Guest kristianity77 Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 Yes it does though. You have three starters, one on the bench, Liam has done fook all wrong this season, and he comes back from an unfortunate injury to find someone else in his place, would be bloody unfair. Some saying it won't be, but if people had a brain, and looked at the bigger picture, then you'll see how unfair it would be. You say Hobbs would be great cover for Moore, yet again Hobbs is better than sitting on the bench, he would be wasted on the bench, when he could be starting for someone like Forest week in week out. The last time we had many options in a position was in midfield under Sven, and people moaned. Right, so if we didnt buy Hobbs, but played Was say in for the 6 games or so and he had an absolute blinder in all 6, you think Moore should walk back into the team either way?
hackneyfox Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 We don't know that Miquel will go at the end of the season. If possiblke we should keep him as he's cover for LB. Strange that we're not making a move for Dawson, unless his salary demands are high, probably better than Hobbs & Moore and he scores more goals.
HesNotGudjonsonn2 Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 It seems like people think we will have too many central defenders and it will cause a rift and possibly effect the harmony. Let's look at it this way; Morgan - Starts Moore - Starts Was - twilight years Miquel - not ours St Ledger - never really happening Whitbread - on his way out. By my reckoning if we go up, which is likely, with Hobbs we will have three centre backs and probably need one or two more so I say get him.
LanguedocFox Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 I do find it bizarre, to say the least, that there have been nearly 2500 posts on that Florist forum on this subject: nearly a hundred a day on average, and still going. Ummm? Get a life? [Edited the numbers slightly downwards, but they're still a fvckin' weird lot.]
Deucalion Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 Just read some of the Forest posts and they think he has done really well this year. He must've improved over the last 3 years, no surprise really. Really hope this happens now.
WhispyWizard Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 He doesn't deserve to fight for his place, he deserves to start, as soon as he regains fitness. No-one "deserves" to just walk back into the first team after injury, and Moores mature enough to know that.
crazylegs1984 Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 How on earth are any of you debating the fact that Hobbs wouldn't add to the team , he has come on heaps and bounds since Sven GAVE him away , I would welcome him back even if he has to sit on the bench or play a part . He would be a valuable squad member and a very useful one at that , how about we just sit back and enjoy the ride to the premiership
Itsthejoeker Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 I still find it impossible to believe there is a 100 page thread on Jack Hobbs on the forrest forum
Tielemans63 Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 Just seen on SSN that Leicester have put in a bid for Jack Ho.....oh.
My Nads Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 I hope we get him. We need a defender that can win a header. Its our only real weak point.
LanguedocFox Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 Some people seem to forget just how good Hobbs was under Pearson: he was our Young Player/Player of the Year in his first two seasons, and if it hadn't been for Sven he would have grown with us over the past three years. Moore is excellent, but we need at least three, possibly four, really class defenders - and Hobbs would give us that depth. Sign him up asap, I say.
Tielemans63 Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 I'd love to see him back tbf. Was a great signing first time round and still only 25. Come home Hobbsy!
AKCJ Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 I do find it bizarre, to say the least, that there have been nearly 2500 posts on that Florist forum on this subject: nearly a hundred a day on average, and still going. Ummm? Get a life? [Edited the numbers slightly downwards, but they're still a fvckin' weird lot.] Nicky Maynard
Mark_w Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 Nicky Maynard And he hadn't even played for us, unlike Hobbs with Forest.
norfolk-fox Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 I thought I saw somewhere in here that Was was retiring at end of season? I think if this is true id be happy as provides cover not only centre back but allows Moore to fill in at RB if required and back from injury plus another solid CB for 3-5-2. Iv heard from a forest season ticket holder how well Hobbs has improved this season and worried without him forest will struggle! So id sign him up!
Corky Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 Was has done well at centre back, played majority of Saturday's game and we kept another clean sheet. We will see what tonight brings, but I will say not getting anyone in and keeping Was partnering Wes is probably a risk not worth taking. It might be a no brainer, but still when Liam is back, one of him and Hobbs will be on the bench, when both are starters. You'll have poor old Liam coming back from injury which couldn't be helped, and he sees a player in front of him, it really isn't fair on him. If it was someone else other than Jack Hobbs, I bet more fans would be pissed to see Liam lose his place. Is Hobbs any better than Liam Moore? No not really. So you'd rather we picked a worse player so when Moore is fit he feels he's got his place almost guaranteed? No thanks, better to have more options, Hobbs will know the situation. We had a lot of crying earlier this season when Moore was dropped/ rested yet he came back and kept his place in the team.
pazzerfox Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 What if Moore is injured for 6 weeks and misses 8 games? On Saturday Was could get injured, then what do we do? Getting Hobbs is a no brainer, forget staying 'loyal' to Moore, there is no loyalty in football anymore. We want promotion and if that means upsetting moore (he won't be upset, but that's what others are saying), then so be it. Can't believe some people are saying don't sign him because Moore won't be a starter, footballers relish the chance to get back into the team. This place is a joke. You mean...Was could get sent off!!!
Bluetintedspecs Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 Under Pearson he is a very solid defender. Your one man assault on the Forest forum had me in stitches Babs
mackiepas Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 Your one man assault on the Forest forum had me in stitches Babs Me too
cambridgefox Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 Your one man assault on the Forest forum had me in stitches Babs and me,but they don't care about us remember.
Guest Posted 28 January 2014 Posted 28 January 2014 Your one man assault on the Forest forum had me in stitches Babs Not content with trying to tell idiots how it is on FT, Babs is extending his crusade to the rest of the Midlands!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.