Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, RoboFox said:

The club absolutely knew what the fans thought of the appointment. Rob Tanner has said they didn’t appoint him the first time around because of the reaction of the supporters.
 

We had anti-Martin chants in the stands a year before he got the job.

 

They hold the support in such contempt that I swear they do shit just to spite us.

I'd suggest also... clueless, inept, disgraceful, disinterested, self-serving, money grabbing, selfish, arrogant, greedy, or any other negative adjective you can think of.

 

So contemptuous. 

 

We've become a club that's mocked in the football circles and the press. It's abhorrent that we now stink the lower leagues out and it's entirely down to the bollox we have as owners, board members, etc. If they saw a missile coming their way they wouldn't duck, such is their arrogance and belief in their own infallibility.

Edited by Parafox
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, sm1 said:

Our owner took a team that won the FA cup and finished 5th, twice in the PL, and turned into a bottom half league 1 club within a few years. Martin is a problem, but our biggest problem is the owner and his side kick.

All true but a big part of Top’s problem is employing people like RM.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, oxford blue said:

Russell -

it appears to me that you instruct McCarthy to pass short when he has the ball with a long pass still being withing the penalty box. Have a look at Coventry's goal yesterday; Rushworth  kicked long for their winger to run onto the ball and score.What are your "learnings from this?

Surely Alves (who has "energy") could do something similar.(As an aside, I guess Burns could do similar a few years ago but he now seems to have little speed - doesn't a fitness test before diving a 3 year contract pick this up).   

Would this make it less likely for an opposition high press which has been used to good effect by teams knowing there is always a very short pass from McCarthy?

Suggested homework for the 3 week league break - watch our games from 2015/16 and consider why the title was won with City nearly always having less possession every game. Ok, we had some decent players but there was a different intent. Possession in itself does not win matches.

Try mixing the style up a bit and you may have a better reception from fans at end of most games.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          .

If I could grab this twat by the throat and shout this at him, it's exactly what I'd say. 

Posted
3 hours ago, ARM1968 said:

If Martin had an ounce of sense he would get into mix things up, not just stick to the same mind numbing rubbish.  Be a bit more direct at times, can’t hurt can it?  Currently we’re pants. 

It's his way, his way only. It's his doctrine. And it's always failed. He won't change and that's why he is so wrong for us.

 

I don't hate the man, how can anyone that doesn't know him. I just hate his tactical philosophy and the stubbornness that he believes in when it's clear to all that its a failed project.

 

Just sack him. He's not, and never was, the manager we need.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Foxmeister said:

All true but a big part of Top’s problem is employing people like RM.

And continuing to back his best man at his wedding. The knob will never sack his mate. Rudkin has a job for life until we're sold.

 

That's why the guy is bulletproof and he knows it.

 

Edited by Parafox
Posted

I admit to having a very serious bout of Martin Derangement Syndrome but he exemplifies a lot of what I dislike about modern culture and society. It's all about him and his half baked 'philosophy', and anyone that questions it or its results is getting "personal". No humility, no reflection, no backbone. At the same time he's so dull and lacking charisma. Soulless, thin-skinned football for the crappy 2020s. Compare that to some of the names mentioned in the just bumped Craig Shakespeare thread...

  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, bovril said:

I admit to having a very serious bout of Martin Derangement Syndrome but he exemplifies a lot of what I dislike about modern culture and society. It's all about him and his half baked 'philosophy', and anyone that questions it or its results is getting "personal". No humility, no reflection, no backbone. At the same time he's so dull and lacking charisma. Soulless, thin-skinned football for the crappy 2020s. Compare that to some of the names mentioned in the just bumped Craig Shakespeare thread...

100%

 

If you question the usefulness of his 'philosophy' then a finger pointing exercise begins as to who is to blame for it not working. He believes it to be infallible and, therefore, he is never at fault. He doesn't seem himself as working at Leicester and, with that in mind, under scrutiny of the Leicester fans. He sees himself as providing a valuable service that shouldn't be questioned whatsoever.

