Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Stuntman_Mike said:

That Solanke fee is genuinely unbelievable, even for these days.

He can be a great player on his day, but that just sounds desperate from Spurs.

 

Bet they're annoyed that Richarlison isn't going to Saudi for ££m, now..

Posted
4 minutes ago, Stuntman_Mike said:

That Solanke fee is genuinely unbelievable, even for these days.

Is it all just inflated bollocks and in a few weeks we'll see two spurs players rock up at Bournemouth for a combined £30-35m?

Posted
24 minutes ago, Stuntman_Mike said:

That Solanke fee is genuinely unbelievable, even for these days.

I’m shocked how Bournemouth are getting that for him, one good season. Not saying he won’t continue but wow it is a lot based on that. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

65 million for Solanke. Enjoy it when clubs take the greedy 6 to the cleaners.

Read that the 65m is only for certain clubs 🤷........ anyway he did score 19 goals in the Premier last season 

Posted

weakens one of potential rivals (well at least one that are in the same ball park as us!) but gives them a lot of money. 

 

Hard to replace 19 prem goals though. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Stuntman_Mike said:

That Solanke fee is genuinely unbelievable, even for these days.

As great as 19 goals are in the league he has only done it once in the Premier League. Exactly the same as Ivan Toney, for example.

 

£60m is staggering. I'd be wanting a striker who has scored 15+ goals consistently for that much. I'm guessing Liverpool have a sell on so will be happy.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Vacamion said:

 

How on EARTH are Chelsea FFP compliant?  :blink:

 

 

They have sold a few last season ?

 

Highest income in a single transfer window: Chelsea set to break Monaco's  record | Transfermarkt

  • Thanks 1
Posted

It's a whopping fee but it's also a huge blow for Bournemouth's status as a premier league club if they can't successfully replace him.  He's about 40% of their goals.

Posted
45 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Obscene fees all around. 

Agreed but I don't blame the selling clubs. They are right to fleece the top teams.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Corky said:

Agreed but I don't blame the selling clubs. They are right to fleece the top teams.

Of course. They set a valuation and if a team meets in then fair enough. I think what annoys me most is how teams can spend those obscene amounts. Chelsea are the biggest culprits. It's like they have an endless pit. 

Posted
35 minutes ago, DennisNedry said:

54m for Neto and 60m for Solanke 😂

Neto was always off this summer. €60m is about right given his injury issues unfortunately. 

Posted

Solanke is a strange one. 10 goals in 96 appearances before last season, then 19 goals in 38.

 

It's a good move for him though as he should be the main man up top for them. 

Posted
2 hours ago, MPH said:

Who’s idea was this then?

 

 

 

Are there people who still care about this type of thing? I don’t 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, MPH said:

Who’s idea was this then?

 

 

 

I'm not really as bothered about this but the majority of kit from Adidas for me has been so poor for it's price.

Posted
4 hours ago, MPH said:

Who’s idea was this then?

 

 

 

Seems the only real reason for 'specialised Training Kits' is to make them saleable to the fans whether this has an impact on this I don't know I presume the club and Adidas don't think so. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...