate we are going, our defence is going to be Thomas. Faes, Vestergaard, Ricardo

 

…… we’ve seen how this plays out. 

Isn't Ricardo due an injury soon?       (sorry, shouldn't joke about things like that)

Fox92

Fox92

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, tinpot_fox said:

Guilty as charged myself

 

again, guilty as charged myself

 

40 minutes ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

Fair play

 

You’re exonerated 

 

Now where’s Chocolate Teapot?

Tbf, again, nothing wrong with the manager (in this instance, Rodgers) saying he wants players/backing but then it comes back to the guy with the job title "Director of Football".

 

Can't pick and choose what to blame Rudkin/the Board for.

  • Like 1
The Year Of The Fox

The Year Of The Fox

Posted
Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, Fox92 said:

 

Tbf, again, nothing wrong with the manager (in this instance, Rodgers) saying he wants players/backing but then it comes back to the guy with the job title "Director of Football".

 

Can't pick and choose what to blame Rudkin/the Board for.

Plenty wrong imo

 

 

He could no longer get a tune from Tielemans, Barnes, Maddison, Soyuncu who all left for bigger and better clubs than us.

 

Clearly also Rodgers was given more reign (than we normally give a manager) in terms of signing who he wanted- how else did we end up with Benkovic, Bertrand and Bennett? That view is backed up by us signing Rodgers’ mate (forgot his name now) who had an awful reputation and went on to briefly manage Atlanta


The fault of the board was giving him that reign, and agreeing to the signings and putting them on ridiculously long contracts. Not the actual choosing of players.

Edited by The Year Of The Fox
  • Like 1
foxinsocks

foxinsocks

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

Plenty wrong imo

 

 

He could no longer get a tune from Tielemans, Barnes, Maddison, Soyuncu who all left for bigger and better clubs than us.

 

Clearly also Rodgers was given more reign (than we normally give a manager) in terms of signing who he wanted- how else did we end up with Benkovic, Bertrand and Bennett? That view is backed up by us signing Rodgers’ mate (forgot his name now) who had an awful reputation and went on to briefly manage Atlanta


The fault of the board was giving him that reign, and agreeing to the signings and putting them on ridiculously long contracts. Not the actual choosing of players.

the board bet the farm on rodgers

  • Like 1
Miquel The Work Geordie

Miquel The Work Geordie

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

Clearly also Rodgers was given more reign (than we normally give a manager) in terms of signing who he wanted- how else did we end up with Benkovic?

 

There's plenty to blame Rodgers for, but I don't think we can chastise him for signing someone who arrived at the club 6 months before he did 

Fox92

Fox92

Posted
Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

Plenty wrong imo

 

 

He could no longer get a tune from Tielemans, Barnes, Maddison, Soyuncu who all left for bigger and better clubs than us.

 

Clearly also Rodgers was given more reign (than we normally give a manager) in terms of signing who he wanted- how else did we end up with Benkovic, Bertrand and Bennett? That view is backed up by us signing Rodgers’ mate (forgot his name now) who had an awful reputation and went on to briefly manage Atlanta


The fault of the board was giving him that reign, and agreeing to the signings and putting them on ridiculously long contracts. Not the actual choosing of players.

I'm not disagreeing it was time for him to go, and with the squad we had we should have been performing better, but you're criticising Rudkin/Board for signings under some managers but not others (mainly because you continue your dislike for Rodgers). I have not a clue if Rodgers was given more reign than other managers, that is something that seems to crop up a lot without actual evidence, but overall our signings ended up not good enough and I attribute that to Rudkin/Board because it's been happening over a long period now and under different managers. The actual choosing of players, transfer fees and long contracts have been appalling. Even under Maresca, a successful manager here, we wasted money on Cannon and Coady.

 

Don't know who a thread about a left back, again a poor signing, has turned into this but it's all on Rudkin/Board and nobody else. 

Edited by Fox92
The Year Of The Fox

The Year Of The Fox

Posted
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Miquel The Work Geordie said:

 

There's plenty to blame Rodgers for, but I don't think we can chastise him for signing someone who arrived at the club 6 months before he did 

IIRC Rodgers took him to Celtic from us, then brought him back to here after Rodgers joined us, but didn’t play him? 

Edited by The Year Of The Fox
The Year Of The Fox

The Year Of The Fox

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Fox92 said:

I'm not disagreeing it was time for him to go, and with the squad we had we should have been performing better, but we criticise Rudkin/Board for signings under some managers but not others. I have not a clue if Rodgers was given more reign than other managers, that is something that seems to crop up a lot without actual evidence, but overall our signings ended up not good enough and I attribute that to Rudkin/Board because it's been happening over a long period now and under different managers. The actual choosing of players, transfer fees and long contracts have been appalling. Even under Maresca, a successful manager here, we wasted money on Cannon and Coady.

Well you only have to read about Rodgers’ “transfer committee” he was interviewed about whilst managing Liverpool to imagine something similar happened here when we offered him that massive new contract. Especially when you add Lee Congleton joining/following Rodgers. You only have to join the dots 

Miquel The Work Geordie

Miquel The Work Geordie

Posted
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

IIRC Rodgers took him to Celtic from us, then brought him back to here after Rodgers joined us, but didn’t play him? 

 

He was signed under Puel in August 2018 – you can't really blame Rodgers for him being on our books. Plenty of other shite you can though!

Edited by Miquel The Work Geordie

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...