 

There's no more a untouchable and sacred position in society than a football manager with a 'philosophy'.

 

The funniest part is that they think they're SO intelligent and SUCH deep thinkers that they're not at all open to criticism and being critical. Critical thinking actually showing some intelligence, of course...

Posted
8 hours ago, Richmondfox said:

Pattern recognition shows that Martins ‘culture’ attracts a toxic reaction from fans and poor results on the pitch despite the resources and opposition. 

literally irrelevant to what's being discussed - the culture people are talking about is the egos behind the scenes, the sort of environment where it was seen as acceptable to hold up a sign saying Enzo I Miss U at a Christmas party when your current manager was under pressure, the sort of environment where players felt they could allegedly refuse to do strength and conditioning training under RvN, or turn up with their dogs like it was a trip down the park. If your pattern recognition is that that causes toxic reactions from fans, your pattern recognition is shit. The point is that that you don't need a manager who is tactically poor to fix that culture, you can do that and still win games of football.

Posted
1 hour ago, foxile5 said:

100%

 

If you question the usefulness of his 'philosophy' then a finger pointing exercise begins as to who is to blame for it not working. He believes it to be infallible and, therefore, he is never at fault. He doesn't seem himself as working at Leicester and, with that in mind, under scrutiny of the Leicester fans. He sees himself as providing a valuable service that shouldn't be questioned whatsoever.

 

There's no more a untouchable and sacred position in society than a football manager with a 'philosophy'.

 

The funniest part is that they think they're SO intelligent and SUCH deep thinkers that they're not at all open to criticism and being critical. Critical thinking actually showing some intelligence, of course...

Deluded useless twitter get him gone.

Simple theory,He will send us further backwards..

Posted
  • AI view of the Challinor option
  • The Play-Off Guarantee: In an unbelievable feat spanning 15 full seasons across AFC Fylde, Hartlepool United, and Stockport County, Challinor has never finished a season below a play-off place. [1, 2]
  • Proven EFL Architect: He successfully took Stockport from the National League all the way to a League One play-off final at Wembley in just a few short years. He knows exactly how to build a squad capable of handling the physical and grinding nature of the third tier. [1, 2, 3]
  • "Intensity is Our Identity": While Russell Martin’s teams can dominate possession but look toothless in attack, Challinor’s teams are famous for high-octane press, verticality, and scoring a massive volume of goals (averaging 1.9 goals per match at Stockport). [1, 2]
🛑 What's the Catch?
If there is any drawback to Challinor, it is his lack of pedigree at the very highest levels. He has never managed in the Championship or the Premier League. [1]
However, for a Leicester City side that needs to wake up from its current mid-table slump and immediately hunt down a 90-point League One target, Challinor offers the exact tactical grit and proven promotion blueprint they are missing.
 
  • Like 2
Posted

The fans didn't want him due to him being arrogant, unwilling to change from this obsession with passing out from the back when it causes constant pressures on the back line, his abysmal managerial record and the fact he's clearly out of his depth as a manager.

 

4 wins in the past 3 seasons, 12m in payoffs for being sacked due to the above yet our board still hire him.

 

I tried to give the benefit of the doubt and get behind him but Saturday was the last straw.

 

1-0 up, opposition down to 10 men for over an hour and we can't win.

 

No tactical shake up, no urgency to kill the game off and make a dent in the goal difference and as usual we self destruct.

 

He HAS to go now before it's too late 🫩 

  • Like 3
Posted

I’ve sort of come to the conclusion he will be here until we are sold, or go into admin and he can’t be paid. 

  • Like 1
Posted

You can just about believe that with this 3 week break and the chance to train these players to be better, we will still play exactly the same way in the next game. This is the infuriating thing.

