Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

They'll go with Hamza for the social media engagement. Deadly serious.

I commented in another thread almost a month ago..the thought of this genuinely keeps me up at night. 
 

He has absolutely no place being captain of any football club let alone one of the most well known clubs in the land.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

I don't see who is guaranteed to start, even Chaplin.

 

If Souttar was staying it would be him, not sure about giving Nelson the armband yet and he might not be here either. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

Nelson if he stays.

 

Chaplin if not.

 

It simply cannot be Hamza.

Not Nelson for me. Doesn't strike me as a leader of men and simply hasn't done anything in his career to suggest he can lead by example. He may well get to that point but he's far too green just yet.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Wasyls Pec Deck said:

It’ll either be Hamza or Luke Thomas 😡 

Thomas, really??

Not a chance on earth that happening.

 

Be Hamza or Chaplain.

 

That said, if and its a big if he convinces Souttar to stay, he be given the armband.

 

Think his heads at Sheff utd, but i been told RM doing everything possible to keep him.

Posted
2 hours ago, Suzie the Fox said:

At the end of the day, does it really matter? I'm sure 'captain' in 2026 isnt the same as it was in the 00's or before. 

 

Only asking because i never see any difference from the player when they have the armband or not. Maybe i'm missing something? 

I agree, unless we have a Henderson type player that is constantly getting in peoples faces including his own players then what’s the point.

 

Ricardo was a useless captain. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Who are the leaders in the squad? ... That's the big question. We don't really have that big scary centre back or a vocal midfield presence. I though maybe we would sign a player to be captain

Posted
11 hours ago, AKCJ said:

Chaplin was in and around the captaincy at Ipswich.

 

I'd give it to him to be honest. Someone fresh to come in and set standards. I think giving it to someone that has been a part of what has happened here in the last 5 years is a mistake.

Standards & LCFC don’t go together 

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, EnderbyFox said:

I think it's pretty obviously going to be Hamza isn't it? Unfortunately 

Hamza should be nowhere near the captains armband, to be fair he should be nowhere near the team.....way overpaid for his ability and contributions over the last few years. 

not once when wearing the armband did i see him drag the team by the boot laces and lead...

Edited by Headcase
  • Like 1
Posted

Needs to be new player.

 

Someone who hasn't been in the recent toxic environment and not someone who has one foot out of the door like Nelson.

 

Has to be some one with a little class, who has there shit together of the field.

Posted

Has to be Hamza.  
 

Desperate for a redemption arc, he’s learned from his mistakes and for all his faults, can be inspirational on a pitch.  There is not a midfielder anywhere that tackles like him and the lift it provides when he does, is so good.

 

He is a local lad so for christ sake, make him a fvck!ng hero.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, DAS Boot said:

Has to be Hamza.  
 

Desperate for a redemption arc, he’s learned from his mistakes and for all his faults, can be inspirational on a pitch.  There is not a midfielder anywhere that tackles like him and the lift it provides when he does, is so good.

 

He is a local lad so for christ sake, make him a fvck!ng hero.

To be honest, I think the reverse of this is true; he strikes me as someone who has consistently failed to learn from his mistakes.

 

Should be nowhere near the captaincy IMHO - he's not consistent enough, he's rarely been trusted to be a regular starter under any of our recent managers and the evidence would suggest he lacks the professionalism required to be club captain and to set standards.

 

I think it sends out all of the wrong messages, to players and supporters, if Hamza is made skipper (IMHO). It's irrelevant that he's a local lad - he's hardly represented the club with pride at numerous points in his Leicester career.

 

Although he probably will finally be playing at about his level in League 1 - I will say that.

Edited by Tielemans63
  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...