Drygon Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Personally speaking, I'd like to say it was absolutely deserved. It was dangerous play. It irrelevent if you get the ball, if the tackle endangers your opponent, which Vardys did, it has to be a red card. The ref doesn't really have much choice when someone jump in two footed with no part of your body on the ground. There's no intent though from Vardy, and the only reason he made the challenge was a poor pass.
matty98 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 When he tackled the player both feet were on the floor and studs were down, good tackle imo
dmayne7 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 5 minutes ago, Drygon said: Personally speaking, I'd like to say it was absolutely deserved. It was dangerous play. It irrelevent if you get the ball, if the tackle endangers your opponent, which Vardys did, it has to be a red card. You don't give the ref much choice when you jump in two footed with no part of your body on the ground. There's no intent though from Vardy, and the only reason he made the challenge was a poor pass. Apart from the fact it's not two footed and he's on the ground when he makes the challenge
LCFC hub Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Not for me! Sorry but he was being pulled back too by Johnson. His feet were both off the floor but not when he tackled for the ball. In relation to the Rojo tackles recently I think it's disgusting he's received red for that and Rojo didn't
funkyrobot Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 4 minutes ago, Drygon said: Personally speaking, I'd like to say it was absolutely deserved. It was dangerous play. It irrelevent if you get the ball, if the tackle endangers your opponent, which Vardys did, it has to be a red card. The ref doesn't really have much choice when someone jump in two footed with no part of your body on the ground. There's no intent though from Vardy, and the only reason he made the challenge was a poor pass. Totally wrong. Looks like we've got another keyboard Craig pawson on our hands guys!
desertfox2 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 He was off balance from being tackled, studs down got the ball and not malicious never a red card.
Aus Fox Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Never in a million years is it a red. If we start sending players off for what might have happened rather than what actually happened then the game is dead.
dynamark Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Good replays thanks. Knocked off his balance by Johnson and the lad he tackled was static which makes it look worse.Very harsh indeed.
Izzy Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 This thread will keep City fan Lee busy until Christmas
Benguin Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 It's a foul on Vardy. Should have been a free kick to Leicester with the ref telling Johnson not to be a **** and vardy to watch his legs even if he is riding a foul.
foxes_rule1978 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Just now, Izzy Muzzett said: This thread will keep City fan Lee busy until Christmas Christmas 2017?
Tom's Pasta Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Not dangerous, not malicious, just a genuine attempt to win the ball. Just because you leave the ground it doesn't make it a red card, if that was the case then you wouldn't be able to jump for headers ffs. A decision made by a ref who doesn't understand the game and made a panic decision because of what happened earlier in the week. Can refs stop making headlines and just use their common sense, if this is a red card then you might as well ban all slide tackles
Guest CityFan 06 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Not a malicious tackle and could argue either way for it being a yellow or red. Not conclusive enough for me so I think we've got a chance of that getting rescinded.
Tanya Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 I hope the club appeals the decision. Vards doesn't deserve to miss the next game.
inckley fox Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 You get those every game. Deeney did the same in the final minute of the Sunderland game today. Poor decision, dreadful refereeing performance, but perhaps there were a few over-reactions out there as well. I suspect there'll be some questions asked of our fans (though West Ham seem to keep getting away with that kind of thing, so why worry?) Brilliant performance. Great fight. Ulloa making a bit of a mockery of the Slimani price tag, Gray looking like he's earned his chance ahead of Albrighton, or one side of Ulloa/Vardy (with Mahrez the other side) in a 4-3-3. Amartey, King, Fuchs, Schmeichel all excellent.
Tielemans63 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Never in a million years. Can only hope Vardy's ban is overturned and Pawson cops a suspension for his utter incompetence.
lgfualol Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Harsh. Good way to get Vardy's name in the papers for book sales though.
Jonezy Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 17 minutes ago, Drygon said: Personally speaking, I'd like to say it was absolutely deserved. It was dangerous play. It irrelevent if you get the ball, if the tackle endangers your opponent, which Vardys did, it has to be a red card. The ref doesn't really have much choice when someone jump in two footed with no part of your body on the ground. There's no intent though from Vardy, and the only reason he made the challenge was a poor pass. So if you swing an elbow and do not hit anyone, you should get red carded as well because it endangers an opponent...???!!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.