dylanlegend Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 To be fair his record at WBA and Fulham wasn't too shabby but seriously this would be the biggest step back for our football club since we appointed Peter Taylor. Please Top.... anyone but Woy!!
Sharpe's Fox Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 5 minutes ago, Koke said: If Hodgson is a failure what was Ranieri before he came here? Sacked more times than I care to remember. I'm not saying Roy is ideal nor do I want him but that's harsh. At least Claudio had managed at the top level and was a spring chicken compared to the fool Hodgson. People are pointing to a mid table finish with West Brom half a decade ago as evidence he should come here. Pathetic. Go get Steve Clarke if that's what you want. If people think a failure with a bus pass would be a better fit for this club than Shakey they can take their face for a shit. Have some faith in the man who's been through it all with us.
Guest Col city fan Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 26 minutes ago, Strokes said: No! But better than Pulis. In what universe can Hodgson be better than Pulis as a contemporary football manager? What the fook are you on about?
onekeithweller Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 Should be: Yes No I don't really know what I'm doing here
TheSomersetFox Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 I'd be disgusted if Hodgson was appointed, but I'd get behind him.. for as long as I could
Strokes Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 4 minutes ago, Col city fan said: In what universe can Hodgson be better than Pulis as a contemporary football manager? What the fook are you on about? Pulis is anti football and a cùnt of the highest order. Whereas Hodgson is just anti football and a cùnt.
HighPeakFox Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 Just now, bridport007 said: I'd be embarrassed If you're serious, you're now disqualified from serious opinion...
Danizen Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 Did I imagine it or did we briefly flirt with Warnock after Sousa got the sack only for the fans reaction to be so overwhelmingly negative that the owners changed their minds? I'm not sure if this actually happened so if anyone else can remember this, please back me up. The point is, looking at the results of this poll, Hodgson looks even less popular than old Colin and that's saying something.
evostic Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 No. And why would we want to rock the boat again now?Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HighPeakFox Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 1 minute ago, Danizen said: Did I imagine it or did we briefly flirt with Warwick after Sousa got the sack only for the fans reaction to be so overwhelmingly negative that the owners changed their minds? I'm not sure if this actually happened so if anyone else can remember this, please back me up. The point is, looking at the results of this poll, Hodgson looks even less popular than old Colin and that's saying something. Annexing it?
Max Power Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 Prefer Shakey til the end of the season and pick from a much wider pool in the summer. But Hodgson isn't the absolute disaster that people are making out and would probably do a perfectly fine job for us.
Chester Dontlie Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 These Woy threads will give me nightmares I swear 16 minutes ago, Strokes said: No! But better than Pulis. To be frank I'd prefer Tony's baseball cap than Woy. IF we get Hodgson I'd be devastated. I can't believe we're even talking to him. I hope it's Thai equivalent of April Fool's, just a month early. Anyone but him. The horror! The horror...
Koke Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 9 minutes ago, Strokes said: Pulis is anti football and a cùnt of the highest order. Whereas Hodgson is just anti football and a cùnt. Why is Pulis a ****? He was wanking himself over us last season and his team got a point at Tottenham. Pulis has been nothing but complimentary about us.
murphy Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 Stale old owl-faced charisma free-zone who produces stale old teams. Triple tournament flop with England. No, just no.
ealingfox Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 Didn't realise he was as old as 70 - can't believe he even wants another job after England being that old. Maybe he feels he has a point to prove. Just can't warm to him after that infamous post-Iceland presser. Absolute cvnt.
Strokes Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 3 minutes ago, Koke said: Why is Pulis a ****? He was wanking himself over us last season and his team got a point at Tottenham. Pulis has been nothing but complimentary about us. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/football/2001/apr/27/newsstory.sport1 Lots of shitheads said nice things about Leicester last season. They are still shitheads.
Milo Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 46 minutes ago, Sharpe's Fox said: Could people stop saying they would just be "disappointed" or even "content". Pathetic. Take a view you cowards, this would be a disastrous appointment for any club who would claim to have confidence in its current staff and wants to portray themselves in any way as modern. I'd be less than content
Chester Dontlie Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 1 minute ago, Strokes said: Pulis is anti football and a cùnt of the highest order. Whereas Hodgson is just anti football and a cùnt. He may be but he was also one of the few (the only one I can remember) managers who genuinely praised our style of play last season while others were patronising or talking in cliches. What's more important he helped us in the crucial moment of the season, they didn't roll over for Spuds.
Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo Posted 2 March 2017 Posted 2 March 2017 Trying to be level headed... Err... He was a massive embarrassment to our national team, then again so was Ranieri with Greece and that turned out well. On the other hand he's a senile owl-faced cvnt-brained shit-stain bellend and I'd sooner give the job to Steve Kean
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.