Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, Paninistickers said:

Mine don't give two hoots about cricket. Mainly as they've never seen me sitting down watching it on the telly, as it's been anonymous and lost on sky for nearly 20 years. 

 

But I cannot for the life of me work out why, suddenly, bowling 100 balls instead of 120 will instantly fire up interest. Especially that the teams involved alienate 60% of the cricketing public

 

 

 

 

It might not. But in the same way dogs notice other dogs, my kids tend to notice other kids and all things aimed at them rather for an adult audience. The whole marketing around it is exceptionally bright and fun orientated and you have 'Skips' on shirts instead of Ínvestment mutual' or whatever. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, MaidstoneFox said:

It might not. But in the same way dogs notice other dogs, my kids tend to notice other kids and all things aimed at them rather for an adult audience. The whole marketing around it is exceptionally bright and fun orientated and you have 'Skips' on shirts instead of Ínvestment mutual' or whatever. 

Yup. I get that logic. Still can't see it working though (or at least every fibre in my being hopes it doesn't)

 

Kids, I hope,  aren't that easily patronised nowadays by hula hoops or cartoons. They go for bite sized funsters on YouTube nattering on about fifa or unboxing trainers or jake Paul or tiktok memes.  

 

Sport needs media / social media heroes, not 10CC blasting out and blue stumps. Vardy. Anthony Joshua. Tom Brady. Tom Daley even. Or more topical, Federer and Mark Cavendish. 

 

 

Posted

Is Gavin Griffiths Nixons love child? Rather than pay back maintenance he let's him play in the team? 

 

I can see no other rational explanation 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Cake said:

Is Gavin Griffiths Nixons love child? Rather than pay back maintenance he let's him play in the team? 

I can see no other rational explanation 

He's only going for 7.6 per over......... 

Posted (edited)

Yay, a wicket! Davis gets it. When I was watching earlier he was by far our best bowler. Convinced he should have had Conway out LBW at least once, if not twice in the first half an hour.

Edited by Sunbury Fox
  • Like 1
Posted

Another bizarre move in the increasing amount of bizarre moves around the county schedule- four weeks of T20, back to two games in the Championship then finishing off the T20 group.

Posted
2 hours ago, Cake said:

Is Gavin Griffiths Nixons love child? Rather than pay back maintenance he let's him play in the team? 

 

I can see no other rational explanation 

Klein, Evans and Wright are self isolating so to be fair there were few options 

Posted
19 minutes ago, harpendenfox said:

Klein, Evans and Wright are self isolating so to be fair there were few options 

Always a better option than Gavin Griffiths imo. Seconda or another batsmen. Play Steele he can bowl

Posted
12 minutes ago, harpendenfox said:

And now he's added a third. Gav's done a Kelechi

Ha ha ha guaranteed wasn't it. Fair play to him. I was wrong. 

 

Let's get into the rest of the team!

Posted

Our pace attack is struggling. Not convinced any of the lads playing today are up to the job if we're consistently going to be playing former D1 sides and if we are then we're ridiculously reliant on Wright who is getting on.

  • Like 1
Posted
18 hours ago, Cake said:

Ha ha ha guaranteed wasn't it. Fair play to him. I was wrong. 

 

Let's get into the rest of the team!

No I wasn't wrong

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, UpTheLeagueFox said:

166 runs (losing one wicket) in 31 overs in the morning session.

 

So essentially they'd be heading towards a pretty decent 50 over score... with their tail...

  • Like 1
Guest Lako42
Posted

I'd fancy a go at batting against our attack tbh. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...