  • Like 2
Posted
12 hours ago, Parafox said:

It's his way, his way only. It's his doctrine. And it's always failed. He won't change and that's why he is so wrong for us.

 

I don't hate the man, how can anyone that doesn't know him. I just hate his tactical philosophy and the stubbornness that he believes in when it's clear to all that its a failed project.

 

Just sack him. He's not, and never was, the manager we need.

It's so frustrating to watch, going short everytime is just as predictable as if we went long everytime. Good players should be able to make decisions in the moment based on the game situation, mix things up so we are less predictable to the opposition. I don't claim to be a football expert but it seems do obvious to me. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Pliskin said:

Some fans are still trying to defend him…….. the mind actually boggles………..

He’s been hated at every single club. All the fans say the exact same thing about his football but for some reason Leicester have to be the club to accept him 

  • Like 2
Posted

Manchester United manager Ruben Amorim defiantly stated that "not even the Pope" could persuade him to alter his 3-4-2-1 tactical formation.

 

A year later...

 

Ruben Amorim has stated he is open to adapting his tactics at AC Milan following a difficult start to life in Serie A and a 2-0 Europa League defeat to Benfica.

 

Russell Martin, are you listening? The best managers change and adapt.

Posted
On 20/09/2026 at 03:25, Stadt said:

It’s not unsalvageable - we just have to appoint a half decent manager rather than literally the worst footballing demagogue in the country.

 

Page, Alves, Riis, Braybrooke et al are better players than were coming up against. I’d be on board with your theory if Challinor was serving this up but instead we’ve got Chairman Mao when we need economic deregulation  

Here lies the problem, when did we last do that, aside from Maresca who was a tip off?

  • Like 1
Posted

Still smiling at the fact he had to walk past the away end to escape.  No hiding by going down a tunnel in the middle of the ground. 

 

At the next press conference he certainly cant say it was the opposition fans singing at him.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Chelmofox said:

Still smiling at the fact he had to walk past the away end to escape.  No hiding by going down a tunnel in the middle of the ground. 

 

At the next press conference he certainly cant say it was the opposition fans singing at him.

It would be so much easier if he was a dislikable person. Can't stand him as a coach/manager but it's nothing personal. The anger is toward the idiots that stuck two fingers up at us and appointed him. 

Posted
46 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

Here lies the problem, when did we last do that, aside from Maresca who was a tip off?

I think even 6/10 appointments probably get us up here. It’s just Martin is a 3/10 appointment for us with where we find ourselves.

 

Cooper was an abysmal appointment, RVN was crap but he inherited a very shit situation, Cifuentes was mediocre. Maybe I’ve fallen for it again but not-Russel-Martin or-extreme-possession-for-the-sake-of-it should actually go a long way. This team is capable of getting promoted, it’s certainly much more talented than the rest of the division.

 

There are still much bigger, background issues but the way we’re set up, especially defensively is fixable - we don’t have a curse or a hoodoo we just need to make some semi-sensible decisions.

 

Keeping Martin jeopardises the sale, KP’s finances, the future of the club so they do actually have to sort something out.

 

I hope:

A) Everything pans out absolutely fine, we click and Martin takes us up (not happening)

B) We realise our mistake quickly and sack him and appoint a sensible manager - ideally Challinor but anybody with a decent track record that works well with a young squad 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just trying to bring balance to this famously forgiving forum.

 

Huge change in playing staff, new coaches and relatively early days in the season.

 

Anyone believe ol' Toustle Martin has what it takes to get us promoted? Is he being judged too quickly by a 'told you so' mentality?

 

Got a feeling I'm going to get well and truly Ed Sheeran-ed here - but I'm currently on a sunny Greek island - so am literally in a good place to take the hate 🤪

 

Tin hat at the ready ... and GO! 🪖 

 

PS I intended this to be a separate post for positive only replies - but have been integrated into an existing one 😞

Edited by Gloria
Typo

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...