Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
HarryDee8

Silko Thomas

By HarryDee8, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Fox 66

Fox 66

Posted
Posted

I always thought what are the manager and coaches seeing in this guy when they use to bring him on to try and change the game. Not enough pace and couldn't take on a player like Monga could. Opens up a squad place for a youngster with promise

Sly

Sly

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

Cowdenbeath

 

Dog and Duck pub in Glasgow more like. 

Claudio Fannieri

Claudio Fannieri

Posted
Posted

Never really saw why Cifuentes included him, didn’t really seem to offer much and there were far better prospects that could/should have been bloodied instead of him. 
 

Glad he is moving on as I am not sure what he he would offer to justify keeping him in and around the 1st team squad. 
 

As much as we need to get rid of the rotten apples and big earners, I also believe we need to trim down the number of players in and around the U21/23 academy age groups where there seem so many who have been here for so long and have yet to show they are remotely capable of stepping up. 
 

there are far too many examples of players like Thomas, Wanya and Golding who have shown very little in the last 2/3 years but are still here costing the club and yet rather than move them on for fees, we hoard them and just release them. Very strange. 

  • Like 3
Richmondfox

Richmondfox

Posted
Posted

One less waste of money off the books. He got paid decent money for what was a workout at the gym. 

 

Hamza, Skipp and Faes next please.  Hamza isn’t even good enough to have tenuous links to the Saudi league. 
 


 

 

Chrysalis

Chrysalis

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Rubbersoul said:

He was absolutely rubbish in League One for Wigan and was suddenly getting minutes for us last season. 
 

Found the whole thing so bizarre 

Whenever I seen him play was only one putting a shift in for us.

  • Like 1
AKCJ

AKCJ

Posted
Posted

Genuinely crap. Maddening that he got minutes ahead of more talented youth players simply because he was willing to run around a bit.

 

Says a lot about the state of the club that he was played 19 times for us last season.

  • Like 2
Foxin_Mad

Foxin_Mad

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

Never really saw why Cifuentes included him, didn’t really seem to offer much and there were far better prospects that could/should have been bloodied instead of him. 
 

Because Cifuentes was a blithering useless halfwit who knew less about football than the average person down the pub 

  • Like 1
winteriscoming

winteriscoming

Posted
Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, Ryy said:

He scores a hat trick vs us now lol

 

 

I don’t know who’s more stupid us offering him a new deal or another club in league 1 interested in signing him. 
Dreadful player. 

Edited by winteriscoming
  • Like 1
HankMarvin

HankMarvin

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, winteriscoming said:

I don’t who’s more stupid us offering him a new deal or another club in league 1 interested in signing him. 
Dreadful player. 

Depends on the level of the club, m sure newly promoted clubs in the league might see it as a good signing for them 

coolhandfox

coolhandfox

Posted
Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Presumably we are entitled to compensation?

I assume so, from the FA website: In the event of a player, who is under the age of 24 prior to 30th June 2026, not accepting an offer of re-engagement and subsequently signing on contract or non-contract terms for a new Club in England, the two Clubs must agree a compensation fee. 

 

Which was probably one of the reasons we offer him a contract. 

Edited by coolhandfox
  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...