goose2010 Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 7 minutes ago, Tuna said: If he's our player, technically we can loan him to a conference club surely can play for the under 23's?
AlloverthefloorYesNdidi Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 Exploring all options usually means you don't have any
Kitchandro Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 Sounds like we've cocked it up. If they're exploring all options it means they're desperate. 'All hail King Rudkin'
desertfox2 Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 If Fifa do or have rejected it and we appeal. Anyone know how long that process takes or has taken under similar circumstances? If this doesn't get resolved. It messes up us, the player and the Portuguese national side. Nobody wins. Well apart from Chelsea who were able to sign DD on the back of Silva being his replacement.
Great Boos Up Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 OK so we were a few minutes late after our 2 hour extension and have no decent midfield till Jan. On the plus side we have a nice meltdown to read and get to enjoy the great escape part three.
CyprusFox Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 3 minutes ago, Corky said: So we're in a situation where we've effectively lost a key player and can't replace him until January. Superb work. Our recruitment team's obviously up there with the WORST
SCP4Ever Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 2 minutes ago, CyprusFox said: Hope you're right. What's you're feeling about things from you're end? Look, if it was from any other source than a portuguese sports newspaper with a clear agenda against Sporting Clube de Portugal and president Bruno de Carvalho, I'd probably give it more credit. But considering where it comes from, with their own source being "someone close to the player", I have serious concerns. I would expect that, when someone close to the player knew something definitive, Leicester or Sporting would have already said something. therefore, the reports saying that things are still being discussed, debated, sorted, etc. is far more reliable than a claim from people with other agendas and motivations. So that you can put things into context, there was a debacle with West Ham regarding William Carvalho. Sullivan claimed that, among other things, the deal didn't happen because we accepted it too close to the deadline. Pretty much every WH fan thinks this is total BS, and yet, here, it's being reported that Bruno de Carvalho and Sporting are the bad guys, and poor Sullivan is the victim.
Steve Ayling Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 Could we not loan him until January and then sign him then, because if the deal is done on a buying thing then its just the registration thats the issue so register him on loan?
volpeazzurro Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 It's easy to judge from the outside without knowing the full circumstances like anything in life. For whatever reason for all we know, Leicester may have been told that he wasn't for sale until the last minute. We may even have been looking to sign somebody completely different that we don't even know about. Some of these things are complex issues made to look easy by armchair supporters who just think they know what they're talking about.
CyprusFox Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 2 minutes ago, Everygamefox said: Rudkin has to go! Utter shambles Somebody should!
yorkie1999 Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 1 minute ago, inckley fox said: He reports to the Chairman, obviously. The owners are ultimately responsible for our internal management. Rudkin's not a law unto himself. Yes, but the implication was who is ultimately to blame, and it's not going to be the owners is it. They're not going to sack themselves are they
WigstonWanderer Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 2 minutes ago, Tuna said: Brown paper envelope probably the best option.
Stadt Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 The language used doesn't seem terminal, it might be the club trying to save face but there's some hope it seems.
Babylon Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 2 minutes ago, Tuna said: "Can we register Silva?" "No" "Please" "No" "Pretty please"
Guest Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 4 minutes ago, Tuna said: Working on him going back on loan to sporting till jan
foxfanazer Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 Heads must roll (metaphorically speaking) Utterly embarrassing
Cincinnati Fox Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 I am ****ing raging! Rudkin you total toss pot
Babylon Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 Just now, Wookie said: The language used doesn't seem terminal, it might be the club trying to save face but there's some hope it seems. Apeal... anyone interested read the document on page 2 or 3 I posted. There is hope.
Guest Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 1 minute ago, Wookie said: The language used doesn't seem terminal, it might be the club trying to save face but there's some hope it seems. Why don't we release him then sign him on a free. That seems legit
Babylon Posted 5 September 2017 Posted 5 September 2017 1 minute ago, Soundman said: Working on him going back on loan to sporting till jan Impossible.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.