Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
sylofox

Spend Spend Spend

Spend big or not  

355 members have voted

  1. 1. So what do you want us to do?

    • Small amount and prey but sort out ffp
      206
    • Just spend and worry about sanctions later.
      149


Recommended Posts

So we know we are in the prem next season.

We also know we need to Spend.

 

With proposed new sanctions fines not pts deductions. If this is sorted before the window closes what do you want us to do?

 

Obviously we need relegation clauses in wages and not over inflated wages as before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bazly said:

Maybe you haven't heard but there is a ban on recruitment. Not from the board but the football league. Unless this is ignored or removed then its sell sell sell.

Source that anything anecdotal written is going to be enforced by the PL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Suzie the Fox said:

Ban is lifted if we are promoted, which we now are :D 

According to press pundits, the EPL has yet to rule on whether to lift or uphold the contracts embargo.

If the embargo holds then no new contracts can be entered into, including for those players like Vardy and Ndidi and Lurch whose contracts are ending. Then, to help lessen the financial breaches which will bring their own sanctions then money is needed from player sales.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bazly said:

According to press pundits, the EPL has yet to rule on whether to lift or uphold the contracts embargo.

If the embargo holds then no new contracts can be entered into, including for those players like Vardy and Ndidi and Lurch whose contracts are ending. Then, to help lessen the financial breaches which will bring their own sanctions then money is needed from player sales.

All players will have something in their contract about renewal 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, sylofox said:

So we know we are in the prem next season.

We also know we need to Spend.

 

With proposed new sanctions fines not pts deductions. If this is sorted before the window closes what do you want us to do?

 

Obviously we need relegation clauses in wages and not over inflated wages as before.

Well Rudders has always failed miserably before repeatedly hence the numbers for Daka, Vestergaard, Soumare, Bertrand etc. so good luck with that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Lionator said:

Those who are saying spend and worry later cannot possibly complain about Ruskin ever again? 
 

The reality is that we need to find a middle ground. Buy young players who can grow, a couple of stars and unfortunately be ruthless with those who are already at the club on mad wages (if we can even sell them). 

That takes the biscuit 

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Praet, Ndidi and Iheanacho will leave. It's likely Doyle and Yunus won't be here next season either.

 

I'd imagine a left sided centre back, inverted full back, #8, winger and forward will be brought in but no more than that.

 

Basically whoever leaves will have a like for like replacement 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Priority should be to keep Dufkin well away from recruitment and contract negotiations.  He has proven that he does not understand the Financial side of running a football Club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we buy King Power International for a pound and sell it for a billion on something like the corrupt 6? Sell some hotels or something? Buy everyone through Leuven and loan them? Has to be some corruption? Who can we pay off? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's great to be going back up, but the club has completely ballsed up its finances, and it needs to be sorted out. Spend, spend, spend, and the casual approach we have taken to financial management has jeopardised anything that might be achieved on the pitch for years to come. It meant we went down (so it didn't even work), it also meant we are looking at repeated points deductions for the next few years, and it makes anything you accomplish look suspect. 

 

So I guess I'm in the 'be more cautious' camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

End of the day if we fully comply with this bullshit FFP bollocks we are going down, look at the teams this year, not even close to staying up with deductions for Forest and Everton, so I'd just tell them get ****ed. Sheffield Utd sold their best to comply with FFP and they are relegated because of it. 

Edited by Foxin_Mad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...