Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, JimJams said:

How so, this was a free transfer?

It's in no way dodgy at all, he was simply a third choice keeper, although I don't know why we really needed one on a two year contract. Plenty of 30+ EFL keepers we could have brought in.

Posted
1 hour ago, davieG said:

No one knows if he would have been any worse or better than Stolarcyk/Begovic disasterclass

Russell obviously doesn’t fancy him, and I'm inclined to trust his judgement.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Ted Maul said:

Russell obviously doesn’t fancy him, and I'm inclined to trust his judgement.

Or he might have been the easiest / cheapest to move on, maybe no one is prepare to buy Stolacyk.

 

We'll never know the reasons behind some transfers I'd assume some are more complex / financial than others

  • Like 1
Posted

I never understood why so many were completely baffled by this transfer.  He was just a third choice goalkeeper because we need three.  He never played because he was third choice.  Quite simple really.

Posted
16 minutes ago, murphy said:

I never understood why so many were completely baffled by this transfer.  He was just a third choice goalkeeper because we need three.  He never played because he was third choice.  Quite simple really.


The only thing I find baffling is why we have 3 keepers. Two plus a youth teamer is absolutely fine as the third is so rarely used… and you can have an emergency loan if the first two are injured anyway

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, murphy said:

I never understood why so many were completely baffled by this transfer.  He was just a third choice goalkeeper because we need three.  He never played because he was third choice.  Quite simple really.

It was weird to sign a 3rd choice keeper from Spain to be fair lol

 

Posted

Surely something must have happened - personal issues, attitude etc, can’t understand why you’d go from a European final to 3rd choice, I doubt we’d have been paying him any more than Betis or whoever it was 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hales said:

Another wage off the books......👏

Same scenario as Vestergaard, yes he’s off the books but we’ve either paid his contract in full or he’s agreed a partial pay out. 
 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Danno said:

Surely something must have happened - personal issues, attitude etc, can’t understand why you’d go from a European final to 3rd choice, I doubt we’d have been paying him any more than Betis or whoever it was 

Can you remember Zieler, he played European football and didn’t make a save while he was here.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Katy said:

There’s something weird and dodgy about some of our signings and this is definitely up there. 

Need a keeper for cover, sign one on a free, let him go after he's no longer needed.

 

Dodgy as fook if you ask me.

Posted

Build the statue!

 

Didn’t he win our ironic “Player Of The Season” ?

 

In our situation, last season and this, I’d go with an Academy product as 3rd choice. It’s like any insurance policy, you resent the outlay but are glad you committed to it when the time comes to benefit from it. We were short in so many areas last season, the chance of two keepers being injured at the same time was way way down the list of problems. I would have gambled and saved the wage, with things so tight it wouldn’t tip the scales but would help. Similarly give Evans or Hutchinson every minute given to Carranza and Richards, it wouldn’t have affected results one bit.

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, RowlattsFox said:

It's weird it's taken this long, maybe we we were waiting to see if anyone came in for Jakub and noone has. 

 

Manager may have wanted to have a look at him and give him a chance.

Edited by coolhandfox

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...