Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, MPH said:

We have previously been described as very hard to deal with when clubs want to buy a player with us. Apparently ,demanding huge fees for our players being the concern that was raised.

 

 

this would fit in line with us  seemingly finding it ‘difficult’ to move players on..

Which is a double edged sword. We were all for it when it meant selling players we didn't really want or need to sell and getting the likes of £80m for Harry Mcguire but it's also a nightmare when we can't shift the likes of Booby Soumare!

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, StonyFox said:

We need the money, he wants to leave, we've signed another keeper, and 8 goalkeeper deals have gone through in the prem already. You can't make clubs bid, but you can also still be proactive in trying to sell players, which we are useless at.


He’s not long come back to full training following his surgery has he - think that would have been a huge issue in trying to negotiate and sort of sale at an earlier point.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, MPH said:

We have previously been described as very hard to deal with when clubs want to buy a player with us. Apparently ,demanding huge fees for our players being the concern that was raised.

 

 

this would fit in line with us  seemingly finding it ‘difficult’ to move players on..

Funny how we don’t get called hard to deal with by Chelsea, spurs or Newcastle when they were pulling our pants down. 
 

Shouldn’t be making a deal for someone like mads easy imo!  Be easy for faes sure… but not your valuable assets 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:

Funny how we don’t get called hard to deal with by Chelsea, spurs or Newcastle when they were pulling our pants down. 
 

Shouldn’t be making a deal for someone like mads easy imo!  Be easy for faes sure… but not your valuable assets 


The problem we have is we’ve rather visibly replaced him already - to the point it would be down right awkward if we didn’t sell him.

 

I don’t think we dare risk not selling him now.

Posted (edited)

£25-30m and sadly we have to cash in, he started the season as one of the best keepers in Europe, his form absolutely collapsed when he came back from injury (In his defence he was playing at such a level the fall was always going to look dramatic), still played a huge role and was one of the few players that can walk away with his head held high. 

Best of luck to him, he played a huge role in us going up, and now he's repaying our faith potentially in a deal that might help to get us out of a PSR hole. Absolutely massive potential on this lad, he could have been the new Kasper if we had stayed up. 

Edited by cityfanlee23
  • Like 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, LestaLad said:

 

Would be better if we could get these things done earlier in the window and not a week before the season starts . 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Md9 said:

Would be better if we could get these things done earlier in the window and not a week before the season starts . 

Why would they risk an injured player? I wouldn't want us to sign anyone injured or take that risk 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Ashley said:

Why would they risk an injured player? I wouldn't want us to sign anyone injured or take that risk 

Yeah I know just rubbish it’s had to be so late into pre season and doesn’t give us much room to do anything easily . 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Md9 said:

Would be better if we could get these things done earlier in the window and not a week before the season starts . 

He’s been training on the grass, feel he may not have played any friendlies is everyone knows he’s off and that’s why he isn’t being risked in games? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Md9 said:

Yeah I know just rubbish it’s had to be so late into pre season and doesn’t give us much room to do anything easily . 

Jakub is a ready made replacement should he go. Weve got AB, we'd probably promote Bausor if he hasnt been already with being away with the first team. 

 

Its not that mad a situation mate. I dont want to lose Mads but probably helps us out financially.

  • Like 1
Posted

Would be good business if we can get £25m+.

 

Hopefully this will kickstart some activity. Get this done, Coady gone and we can then hunt the striker we desperately need 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

What is good though is that we have a ready made replacement in training and has proven he's good enough and we don't have to spend any money. 

 

How many teams can do that in the keeper department?

Edited by fox_favourite
  • Like 1
Posted

I can live with hermansen and coady going but not BEK it's not even worth him going financially.

Gutted hermansen is going. This club really do like to take 1 step forward 2 back

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Ashley said:

Jakub is a ready made replacement should he go. Weve got AB, we'd probably promote Bausor if he hasnt been already with being away with the first team. 

 

Its not that mad a situation mate. I dont want to lose Mads but probably helps us out financially.

Yeah I am confident in Jakub as well. Knew mads would be off and keepers is actually not a bad position for us it’s more the fact would have money to spend a bit earlier and not rush deals any deals through , not that we would 😂 

Didn’t mean it to come across as why would we as I knew it would happen 🙂

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, MPH said:

Agreed.. I can still be disappointed to be losing a top top class keeper. Stol is a top class keeper. 
 

?

 

Hermansen is the easiest for me to accept because we have a very good replacement lined up ‘for free’

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...