Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, KlaaZ said:

The involvement of an intermediary also isn't new, so it's really not more formal than it was before. 

Ok mate

Posted
16 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

All I would add is a Banks statue, same as at Stoke, holding the World Cup

The Banks & Shilton image would make a better statue. Really we ought to make a much bigger deal of the latter, genuinely one of the greats of the game, 1374 appearances! 2nd of all time, first until pretty recently (although Ronaldo will probably overtake him).

  • Like 3
Posted
11 hours ago, StriderHiryu said:

The case of Leicester City for me is an example of how effective Sports Washing can be. When they first took over, many fans were very hesitant and worried about who the new owners would be. Fast forward 15 or so years and you have people that defend them like they were one of their own family members. Notice how in the stadium "King Power" is emblazoned everywhere, but there is little about the history of the club like you would find in other stadiums around the country. None of the stands are named after former players or coaches, and though we have a statue, it's for the former owner. Now he actually deserved it, but still my point stands. 

 

If you force a brand down someone's throat for long enough, it will stick. 

 

I will always be thankful for the great memories King Power gave me as a fan, but to be honest throughout their entire tenure they never really sat well with me. It's always been too much of a forced narrative and keeping the fans at arms length. In the successful years like many you had to think "how can I complain, this is incredible", but in retrospect the niggles were always there, like the way Top hogged the trophy on the day we lifted the title. 

We've ended up as i expected we would. Just never expected what Vichai gave us.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Jon the Hat said:

He will probably appear as a director shortly.  Not normal for the CEO to be CoSec.

AI suggests this is usual practice - if the company sec changes role, they formally resign from it even if it's an internal promotion. 

Posted
50 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

I would move it to the memorial garden

 

Something for the 15/16 squad where the Vichai statue is currently

 

And Vardy outside the away end

As much as I agree with the sentiment, this would probably be a PR own goal among a large section of the fanbase. 

Posted

I just don't want some dodgy Dubai bloke. I've worked with some different football clubs at lower levels and I'd much rather something closer to the community that is sustainable than what the last 5 years produced. 

Posted
9 hours ago, -sodapop said:

Couldn't agree more. Not to sound too Richard Dawkins, but the Buddhist practices (being done around what is a multi-faith workplace in a multi-faith city) always struck me as off too. I wouldn't want any religion being given the spotlight in my football club, and it's weird that we've kind of taken it for granted that there are monks rocking up to the training ground and stadium once a season. I think it all falls under the problem with clubs being owned by the extremely wealthy - they just become extensions of their beliefs and interests at best, and active sport-washing tools at worst. I dream of living in a world where England had adopted 50+1. 

We did win the league though through some kind of magic.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

What a morning, sun is shining and the King Power reign of incompetency inches towards ending. Special shout out to those that said the protests were a waste of time.

As much as I'd like to think that the protests made a difference, given I was part of them, I'm not so sure that they did. I think King Power are reaching a scenario where their own financial situation is precarious to a point where they can no longer afford to keep us. 

Edited by BenTheFox
  • Like 4
Posted
34 minutes ago, Happy Fox said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_bin_Saeed_Al_Maktoum

 

New owner is this chap? is the CEO of Emirates.

 

Apparently his net worth exceeds a billion dollars.

 

But that doesn't appear to be very much compared to many Premier League owners:-

 

https://anyseats.net/blog/12-richest-owners-of-premier-league-clubs

 

Even Top has a family net worth of over 2 billion dollars.

Posted
1 hour ago, BenTheFox said:

As much as I'd like to think that the protests made a difference, given I was part of them, I'm not so sure that they did. I think King Power are reaching a scenario where their own financial situation is precarious to a point where they can no longer afford to keep us. 

They wouldn't have gone to Citi so readily if 500 people walked along raw dykes with a "king power please stay" banner.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Stadt said:

The Banks & Shilton image would make a better statue. Really we ought to make a much bigger deal of the latter, genuinely one of the greats of the game, 1374 appearances! 2nd of all time, first until pretty recently (although Ronaldo will probably overtake him).

Shilton is a very bitter old man 

Edited by Gamble92
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

They wouldn't have gone to Citi so readily if 500 people walked along raw dykes with a "king power please stay" banner.

Well if 250 people (max) walking down raw dykes with a 'King Power Out' banner was the tipping point then they're more thin skinned than I thought! 

Edited by BenTheFox
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Stadt said:

The Banks & Shilton image would make a better statue. Really we ought to make a much bigger deal of the latter, genuinely one of the greats of the game, 1374 appearances! 2nd of all time, first until pretty recently (although Ronaldo will probably overtake him).

Shilton refused to play for City in 1974 when the club refused his transfer request.

Posted
19 minutes ago, OnlyOneCity said:

Shilton refused to play for City in 1974 when the club refused his transfer request.

Expunge him from the records in that case, ban him for life 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...